TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -73N-

a reply to: PokeyJoe

What makes you think its Arthur Davis.





I see clear differences myself.

originally posted by: Sabrechucker

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: crankyoldman

Cranky (and Sabre!),

I've just noted a significant tie between Q Posts #1822 and #1824 from qntmpkts.keybase.pub - regarding "knowingly"!

RELEVANT PARTS of posts:
#1822

Fake News collaborating and pushing knowingly false information?
Fake News ‘KNOWINGLY FALSE’ narrative pushes.

#1824

President's 'knowingly' [unequally] distribute

(Bold emphases mine)

In #1822 Fake News agents 'knowingly' push false narratives.
In #1824 BHOs operatives 'knowingly' distribute unequally wealth.

I think this links back to the diagrams of MSM reporters as the nucleus of deep state cells, giving FBI etc. their orders.

Is Q saying that MSM cell heads also direct where the wealth goes?

Why "knowingy"? Because in that cell structure, it is only the MSM reporters at the nucleus who know the whole story?

That would make a lot of sense, We all know who they work for. They're talking points directly affect in a lot of cases, which direction the cash flows. Run a hit piece on a certain CEO/CO., people sell they're stocks. Run a good piece on CEO/CO stocks are bought. Do a hit piece on a certain Airline company/cruise ship people choose another company. On and on, they certainly can persuade where the money goes.

Correct, there is a rather disturbing story about a guy who shorted herbalife I think. then spent his energy, money trying to disparage them in every way possible working in the press to get the stock to drop. It's not hard to buy a reporter is it Mr. Wolfe?

a reply to: seyance

It’s a way to imply Obama is homosexual, they are the deplorables for a reason

a reply to: Sabrechucker

I agree:

1) Bullet point 9 has 8 periods (well - 2 ellipsis and 2 periods). This could reference the 8th (tomorrow),

2) With a bullet list each should normally be followed by a comma and the last by a period. In the (1) to (9) list the period is on the 8th (there we go again with the 8s),

3) There are a LOT of repetitions of words, many x3 but some up to 9. I'm going to play with those words and see if they build a sentence using the number of occurrences as the sequence. I'll post the result separately,

4) "Scandalous Media Bias" is an odd capitalisation. SMB is an acronym for Shared Mailbox = googlemail drafts used as comms,

a reply to: Whereismypassword

When will you stop blaming Russia for everything and realize that our elected officials are the real evil?

If you're so scared of them, get a damn dog.

a reply to: seyance

Ummmmm, my eyes?

Spanish is a language.
Math is a language.
Art is a language.
Code is a language.
Facial expressions are a language.
Symbols are a language.

Q drops are a new language. Unless you understand the language, the symbols are gibberish. Yet, oddly, a person not familiar with computer code does not scream at programmers calling their observations about coding, the language, gibberish. Curious.

Interesting how certain posts make you "feel" something. How come those with so little to say seem to create a certain feeling, a feeling NONE of my posts create, or Rel's that matter which deal with the emerging language connections. Why don't my posts inspire people to hate and anger?

Learn their comms.

originally posted by: PurpleFox
a reply to: Whereismypassword

When will you stop blaming Russia for everything and realize that our elected officials are the real evil?

If you're so scared of them, get a damn dog.

I’m from Salisbury I ain’t scared of Russians

It’s a known fact Russians are pushing their anti west narrative, they are using twitter to push fake stories and exploit BOTH sides of the political spectrum

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: Sabrechucker

I agree:

1) Bullet point 9 has 8 periods (well - 2 ellipsis and 2 periods). This could reference the 8th (tomorrow),

2) With a bullet list each should normally be followed by a comma and the last by a period. In the (1) to (9) list the period is on the 8th (there we go again with the 8s),

3) There are a LOT of repetitions of words, many x3 but some up to 9. I'm going to play with those words and see if they build a sentence using the number of occurrences as the sequence. I'll post the result separately,

4) "Scandalous Media Bias" is an odd capitalisation. SMB is an acronym for Shared Mailbox = googlemail drafts used as comms,

The 8th, 8-8, is a lot of the reason for the madness. Once this point is complete, that's it.

a reply to: daskakik

Sure, and I doubt anyone here would deny that there are possibly some 'alternative facts'. (Okay, just kidding).

Our 'Q' claims to be a group of less than 10 Whitehouse insiders, three of which are regular civilians and the rest are Military Intelligence with 'Q-clearance' (security level) - an extraordinary claim, for sure.

There are several alternative theories:

1. Q is one person with a vast knowledge of the political landscape and with an incredible amount of free time on his/her hands to do research, create elaborate cryptic messages, post same to a message board, keep track of his/her LARPful lies, all from his/her mother's basement;
2. Q is Trump/Melania/Baron (who is a genius/autist);
3. Q is any number of people close to Trump;
4. Q is a group of leftists/anarchists/Marxists;
5. Q was originally the 4chan B/O but now is compromised, co-opted by Russians/other Anons/[fill in the blank];
5. Q was all along/is a Russian clandestine psyop operation;
6. Q is Pamphlet and Wife, et al from CBTS;
7. Q is......

The fact remains that, whoever Q is, Q has been driven into the (main)stream of consciousness. It has almost risen to a mythical level with epic proportions; has entered the common lexicon; has woken millions upon millions of people up to the sick reality of the world we live in; has done so in merely, what, 8 or 9 months; and managed to do all of this using veiled and puzzling one-liners while leading everyone to GREAT research.

You can't win. I think the phenomenon of Q will outlast anybody's speculations; it has inspired a social movement interested in diving deeply into the weeds, one that has become a worldwide collaborative effort that isn't going to disappear any time soon.

a reply to: pavil

What exactly was a false assumption in my post?

I doubt anyone will be changing their minds barring some really big revelations till then.

Well I just managed to change one members mind on a satantic Obama picture by providing them some evidence/proof they hadn't previously seen. And they accepted it. So it can be done. On both sides.

Getting defensive over nothing posts isn't helping. Post evidence. If you post opinion expect it to be debated. Post convincing proof and you'll find people will find it harder to rip it apart.

a reply to: PokeyJoe

Oh my bad. I assumed you had some sort of proof. Your attitude seemed to suggest as such.

Do you still think its Obama in the photo?

a reply to: seyance

The problem is when people start spewing garbage and stating opinions as facts.

Real discussion and researches are being compromised because the bull# is consuming the pages.

I’m ALL for healthy discussions and as I’ve stated many times I’m neither a believer nor a skeptic. I’m just waiting to be convinced.

But with all the thread-drift lately, I can’t see any more evidences and the debunkers hardly peovide anything substantial other than personal attacks and/or opinions.

originally posted by: Whereismypassword

originally posted by: CoramDeo

originally posted by: Whereismypassword
a reply to: ModusPonus

Do you guys actualy follow real events in the news?

You mean like on Buzzfeed?

www.bbc.co.uk...

Wow. That is a terrific article.

Depth: 7/10, pretty solid.

I liked this part:

It is common for US politicians to research their opponents during a campaign.
However, legal experts say that Mr Trump Jr could fall foul of campaign finance laws, which prohibit accepting anything of value from a foreign government or foreign national.

Here's the law, 11 CFR 110.20 - Prohibition on contributions, donations, expenditures, independent expenditures, and disbursements by foreign nationals (52 U.S.C. 30121, 36 U.S.C. 510).

It's not Buzzfeed, or BBC, but its pretty good.

But wait a second, "...which prohibit accepting anything of value from a foreign government or foreign national."

Wait, wasn't Chrisotopher Steele both a foreign national and involved with MI6 or 5 or....you get it?

See, the difference is actual payment. The DNC was actually paying a foreign agent for opposition research.

Sort of hard to tiptoe over that fact.

Just for you, though, here's some red meat, real journalism.

They focus like a laser on the unfounded sins of the Trump campaign, but it is illustrative and informative bacause it helps to highlight the actual sins of the DNC without saying a word.

Good journalism sometimes does that.

For your enjoyment: Campaign Finance Law: When “Collusion” with a Foreign Government Becomes a Crime

Parts two and tree follow-on articles are at the bottom of the page.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Nice work!

4) "Scandalous Media Bias" is an odd capitalisation. SMB is an acronym for Shared Mailbox = googlemail drafts used as comms,

SMBMedia?www.emarketer.com...

originally posted by: Whereismypassword

originally posted by: tiredoflooking
a reply to: Gandalf77

WRONG.

Many who support truth are interested in understanding what Q is about.

I am the furthest thing from right wing.

MANY many lefties are joining #walkaway

We are all kinds of people just seeking #Truth

Walkway is a Russian operation 🐸

It's not a Russian operation.

Dems are creating it all on their own.

a reply to: introvert

Another theory.

a reply to: Sabrechucker

SMB Media group based in Morristown, New Jersey. I'm pretty sure we have investigated other companies in Morristown (just can't remember which).