It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: shawmanfromny
That object could have been tiny and 2 inches from the camera.
Please explain your reasoning for thinking it is large and far away.
originally posted by: smurfy
Very naughty weather lady....time lapse pictures, allowing a fast replay....star shows a few degrees of movement in that time....so object not quick at all. She should have expanded on that.
originally posted by: smurfy
Very naughty weather lady....time lapse pictures, allowing a fast replay....star shows a few degrees of movement in that time....so object not quick at all. She should have expanded on that.
Your theory on turbulence is weak.
In addition, this object was caught on time lapse, so it's moving much too slow to be any kind of plane.
In addition, this object was caught on time lapse, so it's moving much too slow to be any kind of plane.
so any landing and nav lights would of been captured on video.
Time lapsed footage shows an unknown object appear out of a cloud and move past the camera.
Balloon? Chinese Lantern? Drone? Orb? You decide.
but the luminous light is moving much to slow to be an aircraft of any sort.
this object travels right above the camera
I think this was some sort of drone at first
or do you still think it's a smaller, closer object?
See my latest post, where I claim that the object is more likely a plane.