Were California and Greece Attacked By Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs)?

a reply to: BotheLumberJack

Ok, here goes...

But I must ask why you take liberalism standing up? I mean, it's all #sht too right? If i'm wrong about your affiliation please, correct me.

In order to have a problem with liberalism, you must first misunderstand its intent, or be dead wrong about who is and who is not liberal. Again, the usual suspects are nothing to do with it. Soros is nothing to do with liberalism or leftist thinking, neither is Clinton or anyone she has ever spent time with on any other basis than out of necessity. The philosophy I hold close, is one which believes in the following:

Freedom, liberty, and equality as a defining element of the first two, since no person who can be treated as a second class citizen is in possession of their liberty or can have any true freedom.

That is the central core of it. I also believe that work must pay a living wage, or the position not be offered at all, regardless of how menial and lowly it might be, whether its flipping burgers or helping flip a house. Everyone employed should be employed at a wage rate and number of hours per week, which permits them to rent or purchase a home, feed and clothe themselves and those they are responsible for (kids and such), AND save for the future.

I also believe that our responsibility on this Earth, both from a practical point of view, and from the perspective of a Christian man, is that we are to be stewards of this Earth, to benefit from its bounty, yes, but also to protect it from the worst we have to offer it. If that means ceasing all forms of mineral burning methods of producing power, then so be it, and the first to quit that behaviour, must be those who benefit the most from it financially.

That does not mean that I have any love for those who waltz about screaming about the environment, writing blogs from their private jets, or getting weepy on seven different networks news shows, having driven a super sized SUV between each one. All it means is that I have a proper sense of whats going on in the world, and what the real priorities are. Cutting off all oil production, ceasing all nuclear plant use, and FORCING government to change its attitudes to renewables is PRIME, it is an absolute, a red line, it MUST occur without fault, failure or exception, before another decade passes if we can manage it, and at whatever cost is necessary to achieve it, including the collapse of idiotically leveraged currencies. I say that because any nation stupid enough to be interested in a currency whose worth and ease of use depends on oil prices, is stupid enough to suffer for its own ignorance eventually.

However I see a World run by puppets attempting to trick us into doing what they will. I'm not buying it anymore. A healthy understanding of this should be taught to the young, but instead, they're being taught the opposite. The entire education system has turned into a political circus act and for whom?

For Them. And only Them.

This them... who are they? The only "Them" out there worth being concerned about the motives of, are the oil barons and energy companies more generally, who have been deliberately stifling, curtailing and defunding every possible route to power production that either burns no fuel at all, or cannot be easily monetised. With the greatest respect to the captains of industry, their lives mean nothing, their luxuries being upheld are not important, their comfort is irrelevant. I do not care about it. I care about there being a planet worth living on for my child, for his children, his childrens children. The oil cartels can starve to death for all I care, which is exactly how they feel about us, by they way.

Its true that education is not what it ought to be. People fool kids into believing that you can be a lover of freedom and a far right loony at the same time, even though the two are mutually exclusive. People fool kids into thinking that protecting themselves is the same as bullying. People fool kids into believing that neoclassical economics and the capitalist model are working, that hegemony is the best we can hope for. The hell with all those things, and thousands more. But education in STEM subjects is not that way. Getting educated in science and technology will show any reasonable person, that the way of life they are forced to participate in, is skewed to produce a dead world, potentially within a human lifetime, or at least one far less pleasant to live on than we currently have at our feet.

To object to the aspects of liberalism which pertain specifically to the matter we are discussing, it is necessary for a person to either be ideologically incapable of changing their minds to fit the facts, or have insufficient knowledge to make wise decisions as to how they are going to act, or for that matter, vote.

Liberalism is not a dirty word, it is not a dirty thing, no matter how much those appeasing the corporatism would like to make it so. Even Clinton has no power to dirty the liberal ideal, because she is not liberal but a corporatist, therefore no association can accurately be drawn between her and those who actually, genuinely LIVE its principles.

a reply to: TrueBrit

Ok i partially stopped reading at this..

Soros is nothing to do with liberalism or leftist thinking, neither is Clinton or anyone she has ever spent time with on any other basis than out of necessity.

I don't believe you're right on this, on any level. The man is an nutcase and has been banned in Russia for dirty deals and trying to create societal problems outside of his jurisdiction. Clinton, is a scape goat and a blood sucker. I have little if anything to say about her.

Liberal was not a dirty word in the 50s, 60's and 70's. Now Liberalism = Crazy and I'd need a whole lot of bubble gum for that one..

a reply to: TrueBrit

adding, I appreciate the input from you on it. Thank you. I can be blunt at times, but i'm passionate about what I believe, which is different from being a dink. Just so you didn't think I was one.

The picture in the 1st page is not caused by wildfires but is not caused by DEW either. It's caused by terrorist migrants blocking traffic and torching cars.

Greece , together with Spain and Portugal, under order from Brussels and Strasbourg are running concentration camps and training camps for homeless and refugees, to be trained as saboteurs. Some of these terrorists may have been employed to plant the bomb that exploded at the Kerch School today, under EU-NATO-UK orders.

Moreover, they are running slave camps and concentration camps to produe brainwashed people and prostitutes.
Some sort of FemaCamps on steroids for nefarious purposes exclusively.

Meanwhile california is attacked typically by EU pyromaniacs, who put forest fires around . At the same time the EU military use weather weapons to create the droughts that attempt to support the pro climate change / global warming discussions. This of course favors the forest fires, and favors any political force that supports the idea of man made global disasters due to industrialization.

a reply to: Flanker86

Right, because everyone knows there's no such thing as a drought. It's OBVIOUSLY the EU.

... not only that, but now EU Illuminati, especially the black nobility are using Greece as a place to kidnap children for to satisfy their pedophile addiction by bringing them to concentration camps where they are then sold or used for child porn movies.

Why hasn't Alexis Tsipras been hanged yet for high treason in favour of EU nazi occupation ?

originally posted by: Komodo
a reply to: face23785

from a Dr. back in 2001, investigated this theory fully and I personally think she did a great job.. she also thinks DEW's were used as well, evidence suggests from video footage of the radio tower turning completely into dust right where it was; she suggested this could only be done by extreme heat from DEW's.

It's definetly a workable theory .. IMO ..

in 2001 Dr, I assume you are talking about Judy Wood investigated Fires in Greece from 2018?

No tower turned into dust, on you tube videos it looks like it does and narrators of those video tell you it does which then leads one to ask how easy are those that believe that crap manipulated by simple words and moving pictures in low res.

Greece was not attacked by direct energy weapons, it was sacrificed by the EU, in order to start a new war against Russia, which they lost again !

Between 2005 and 2009 the EU-NATO launched a financial-economic war against Russia committing immense resources in that war. They lost, and with a "hat trick" they blamed Greece and pensioneers for their defeat !
And the national hero Tsipras agreed with them, submitting to all demands, without ever flinching while Greece got destroyed .... congrats !

So greece was destroyed to pay EU-NATO's debt caused by that war . What about NOW ? Meaning now that the EU has lost another war against Russia during the past 2-3 years ?

Who do they dump their blame on for losing ? I think it will be Croatia, Slovenia, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Romania, Bulgaria .... and maybe a few more , if they aren't already paying their price for joining the great NAZI empire.

Ah, how? What? huh? Explain your theory in more detail.

The economic crisis in Greece is a result of governments poor management since the 80's & the Euro and EU (ie read Germany).

Since the 80's when Greece returned to being a democracy after the fall of the dictatorship, Greek governments have largely been socialist, and even when the conservative New Democracy party was in government they still maintained similar socialist policies overall. By socialist policies I refer to running budget deficits, and an ever growing public sector, all the while the private sector and foreign investments were neglected.

Along comes the Euro. Even easier now to get more credit at lower rates. And that's what they did.

There was even the so called 13th pension. That is, a 13th monthly payment. But wait, there's only 12 months in a year. See what I mean about socialist policies leading to disaster?

People often blame hosting the Olympics or defence spending as the reasons behind the economic crisis. They had nothing to do with the economic crisis. Because the overall money spent on defence over the years wasn't that high, and by the time the Olympics returned home to Greece the budget had been in deficit for decades and a huge debt had already been amassed.

Now, what most people don't know is that Greece's politicians as well as being highly corrupt and sell outs against their own people/country, are actually all mostly foreign agents. Papandreou Jnr, who was Prime Minister when the crisis officially started, along with Samaras and a few others, all went to college in the US and were all part of secret societies while there. Papandreou is a CIA asset. Karamanlis was targeted for assassination by the CIA for trying to do an energy deal with Russia that involved pipelines coming from the Black Sea through Bulgaria into Thrace(Northern Greece). The Russians tipped off the Greeks. The massive unrest that preceded Papandreou Jnr becoming PM, was orchestrated by the CIA and their assets in Greece to bring down the Karamanlis government. As soon as he became PM, the unrest stopped. Not suspicious at all. They of course blame it on the Police shooting of a teenager instead.

What Greece needed was not bailouts and German enforced anti-humane barbaric austerity that was more about Merkel punishing Greece for helping turn the tide against her Hitler heroes.

What it needed was in fact economic reforms and spending cuts. Like all western governments implement to get their economies back on track. But what Papandreou Jnr did was pull the trigger on the crisis and go to the EU and IMF. Not even attempting to pass economic reforms and budget reforms. Why? Because he wasn't serving the Greek people and nation, he was serving foreign interests. And it was in their interest for the economic crisis to be triggered in Greece, with it's huge debt.

Now why you ask? Because the financial system in Europe, namely the big German and French banks were in trouble.
Do you ever wonder why Greece's debt has increased, not as a percentage because of a decline in GDP figures, but as an actual figure it self? Greece was bailed out yes? Why did it's debt increase as a figure then? So you thought. What really happened was the bad debts that had those big Euro banks in trouble, were dumped on Greece in the form of bailouts. The European tax payers in their respective countries who contributed to these alleged bail outs for Greece, were duped by their own governments and the unelected EU bureaucracy monster. Greece was the scapegoat, the sacrificial lamb. The over the top austerity was forced by Germany, over WW2. It still owes Greece billions in reparations, as it agreed to revisit the issue after east/west unification.

It's a multi faceted issue. It was brought down because they needed a scapegoat for Europe's wider economic issues. Notice how much of the debt was supposedly written off? That's because they realized that if they did dump it all on Greece and leave it there, Greece would buckle and jump out of the EU and Euro, and THAT would have a destabilizing effect as other struggling EU countries would say # it and jump out as well. At the very least it would have given a major boost to the EU skeptics.

The other is as I mentioned, the Karamanlis government wanting to do a pipeline deal with Russia. That went against US foreign policy for European energy, that is they want to cut off Russia from being a major supplier to Europe because that weakens Russia as it removes a huge tool for leverage over Europe.

If you take note that the East Mediterranean today is a hot bed of activity. It's not a coincidence.

First it started with Israel "discovering" gas and some oil off it's shores. Then Cyprus got in the game and contracted the same US company to do exploration, and they too found gas reserves. Then Greece got in on the action too.
Today there is an East Med coalition between those three countries, with cooperation with Egypt and Libya, all overseen by the USA. Turkey is the big loser at the moment. How it all plays out is another story that we will see unfold in the coming years.
Of course, it's been known for decades that there is a great wealth of gas and oil in the eastern Mediterranean and Aegean & Ionian seas. This is information that has been buried in Greece, despite the great economic benefits it would have brought to Greece for decades now. However, through corrupt politicians/governments controlled by the USA/EU, nothing was done. They sat on it. Now however, when Greece has been weakened further, and it's in US interests, they are starting to explore those resources and will soon exploit them. Of course there is the obligatory Greek and Israeli companies, even joint ventures with Cypriot entities involved, but the big winners financially will be the major western companies. Exxon, TOTAL, ENI...etc.

Why is Turkey in Libya? Because Libya agreed to Greece's EEZ, which is against Turkeys claims. So they want to bring in a pro Turkey regime.

As for the wildfires, they are often used as a political tool to put pressure on government, or to distract from other issues. Of course there is a large amount started by natural causes, ie lightning strikes. June 2018 there was close to 100,000 lightning strikes in Greece.
Property owners/developers who want to build something somewhere that is covered by forest. Greed and corruption basically.
Foreign agents, such as from Turkey. It's a form of psychological warfare of sorts, and an attempt at economic sabotage. Summer is peak tourist season.
And in recent times, illegal immigrants have been caught starting fires. Why? Because they don't get what they want, they act out in rage. Even more reason to deport them all and turn them all away, besides the fact they don't belong in western countries to begin with.

There's been a lot of footage of mysterious individuals, faces concealed, starting fires.
There's even aerial footage of people starting fires.
I've even seen aerial footage of multiple fires igniting out of thin air. What caused it? Who knows. Maybe glass bottles/broken glass shards..something which happens in Australia.

Maybe it is some sort of super weapon starting fires at times? There's been an increase in major fires occurring all over the world in recent times. Coinciding with a major push of the global warming/climate change agendas. Coincidence?

a reply to: Flanker86

a reply to: face23785

Made me think of a Fresnel Lens. This video shows what it can do with just focusing the suns heat to melt steel and glass in seconds. Not sure If tech is out there to do that on a larger scale,


And I just found this


Anyway, now getting into crazy talk.

Story I’m told here in Nor Cal is Fires were caused by poor planning by local power company, not properly maintained power line towers. PG&E.

a reply to: Observationalist

Not sure why it reminds you of that. As I pointed out, the steel in the cars is clearly left intact in the pictures supposedly "proving" it's not a wildfire.

That tech is really cool though.

a reply to: face23785

So the steel being intact means it wasnt a natural wild fire but was caused by non existant energy weapons?

You've obviously never seen a bush fire in Australia.

originally posted by: mortex
a reply to: face23785

So the steel being intact means it wasnt a natural wild fire but was caused by non existant energy weapons?

You've obviously never seen a bush fire in Australia.

Did you read the OP or my other posts in here? How exactly do you get the impression I'm saying it was a DEW. All my posts, including the OP, have indicated that it's not.

Look, funny weather in NATO Greece www.youtube.com...

They managed to get a MIRVed lightning strike Where's Tsipras, when he's needed to invoke Article 5 against the clouds ?

Yesteryear, Paradise.

Already halfway through current year and they already burned down 21 THOUSAND acres of California land.

Where next?!

originally posted by: Flanker86
Look, funny weather in NATO Greece www.youtube.com...

They managed to get a MIRVed lightning strike

Where's Tsipras, when he's needed to invoke Article 5 against the clouds ?

Firstly, Tsipras isn't Prime Minister anymore. There were elections the other weekend, he lost, and New Democracy party won and Kyriakos Mitsotakis is the Prime Minister now. But you're not really concerned about what's happening in Greece, or any country, rather you want to push some nonsense about a storm and lightning being modified weather by NATO or whomever.

Secondly, there's nothing funny about the storms that occurred, especially when people died in those storms. Many more were injured, and financial losses incurred.

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: mortex
a reply to: face23785

So the steel being intact means it wasnt a natural wild fire but was caused by non existant energy weapons?

You've obviously never seen a bush fire in Australia.

Did you read the OP or my other posts in here? How exactly do you get the impression I'm saying it was a DEW. All my posts, including the OP, have indicated that it's not.

I didn't quote all your posts, I quoted a specific post where you said the vehicles steel being left in tact proves it's not a wild fire.
My response was you've clearly never seen a bush fire in Australia. There's decades old footage and photos where everything is scorched and burned to the ground, but then there's a few car shells left. There's also plenty of photos showing cars completely destroyed.

But lets ignore all the factors involved, like the varying environments, the urban environments and so on. Let's just be pig headed westerners who think that everything all over the world is like we have at home. And then when end results are different, let's look for conspiracy theories about magical weapons that cause targeted bush fires that can be turned off so that specific cars or buildings are left untouched.

Or like the other guy above posted, magical lightning weapons.