It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Prosecutor General’s Office of Russia named the names of employees of special services and US officials suspected of involvement in the illegal activities of the founder of the British Hermitage Fund William Browder, reports Interfax . Among them was the former US ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul, to whom Russian investigators want to ask a number of questions.
The names of Americans who are interested in the Russian investigation were voiced by the head of the Office of the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation Alexander Kurennoy. “I will mention some of them: they are employees of the US National Security Agency: Todd Hyman, he signed an oath in the US court, according to Browder, Svetlana Engert took the stolen materials of the criminal case from Russia, Alexander Shvartsman, who was in charge of Browder during his stay in the US , Jim Roht, a CIA agent who in fact was and is the financial manager of Browder, Robert Otto, until January 2017, the Deputy Chief of the US Intelligence Agency, David Kramer.
According to him, among the persons of interest are also “well-known Michael McFaul, former US ambassador to Russia.”
originally posted by: MiddleInsite
a reply to: xuenchen
Well, now we know some of what Trump and Putin spoke of in private. I'm sure Trump was very helpful in which intel agents and ambassadors to go after. Trump probably told Putin all sorts of top secret stuff. How would we know? And you can't say he didn't do what I am saying because you guys know as much as I do about what was said. So it would be your speculation against mine.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen
Sure he does. He wants his money back and that only happens if the Magnitsky act is repealed.
originally posted by: rickymouse
Russia actually has a legitimate claim with Browder from what I have read. Calling in people to testify under oath about any involvement with or for information about Browder activity would be appropriate.
Of course it will never happen, just like Russia not giving up the people that FBI wants.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: neo96
The "Open Borders" Democrats screwed themselves today too. 35 of them voted to disband ICE. The rest voted to support ICE.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: rickymouse
Russia actually has a legitimate claim with Browder from what I have read. Calling in people to testify under oath about any involvement with or for information about Browder activity would be appropriate.
Of course it will never happen, just like Russia not giving up the people that FBI wants.
Browder was stuttering and spitting while he spoke today. The guy is SCARED.
originally posted by: pteridine
originally posted by: MiddleInsite
a reply to: xuenchen
Well, now we know some of what Trump and Putin spoke of in private. I'm sure Trump was very helpful in which intel agents and ambassadors to go after. Trump probably told Putin all sorts of top secret stuff. How would we know? And you can't say he didn't do what I am saying because you guys know as much as I do about what was said. So it would be your speculation against mine.
My bet is that Trump had no idea which intel agents and ambassadors to go after. The Russians knew who to go after and maybe Putin decided that turnabout was a good idea. Maybe they even discussed what he was planning.