Lisa Page told Congress that the Chinese (not Russians) stole Hillary's e-mails.

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Middleoftheroad


What do you expect her lawyer to say? "It's just the tip of the iceberg?"

Her lawyer pointed out exactly what the criminal complaint discussed. She was trying to find ways to improve US and Russia relations. The only illegal act is her procedure to act in this manner, which is currently just an accusation. So it seems like a big nothing-burger to me. Please point out in the criminal complaint you linked that is such a huge story or did you just waste my time with a document you haven’t even read? Oh and you do realize this whole thing happened during Obama’s admin right?

originally posted by: pavil
a reply to: DJW001

Watch the Nunes interview with Maria Bartimatolo on CNBC this past Sunday.

Nunes has no credibility.

Flynn in 2015 - and you wonder why he was taken down

a reply to: DJW001

Ummm...unsubstantiated deductive reasoning is not "proof" of anything--it's best not to make claims based on logical fallacies in order to support an ideological assumption.

Just throwing that out there as a public-service announcement.

a reply to: Middleoftheroad

Oh and you do realize this whole thing happened during Obama’s admin right?

When all else fails, Obama. Russia has been cultivating "conservative" politicians for years. The NRA has been funding them with money provided by Russia, and inundating its members with propaganda designed to heighten social tension. That, too, serves Russian interests.

a reply to: DJW001

The NRA has been funding them with money provided by Russia, and inundating its members with propaganda designed to heighten social tension.

Maybe they learned from the BEST!

Now wut?

a reply to: Allaroundyou

it was faster that made it an inside job . This was the DNC server if you are talking about something else I will stand corrected

a reply to: IAMTAT

Good one

“True Pindit,” I predict, will be shown for what it is eventually: a pure propaganda outlet to benefit Trump.

I think whomever anonymously runs it has a rather pressing reason to deflect strongly on the issue of Trump/Russia, especially after the Helinski debacle. I think this article is a sign of desperation. “How do we spin? How do we pivot? Create a totally new narrative!!!”

Meh.

But, whatever. Keep believing what you will...

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan


The old McAffee anti-virus that Hillary and the DNC used was no match for the Russians, Chinese, or even a Freshman at any Tech College.

Top Secret and Sensitive info is now all over the world, thanks to Hillary and the Dims.

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Middleoftheroad

Oh and you do realize this whole thing happened during Obama’s admin right?

When all else fails, Obama. Russia has been cultivating "conservative" politicians for years. The NRA has been funding them with money provided by Russia, and inundating its members with propaganda designed to heighten social tension. That, too, serves Russian interests.

Couldn’t refute it, so you deflect even more. Have a good day, I’ll keep my discussions with the more stable posters.

a reply to: Middleoftheroad

I do have to say.

Those that demagogue an organization that lobbys to keep us armed isn't stable.

Domestic terrorists are the ones that try to disarm us.

a reply to: MetalThunder

Wow. This isn't even a new claim. Flynn knew the truth 3 years ago.

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: pavil
a reply to: DJW001

Watch the Nunes interview with Maria Bartimatolo on CNBC this past Sunday.

Nunes has no credibility.

Then we have nothing to discuss if you are to close your mind off.

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: pavil
a reply to: DJW001

Watch the Nunes interview with Maria Bartimatolo on CNBC this past Sunday.

Nunes has no credibility.

And yet you'll take Chuck Schumer's word without question.

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: pavil
a reply to: DJW001

Watch the Nunes interview with Maria Bartimatolo on CNBC this past Sunday.

Nunes has no credibility.

And yet you'll take Chuck Schumer's word without question.

Of course they will, and they'll ignore this snip while they're at it.

www.nbcnews.com...

a reply to: Middleoftheroad

They didn't have to give away any passwords. Podesta password was literally Password1234!

originally posted by: DJMSN
a reply to: Middleoftheroad

They didn't have to give away any passwords. Podesta password was literally Password1234!

Actually, it was P@ssword1234

He apparently thought he was being clever with the l33t speek.
How cute!

I think that some posters are mixing things up a bit.
This article is specifically talking about Hillary's private server, not the DNC/Wikileaks hack.

I am not surprised that MSM would not report this if true. I guess we will need to see if Congress will tell us.

The IG report said that there was a chance that her private server, with classified information, was accessed by foreigners.

So, if this article is true and Lisa Page spilled the beans:
Besides the obvious danger that a great deal of classified information fell into the hands of China because Clinton was "careless", there is a bigger issue.
The FBI covered it up. They did not report it. They did not investigate it. They did not place the blame were it belongs - on Hillary Clinton.

a reply to: neo96

What does a fifteen year old video have to do with anything?
Did he have a behind closed doors meeting with him where he agreed to....stuff
Because Russia is already hinting they're ready to move on some agreement.