It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: BlueAjah
Did you forget that Mr. Strzok also went to London to acquire intelligence from the Austrialian Ambassador?
Which resulted apparently in the Russia-Trump Campaign Investigation?
In what context did Simpson say that "Fusion GPS did not speak to the FBI"?
Not to put too fine an edge on it, I've noticed on many occasions that you tend to relay information in the way that best suits your narrative.
A. From Fusion, did anyone from Fusion
communicate with the FBI?
A. No, no one from Fusion
ever spoke with the FBI, to the best of my
knowledge.
Q. Did you ever exchange any e-mails with
them?
A. We did not communicate with them by e-mail
either.
SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
U.S. SENATE
WASHINGTON, D.C.
INTERVIEW OF: GLENN SIMPSON
TUESDAY, AUGUST 22, 2017
WASHINGTON, D.C.
The interview in this matter was held at the
Hart Senate Office Building, commencing at 9:34 a.m.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: vinifalou
That's not hard for anyone to believe. What's so hard to believe that the IG determined that bias didn't enter his work. Also don't forget he was not working alone on this. He had people above him and below him to verify and keep him honest. Or was the whole department in on it?
“We were deeply troubled by text messages sent by Strzok and Page that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations,”
“It is not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even more seriously, implies a willingness to take official action to impact the presidential candidate’s electoral prospects,” the IG said.
"Strzok’s decision to prioritize the Russia investigation over following up on the midyear-related investigative lead discovered on the [Anthony] Weiner laptop in October 2016, these text messages led us to conclude that we did not have confidence that Strzok’s decision was free from bias.”
originally posted by: RetsuUnohana
a reply to: carewemust
Did you see the part where he said "I could smell the Trump supporters" . Than says i'm not bias. Hahahaha okay...
It is the height of ignorance, for a seemingly educated man, to believe he can simply "turn of" his biases when doing his job.
deeply troubled. Aw shucks.
originally posted by: vinifalou
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: vinifalou
That's not hard for anyone to believe. What's so hard to believe that the IG determined that bias didn't enter his work. Also don't forget he was not working alone on this. He had people above him and below him to verify and keep him honest. Or was the whole department in on it?
Since you and Gyph use the same arguments, I'll drop this for ya too.
“We were deeply troubled by text messages sent by Strzok and Page that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations,”
Wait there's more.
“It is not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even more seriously, implies a willingness to take official action to impact the presidential candidate’s electoral prospects,” the IG said.
One more in case you're still confuse...
"Strzok’s decision to prioritize the Russia investigation over following up on the midyear-related investigative lead discovered on the [Anthony] Weiner laptop in October 2016, these text messages led us to conclude that we did not have confidence that Strzok’s decision was free from bias.”
No bias, you say?
Prove it.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: BlueAjah
Beliefs again. No facts just beliefs.
originally posted by: vinifalou
a reply to: carewemust
With all the nonsense garbage the Democrats were asking him I lost interest and stopped watching the hearing, so I wouldn't know.
They most probably asked him how was his family doing, what's he doing on the weekend, etc.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: BlueAjah
Beliefs again. No facts just beliefs.
originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: Sillyolme
Hah.
I will ignore that, since posting history shows that I provide quotes and sources to support statements in my posts about 1000/1 compared to your posts.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
deeply troubled. Aw shucks.
originally posted by: vinifalou
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: vinifalou
That's not hard for anyone to believe. What's so hard to believe that the IG determined that bias didn't enter his work. Also don't forget he was not working alone on this. He had people above him and below him to verify and keep him honest. Or was the whole department in on it?
Since you and Gyph use the same arguments, I'll drop this for ya too.
“We were deeply troubled by text messages sent by Strzok and Page that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations,”
Wait there's more.
“It is not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even more seriously, implies a willingness to take official action to impact the presidential candidate’s electoral prospects,” the IG said.
One more in case you're still confuse...
"Strzok’s decision to prioritize the Russia investigation over following up on the midyear-related investigative lead discovered on the [Anthony] Weiner laptop in October 2016, these text messages led us to conclude that we did not have confidence that Strzok’s decision was free from bias.”
No bias, you say?
Prove it.
No I didn't say no bias Ajah I said the IG report determined that he didn't let it effect his work.
Big difference!
“We were deeply troubled by text messages sent by Strzok and Page that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations,”
“It is not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even more seriously, implies a willingness to take official action to impact the presidential candidate’s electoral prospects,” the IG said.