It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“Deputy Director McCabe testified before the committee in December 2017 that no surveillance warrant would have been sought from the FISC without the Steele dossier information,” the memo said, referring to FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, who stepped down from that job this week.
A key question is what evidence was used to secure warrants from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court resulting in wiretaps on Trump associates, including Page. The Steele dossier is filled with unverified allegations about Trump’s connections to Russia, some of them salacious.
Did the FBI and Justice Department use Steele’s information to get the FISA warrant? One certainly hopes not, for two salient reasons. First, the dossier, particularly as it relates to Page, is incredibly far-fetched. I am assuming that, at the time it began receiving the dossier reports, the FBI did not know that Steele was working for the Clinton campaign — indeed, we do not yet know whether Steele himself knew who, ultimately, was paying for his work. If the bureau were aware of the Clinton campaign’s role, using the dossier would be indefensible. We should assume for now, though, that if investigators were scrupulous enough to resist seeking a warrant for Page while he was officially connected to the Trump campaign, they would doubly have avoided using one campaign’s information as a basis for spying on its opposition. Nevertheless, the explosive information was unverified. There were abundant reasons to doubt its veracity when it came to Page. And the FBI could easily have taken measures less drastic than seeking court-ordered surveillance; it could, for example, have interviewed Page, who had cooperated with the FBI in the past.
The second reason to hope the dossier was not used is more alarming. If the FBI and Justice Department relied on it, this would very likely mean that they fell victim to an influence operation, based on false information, by Russian intelligence services. Steele’s sources are unidentified Russians, at least some of whom knew Steele to be a spy for hire. It is possible, if not likely, that these Russians fed Steele false information in order to see if Western intelligence services would bite and, if the Kremlin got lucky, to sow discord and chaos into the American political system. I hope they did not succeed, but we need to find out.
One more disturbing fact: Because Page is a U.S. citizen, the Justice Department and FBI would have had to show the FISA court not only that he was acting as a foreign agent for Russia but that his activities involved or may have involved violations of federal criminal statutes. (See Section 1801(b)(2) of Title 50, U.S. Code.) I don’t know of any basis for attributing criminal activity to Page other than the Steele dossier — but, of course, I don’t know everything the FBI knows.
The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia judge presiding over the criminal case for President Donald Trump’s former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn has been recused from handling the case, a court spokeswoman said on Thursday. According to a court filing, U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras, who presided over a Dec. 1 hearing where Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to the Federal Bureau of Investigation about his contacts with Russia, will no longer handle the case. Court spokeswoman Lisa Klem did not say why Contreras was recused, and added that the case was randomly reassigned.
Peter Strzok, a top FBI counterintelligence agent who exchanged anti-Trump messages with his mistress, had a personal relationship with the federal judge who recused himself from overseeing former national security adviser Michael Flynn’s case last year, according to a new report.
The relationship between Strzok and U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras, who was appointed to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, was disclosed in text messages between Strzok and FBI attorney Lisa Page, and obtained by Fox News.
“Rudy is on the FISC! Did you know that?” Page said in a text to Strzok in July 2016. “Just appointed two months ago.” “I did,” Strozk said in response. “We talked about it before and after. I need to get together with him.” The two also discussed how Strzok needed to be careful about what he discussed with Contreras to avoid putting him “into a situation where he’d have to recuse himself.”
originally posted by: vinifalou
a reply to: Gryphon66
He took his political inclination inside the office, being in charge of an investigation, who was looking at the opposition candidate, and his texts proved he had a bias. He didn't wanted Trump to get elected and he said he was going to stop him.
Is that so hard for you to understand? Or you're just playing dumb?
Rhetorical question, btw.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Gryphon66
Funny you choose not to dispute the Mccabe quote about the fisa warrant.
Funny you choose not to discuss Contreras.
No worries, the IG is still working and the report from "crossfire hurricane" will be released. Interesting how Strzok keeps showing up at key points of both investigations.
Funny you seemed to have been against the government spying on its citizens without cause in the past.
It is and has been well-known that the raw intelligence material GATHERED by Chris Steele for Fusion GPS CORROBORATED other information that had been gathered in the investigation including material from the AUSTRAILIAN AMBASSADOR.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: BlueAjah
You didn't know that Fusion GPS was hired to produce opposition materials?
Gee, I think most of us knew that ... what, a year, year-and-a-half ago?
Glad you're catching up, LOL.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Gryphon66
It is and has been well-known that the raw intelligence material GATHERED by Chris Steele for Fusion GPS CORROBORATED other information that had been gathered in the investigation including material from the AUSTRAILIAN AMBASSADOR.
If you would be so kind as to site this "well known" fact I would greatly appreciate it.
Last I knew Steele told a court in England the dossier was unverified.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: BlueAjah
I thought Strzok couldn't/wouldn't comment on the Dossier, or should I say, the THREE Dossiers.
Well, that's concerning, isn't it ... if we forget that these people in law enforcment and the court systems work hand in hand with each other all the time ...
“Rudy is on the FISC! Did you know that?” Page said in a text to Strzok in July 2016. “Just appointed two months ago.” “I did,” Strozk said in response. “We talked about it before and after. I need to get together with him.” The two also discussed how Strzok needed to be careful about what he discussed with Contreras to avoid putting him “into a situation where he’d have to recuse himself.”
“We were deeply troubled by text messages sent by Strzok and Page that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations,”
“It is not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even more seriously, implies a willingness to take official action to impact the presidential candidate’s electoral prospects,” the IG said.
"Strzok’s decision to prioritize the Russia investigation over following up on the midyear-related investigative lead discovered on the [Anthony] Weiner laptop in October 2016, these text messages led us to conclude that we did not have confidence that Strzok’s decision was free from bias.”
It was funny how Jim Jordan made him repeat what he said, just to make sure it was obvious that he meant it.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Gryphon66
It is and has been well-known that the raw intelligence material GATHERED by Chris Steele for Fusion GPS CORROBORATED other information that had been gathered in the investigation including material from the AUSTRAILIAN AMBASSADOR.
If you would be so kind as to site this "well known" fact I would greatly appreciate it.
Last I knew Steele told a court in England the dossier was unverified.
Do you understand the value of raw intelligence? If not, I suppose I could Google it for you.
Do you need evidence that the material in the Steele Dossier corroborated other information? I suppose I can fetch that for you as well.
originally posted by: ShamnaOahu
Can we talk about this female sitting behind him??? WTF. I feel like I'm taking crazy pills because no one is seeing this.
Creepy gif that looks (to me) like her controlling Strzok at below link.
twitter.com...