Peter Strzok Testimony Before Congress 07-12-18

originally posted by: six67seven
a reply to: JinMI

that escalated quickly.

Strzok - "I always told the truth"
-- He must not understand what 'truth' means...

Yup. Someone here mentioned a dictionary. I wonder who...

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Jonjonj

It's all they have to work with.

It's pretty dark really.

originally posted by: Jonjonj
The whataboutery is wonderful.

Whataboutism (also known as whataboutery) is a variant of the tu quoque logical fallacy that attempts to discredit an opponent's position by charging them with hypocrisy without directly refuting or disproving their argument,[1][2][3] which is particularly associated with Soviet and Russian propaganda.[4][5][6

en.wikipedia.org...

For a bunch that purports themselves as hating RUSSIA.

They sure love using RUSSIAN propaganda techniques.

I can't say "I don't understand why the dems cannot ask Strzok a relevant question [re: text messages]" ... because I completely understand why they can't... or won't

Their depth of irrelevance in this session is mind-blowing! Do they know no bounds??

originally posted by: underpass61

originally posted by: six67seven
a reply to: JinMI

that escalated quickly.

Strzok - "I always told the truth"
-- He must not understand what 'truth' means...

They should ask him if his wife would agree.

I didn't know strzok was/is married!

Poe!

Telling it like it is.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: underpass61

originally posted by: six67seven
a reply to: JinMI

that escalated quickly.

Strzok - "I always told the truth"
-- He must not understand what 'truth' means...

They should ask him if his wife would agree.

I didn't know strzok was/is married!

Yes, Strzok and Page are both married to others.

50,000 texts, and changing memos not enough EVIDENCE for you?

Strzok is BIASED.

I've been watching on and off all day, actually had some work to do so I've missed a bit of it.


But from what I've been able to ascertain, is. . .


Republican: We want to ask questions about biased investigations.

Strzok: I have a balloon. It's got a string on it.

Democrat: Can I has a balloon too?

a reply to: DBCowboy

Highly accurate.

Deutch snip talking his coworkers, and the FBI is above reproach.

What a #.

This is indeed high theatre. If only both sides were acting instead of only one.

Funny how Strzok suddenly cloaks himself in words aren't important, just actions.

Never mind the left screams about Trump's words everyday as cause for impeachment alone.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
I've been watching on and off all day, actually had some work to do so I've missed a bit of it.


But from what I've been able to ascertain, is. . .


Republican: We want to ask questions about biased investigations.

Strzok: I have a balloon. It's got a string on it.

Democrat: Can I has a balloon too?

On the nose.

originally posted by: neo96
50,000 texts, and changing memos not enough EVIDENCE for you?

Strzok is BIASED.

And you're not?

a reply to: Annee

Neo is an FBI agent investigating presidential candidates?

a reply to: Annee

I can admit it unlike those snip hats on the stream playing mental gymnastics.

Between Lee,Clay,Johnson,Deutch,STRZOK and the rest of those shills that CAN'T.

I'm having to dvr and catch up so I'm a little late but you GOTTA love The Gohmer(t)!!

originally posted by: Zoyd23
Zero respect for congress and the process...this is nothing more than theatrics and all the actors are guilty. Wish I could believe or trust one of these clowns, but if there's one thing I learned from Obama it's that bad guys are running the country.

You didn’t learn that from Bush?! What were you asleep or just very young?

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: neo96
50,000 texts, and changing memos not enough EVIDENCE for you?

Strzok is BIASED.

And you're not?

My guess is Neo will answer he is.... It's a little different when we are honest about being biased... Also it's a little different when you said you are going to stop a political candidate and then are leading an investigation with them.

Again, I'm not saying the investigation is null and void, all I'm saying is Strzok crossed a line.