Peter Strzok Testimony Before Congress 07-12-18

a reply to: JinMI

They've offered NO PROOF.

Just accusation that one would have found at the Salem Witch Trials.

a reply to: neo96

That is not Sheila Jackson. It's Frederica Wilson.i

See you don't even know who is who.

Peachy.

a reply to: Muninn

The guy is cool as a cucumber. Doesn't settle in a zone and counters arguments (no matter the absurdity)

Have they asked Strzok what he meant with the words: "The White House is controlling this."?

He already cracked.

He actually said that he wasn't talking about Trump when he said impeach.


Holy crap

Trump's getting the RED CARPET in England! Dems here in America must be seeing red, lol.

yay, moral superiority too!

Fkin twits.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: neo96

That is not Sheila Jackson. It's Frederica Wilson.i

See you don't even know who is who.

Peachy.

Triggered!!!!

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: neo96

That is not Sheila Jackson. It's Frederica Wilson.i

See you don't even know who is who.

Peachy.

IF you say so

originally posted by: TomLawless
He already cracked.

He actually said that he wasn't talking about Trump when he said impeach.


Holy crap

Well..he could have been talking about Obama. "If we get caught, we'll all hang, including Obama!"

a reply to: neo96

There are people on here who think the earth is hallow or flat and others that think we faked the moonlandings.
If one mistake makes someone a moron we're all morons.
I'm done with this conversation.

Oh...wow.

Mr King gets the implications and then Strzok says he's not being bias!

Hyperbolic anti Trump comments ISN'T BIAS!

LOL.

Denial.

originally posted by: TomLawless
He already cracked.

He actually said that he wasn't talking about Trump when he said impeach.


Holy crap

So, pray tell, who did he say he was talking about?

a reply to: Sillyolme

Might want to take lessons on deflection from Clay.

a reply to: JinMI

Then you need to actually point out any single action he took in acting on his bias.

originally posted by: JinMI
Oh...wow.

Mr King gets the implications and then Strzok says he's not being bias!

Strzok must not understand what 'bias' means.

a reply to: six67seven

That revelation throws me for a loop. Admitting it is one thing. Saying it's not part of your work is another. However denying it in the face of facts is something entirety separate.

a reply to: Agit8dChop

'' I am taking the 5th ''

forgive my ignorance - but i am under the delusion that an interviewee " involkes the 5th amenment right "once - and thats it

can you answer question 1 , 2 , 5 , 8 and 11 - and still invoke 5th amendment rights on Q 3 , 4 , 6 , 7 , 9 , 10 , 12 ?????????

Go. Mr. King!