Peter Strzok Testimony Before Congress 07-12-18

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: introvert

No. I'm addressing the ignorance of your post.

Then why are you asking me questions that had nothing to do with my post?

a reply to: loam

It's funny.

Not a single one has been found guilty in a court of LAW.

a reply to: TheRedneck

No, he said the lawyers looked at the original wording and thought it could be misleading or suggestive of criminal behavior and they advised that since they didn't have a crime they shouldn't use language that may imply that there could be one. It was the advice of the lawyers consulting on the case that the language needed to be changed because they had not found any criminal behavior in order not to suggest there was any.
The change was made by Strzok because the meeting took place in his office.

They couldn't have gone to recess before LEE?

a reply to: introvert

Right, and the outcome will be the same as all the others, both sides believing this is the "Smoking Gun" this is what will change everything, and then nothing until the next one.

It is just amusing how both sides can say they are the ones destroying the other

a reply to: neo96

It’s good they didn’t... In his answers, Stzrok just got called out on talking about an ongoing investigation, and is told he’ll be expected to answer more... It might not change what he will talk about, but it was a clear double standard pointed out.

originally posted by: JinMI
Does anyone really think that it is possible to remove your individual life experiences in their entirety (bias) everyday to do a job while simultaneously using those bias to speak with another co-worker?

I'm genuinely curious.

Not in Strzok's case. That much seems obvious to me.

But in general, I do believe it's possible. Kind of depends on what the/your job is...

originally posted by: XAnarchistX
a reply to: introvert

Right, and the outcome will be the same as all the others, both sides believing this is the "Smoking Gun" this is what will change everything, and then nothing until the next one.

It is just amusing how both sides can say they are the ones destroying the other

I agree. It's just one big circle jerk where the person being questioned tells us what we already know and the representatives put on their best theater for the people at home, but still do not produce any meaningful results from the questioning.

As I said, the one representative obviously used a bait and switch, then deflection, yet no one seemed to notice.

originally posted by: japhrimu
a reply to: neo96

It’s good they didn’t... In his answers, Stzrok just got called out on talking about an ongoing investigation, and is told he’ll be expected to answer more... It might not change what he will talk about, but it was a clear double standard pointed out.

Yep...he opened the can so he can't claim it anymore at this point. Or I guess he can but will definitely be held in contempt.

originally posted by: neo96
They couldn't have gone to recess before LEE?

She is the dedicated appetite suppressant.

originally posted by: Whereismypassword

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: savagediver
This guy said he left all his political beliefs and bias at the door when he got to work , that all FBI agents do. I want to know if there are any of these Trump hating emails that were sent and or received during work hours. If they were sent during work hours this guy is a liar , no two ways about it. You left it at the door on work hours or you didn't.

For the record I wouldn't trust this guy ever , just ask his wife how she feels about his integrity.

I would rather ask Lisa Page's husband about whether or not he thinks the man screwing his wife is a man of integrity.

As a vocal Trump support that’s not a wise thing to say with Dirty Donald’s past history

Are you reaaaaally trying to get Stormy back on topic?

Police: Stormy Daniels' arrest part of long-term human trafficking probe

This Stormy?

Sorry to go off-topic guys. I'm done for now.

a reply to: vinifalou


I thought Stormy was arrested at the strip club last night for indecency? Ohio is Bible Belt country. You can't show too much skin.

originally posted by: neo96
They couldn't have gone to recess before LEE?

Is Sheila Lee Jackson the Congresswoman who wears the Pedophile club ring?

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: vinifalou


I thought Stormy was arrested at the strip club last night for indecency? Ohio is Bible Belt country. You can't show too much skin.

She was. This is a new story about another part of why she was arrested.

If it comes out true that she was involved in a trafficking ring....well let's just say I will be heartily chuckling at those that gave her the key to their city....LOL!

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: neo96
They couldn't have gone to recess before LEE?

Is Sheila Lee Jackson the Congresswoman who wears the Pedophile club ring?

She's the moron that wears the cowboy hats.

a reply to: six67seven

Anyone in sales knows this. You will at some time get a customer who's views are repulsive to you. You cannot let that effect your work and you cant let it effect the customers expectations. It's not impossible. Self control is easy when you practice it as part of your job.

a reply to: Sillyolme

It's not impissible.

Ooops.

Remember Folks.




Lee wasn't interested in truth.

originally posted by: neo96
Strzok still lying.

Left his political beliefs at home eh.

LIE,LIE,LIE.

You realize every single member of every single law enforcement and intelligence agency out there has personal political beliefs. Do you think none of them can keep their political beliefs at home? Or is it just this one?

a reply to: DoubleDNH

In the year 2018.

It's so ingrained in to society they're inseparable.