Peter Strzok Testimony Before Congress 07-12-18

a reply to: Sillyolme

Everybody is entitled to their political opinion.

Everyone except Trump.

Strzok said as much.

a reply to: knoxie

I say release every closed door transcript and the president should declassify everything and release it all...

Strzok truly doesn't inspire confidence.

For an FBI agent he sure can't recall too much.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: neo96

Everybody is entitled to their political opinion. The question isn't whether he liked trump. The question is did his views affect his work and the IG determined that it did not.

Then surely his answers during testimony should match the sentiment found in his texts right?

Because what he says when ( he thinks ) nobody is looking should be equated with his testimony in front of TV cameras...right?

a reply to: SonOfThor

LOL thanks. It's all theater.

Did Strzok just admit that he changed the wording to prevent charges to Hillary?

He testified that the lawyers wanted it changed for that exact reason!

TheRedneck

At least he admitted it was his PC that changed the gross negligence bit. He couldn't recall if he was the one who did it.

Really?

a reply to: TheRedneck

Yep he did.

Also the FBI did the DOJs job.

Like the guy said 4 Pinocchio's.

originally posted by: vinifalou
a reply to: TheRedneck

I guess these people will never assume their mistakes.

It's called sociopathy.

a reply to: Sillyolme

The IG determined that there was no substantial evidence to show a bias, meaning tangible proof.

That is a far cry from him not letting his bias affect his work.

This is a very important distinction during investigations.

If you think Russia stolen the last election, is a 'great' threat.

YOUR BIASED.

They are no more of a threat than they've been for the last 60 years.

a reply to: neo96

Strzok was cointell for years.

OK, guys, I've seen enough... Strzok is twisting things beyond belief, half the committees are protecting him and the other half are not able to get their questions answered for the interruptions.

Old redneck is getting a nap.

TheRedneck

a reply to: SlapMonkey

There is a difference between what might have happened and likely happened and what can be proven. Some people don't understand that.

This lady talking sounds like someone who is far too naive to be in public office.

ETA: Sensenbrenner has a brow ridge that a Neandertal would envy.

a reply to: neo96

So what actions did he take to put his bias into play? Because these texts were private. They weren't published for the consumption of others to sway opinions nor were the opinions spread through the investigation at all so maybe you can explain how these private opinions were used to alter or effect or inhibit what ever action you attribute to them, the campaign or trump. In your own words. lol

THIS

IS

A

JOKE!

a reply to: loam

But we're not FBI agents.

a reply to: Sillyolme

So what actions did he take to put his bias into play?

Here's an example.

I’ve never seen a bigger weasel in my life.

I definitely would of stolen his lunch money.

He really looks like a rodent.