‘Walk Away’ Founder Refused Service at Manhattan Electronics Store

originally posted by: redmage
This is not my post.

OK.
So where did i say what you posted?

a reply to: c2oden

You can't be serious?!?!

Everyone can plainly see that this is your post.

originally posted by: c2oden
You have what you think to be true.
I have what I think to be true.
I think you are on wrong side.

That is it.

It's the 2nd post on page 3, and it's all yours.

originally posted by: redmage
a reply to: c2oden

You said, "I think you are on wrong side".

My side is, "maybe such sarcasm regarding notions of killing should be considered before simply tossing it out there without a care".

Thus, why do you feel there should be more use of careless notions of political killings?

That is you!
Not me.

originally posted by: c2oden

well?

Well what?

You said, "I think you are on wrong side", and now you deny it.

My side was, "maybe such sarcasm regarding notions of killing should be considered before simply tossing it out there without a care", and you said I was on the "wrong side".

You're being absurd.

originally posted by: redmage

originally posted by: c2oden

well?

Well what?

You said, "I think you are on wrong side", and now you deny it.

No.
That is not what we have been talking about.

We are talking about you, misquoting me.

originally posted by: c2oden
We are talking about you, misquoting me.

I didn't misquote you.

You had the nerve to tell me that I said something that you said.

originally posted by: c2oden

originally posted by: redmage

originally posted by: c2oden
Do you think that I broad stroke or do you think that you do?

I think DB sarcastically did with "It shows how tolerant they are by letting him live.", as if some monolithic "they" actually exists, and I think I did sarcastically (yet clearly darker) in my similar reply pointing out that killing has already happened in today's political climate (which is largely fed by using the broad-stroke technique). Thus, maybe such sarcasm regarding notions of killing should be considered before simply tossing it out there without a care.

As for you, I rarely see much from you beyond one to two line quips like...

originally posted by: c2oden
So that is what you have?
What else?

You have what you think to be true.
I have what I think to be true.
I think you are on wrong side.

That is it.

originally posted by: redmage

originally posted by: c2oden
We are talking about you, misquoting me.

I didn't misquote you.

Yeah. you did.

a reply to: c2oden

I'd love to see that, but I think you may simply be delirious, or hallucinating.

Feel free to show me where you're imagining this alleged "misquote".

originally posted by: redmage
a reply to: c2oden

I'd love to see that, but I think you may simply be delirious, or hallucinating.

Feel free to show me where you're imagining this alleged "misquote".

Look above.
You can clearly see that you are wrong.

a reply to: c2oden

Nothing you've provided has shown any misquote.

originally posted by: redmage
a reply to: c2oden

Considering that my main point was, "maybe such sarcasm regarding notions of killing should be considered before simply tossing it out there without a care."... your stance is interesting to say the least.

Why do you feel there should be more use of careless notions of political killings?

originally posted by: redmage

originally posted by: c2oden
The flaw is that people only see it when it suits them.

Perhaps that's why you think, "maybe such sarcasm regarding notions of killing should be considered before simply tossing it out there without a care" is the "wrong side".

You still have shown no misquote.

Guys just move on from your misunderstanding.

originally posted by: redmage

originally posted by: c2oden
The flaw is that people only see it when it suits them.

Perhaps that's why you think, "maybe such sarcasm regarding notions of killing should be considered before simply tossing it out there without a care" is the "wrong side".

Here.

a reply to: testingtesting

I'd love to, but he's on a streak making wild accusations alleging something that simply didn't happen.

a reply to: redmage

Be the bigger man move on or get back to the topic, or just settle it with PM's.

Back to the OP no one should be refused service for their political views.

originally posted by: redmage
a reply to: testingtesting

I'd love to, but he's on a streak making wild accusations alleging something that simply didn't happen.

Read the above post.
What you posted, and attributed it to me.