It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: Xcathdra
Detention facilities. Also can you point out in your post history where you made this exact same argument when Obama and Bush and Bill Clinton were doing the exact same thing?
Elien Gonzalez anyone?
Concentration camps.
Obama wasn't separating families or holding them as long. I've never commented on Bush and Clinton policies so there's no history to quote in either direction, but if you want to bring up Elien Gonzalez, I think Bill Clinton was wrong on that.
originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: pavil
It seems to work great in the US. Moving between states is totally effortless, and no one is harmed by doing so.
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: pavil
You might want to look that up.
Just saying.
I have. Ease of travel, cheap trade, low crime, plenty of work, and good pay.
But there's soccer! (and Auschwitz had an orchestra) Like my daughter says, this is where the frog needs to jump out of the pot!
originally posted by: wheresthebody
Many people have been convinced that being inhumane is an acceptable way to go about their lives. People are sick.
originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: Xcathdra
That's due to far right radicals that had already been citizens in those countries. People who are scared they no longer have a place in the world. It's home grown terrorism, not an invasion.
originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: Xcathdra
That's due to far right radicals that had already been citizens in those countries. People who are scared they no longer have a place in the world. It's home grown terrorism, not an invasion.
originally posted by: pavil
originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: Xcathdra
That's due to far right radicals that had already been citizens in those countries. People who are scared they no longer have a place in the world. It's home grown terrorism, not an invasion.
Just gloss over the Islamic Radical terror attacks. How did those people get into Europe in the first place?
originally posted by: pavil
originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: Xcathdra
That's due to far right radicals that had already been citizens in those countries. People who are scared they no longer have a place in the world. It's home grown terrorism, not an invasion.
Just gloss over the Islamic Radical terror attacks. How did those people get into Europe in the first place?
The change is part of a broad effort by the Obama administration to get a handle on the flood of young immigrants crossing the border. More than 50,000 unaccompanied minors have been caught on the border so far this year, most coming from Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador. The White House is requesting about $2 billion to house the children and move to the border a flock of immigration judges, U.S. attorneys and asylum advocates to counsel some immigrants on their asylum applications.
But immigration attorneys were ourtraged by the notion of changing a law designed to protect unaccompanied minors who may be victims of trafficking and violence.
"It's an utter devastation of due process for our most vulnerable community members," said Ruthie Epstein, a Washington-based policy analyst at the ACLU.
The White House wants all immigration cases – those that end with a deportation or an approval to remain in the country – resolved more quickly. Immigration courts are backlogged around the country, leaving children and adults waiting months or years for their cases to be resolved.
The 2008 law, which passed both chambers of Congress by unanimous consent and was signed into law by President George W. Bush, dictates exactly how children caught crossing the border without their parents must be treated.