Dr. Hal Puthoff Discusses UFO Technology At The SSE/IRVA Conference, Las Vegas, June 8, 2018

Who's Dr. Puthoff? He's vice president and co-founder of Science and Technology at TTS Academy and has over 50 years experience dealing with "electron-beam devices, lasers and space propulsion."

Dr. Puthoff’s professional background spans more than five decades of research at General Electric, Sperry, the National Security Agency, Stanford University and SRI International. Dr. Puthoff regularly advises NASA , the Department of Defense and intelligence communities, corporations and foundations on leading-edge technologies and future technology trends. He earned his Ph.D. from Stanford University in 1967 and won a Who’s Who Lifetime Achievement in 2017

paradigmresearchgroup.org...

Some of the things that Dr. Puthoff discusses in this interesting article are:
...the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), became concerned that objects of unknown origin were flying all over the United States, including the oceans and other parts of the world. This is why the Advanced Aerospace Weapons Systems Application Program was formed.

It began in June of 2007. The Defense Intelligence Agency was concerned about the fact that obvious observation had shown that Advanced Aerospace Vehicles – crafts, or drones of unknown origin, were flying all over the United States, over waters, in fact globally as was the case. So a Congressional budget was approved to address the issue behind the scenes. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid from Nevada was the one who was the initiator of the program, joined by Senator Inouye and Senator Stevens. These are the people who generally approve programs that were in the black, under high security, behind the scenes, and so they set up this program.

...there was concern at the Department of Defense, that our adversaries were going to discover advanced technologies from the study and/or retrieval of materials from crashed Advanced Aerospace Vehicles (AAV) of unknown origin.

What happens if potential adversaries achieve significant breakthroughs by getting hold of advanced technology either based on their study of the phenomena, or from sensor data, or from crash retrieved materials? That could provide a problem for the United States in the sense of threat. There’s reason to be concerned about that. This is a document in the program we dug up out of the Soviet Union (“Thread-3”). It’s a very thick document. It shows that the Soviet Union had a massive program also trying to get to the root of all of this. In this document a number of research institutes and military institutes are listed. Of course, they had the same concerns we did. Is there a threat from the phenomena or might the Americans make headway before us and that be a threat?

...these Advanced Aerospace Vehicles were stealthy and were capable of remaining stationary in the air, before accelerating off at high speeds.

The Advanced Aerospace Vehicle is no-known air vehicle in the inventory of the U.S. or foreign nation as far as we can tell. Low-observable characteristics, they are stealthy. They exhibit advanced aerodynamic performance that we can’t imagine how they do it. Recognize that these are infrared tapes from the pilots, so if there was some kind of hot propulsion gasses coming out the back you would have seen it, but we don’t see that. They had the advanced capability to remain stationary and then take off like a shot. Dave Fravor said it was like somebody had suddenly shot a bullet.

...the DIA chose Bigelow Aerospace to evaluate the potential threats from Advanced Aerospace Vehicles.

Bigelow was actually a good choice. He’d spent a lot of his own money because he was interested in this area up to this point investigating the phenomena, and he had the best proposal. So he was tasked. He set up a special organization called Bigelow Aerospace Advanced Space Studies – we call it BAASS – to do all the things you’d expect a program like this to do.

...there are 38 reports that have been written on programmable matter, invisibility cloaking, antigravity for aerospace applications, negative mass propulsion, dark energy, warp drive, other dimensions, IEC fusion used as a compact energy source and other advanced technologies. These documents are classified, but a few have leaked out to the public.

we told these people they could publish their reports in physics journals and engineering journals, but of course the contractors didn’t want to wait for that, so the Defense Intelligence Agency bundled up these 38 papers and put them out as Defense Intelligence Reference Documents posted on a JWICS server that anyone in the government or contractors could get access to. By and large they have not been released to the public yet; a couple of them leaked out.

...There are exotic, "metamaterials" being developed for aerospace use, that are classified, but a few have been leaked to the public. A crash retrieval sample was sent to the late Art Bell, from a guy who claimed he was from the military. This "metamaterial" was a multilayered bismuth and magnesium sample, that wasn't made by any known lab and couldn't be reproduced by any lab. Years later, it was discovered that this metamaterial would "propagate sub-wavelength waveguide effects," but no one knows the purpose of this function.

it’s amazing we’ve gone through this and this is the kind of structure we go through a lot. You get a material sample with unusual characteristics to be evaluated, the method of manufacture is difficult to assess or reproduce, the purpose of the function is not readily apparent – as with our sample here, and then as our own technical knowledge moves forward we finally see a possible purpose or function comes to light. That sequence is repeated over and over in this particular area.

...Dr. Puthoff discusses spacetime metric engineering and how Advanced Aerospace Vehicles exhibit physics "that we know and love even if we can't reproduce it."

I’ll pick a second one here for the engineers or physicists in the crowd. Probably be more interesting – spacetime metric engineering. This happens to be the paper that I myself provided. One of the questions is: can the reported anomalous observables of these Advanced Aerospace Vehicles be accounted for on the basis of known physics? You hear people describing craft taking right angle turns at high speeds, other things with the hovering and rapid acceleration and so on, as if the craft didn’t have any inertial mass. Well, it turns out although Einstein’s general relativity is usually used in astrophysical applications and gravity studies and so on, you can look at it from an engineering standpoint. So, if you take an engineering approach to general relativity, what I just showed can be understood. If you could change the spacetime metric the way general relativity – I’m talking about textbook, not some fanciful physics – you could even get faster-than-light travel. Alcubierre warp drive as in Star Trek. Again, you might think that’s a fanciful kind of thing, but that paper was published in one of the top general relativity journals, Miguel Alcubierre, “The Warp Drive: Hyper-Fast Travel within General Relativity,” Classical and Quantum Gravity (11:L73-L77,1994). So, if you engineer spacetime metric, you can begin to line up observables with physics that we know and love even if we can’t reproduce it.

a reply to: shawmanfromny

...a paper discussing how exotic physics can be addressed using metric engineering, was published in a British interplanetary science journal, which was also published as one of the Defense Intelligence Agency’s reference documents.

That helped us understand some of the aspects, I mean you may have heard the phrase, “dense stars you get red-shift.” It turns out in this engineered technology you get so called “blue shift.” That is, frequencies are up-shifted to higher frequencies. So, for example in this room most of the radiation coming off our bodies, off the walls and so on is in fact in the infrared. But we see things in the visible range. What happens when you get into a volume of space where the vacuum has been engineered in the way I’ve been discussing? It turns out you get a blue shift. So, in fact the infrared that you don’t ordinarily see can get blue shifted up into the visible so it’s not surprising that all these craft should be so luminous. Now the downside from all of this is the fact that visible light, which doesn’t have any particularly harmful effects, gets blue shifted up into the ultraviolet, so if you get too close to a landed craft, you might get a sunburn, or off into the soft X-ray regions so there’s a chance of radiation poisoning. If you run across one of these sitting on the ground and it’s powered up, I recommend you don’t rush up.

...To the Stars Academy of Arts and Science was established to provide the public sector with information regarding Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon.

We all banded together to form this academy. It was set up as a public benefit corporation so the public can invest and therefore it’s owned by the public. So this is something new. Whatever comes out of any of the research or any of the releases of information is actually going to be owned by the public. It is not going to disappear into a black hole. A very transparent structure, if you go to the website you can see everything from the financial structure to the activities, and we do have a web-based community-of-interest where things get posted. For example, the F-18 FLIR tape I showed, we now have three of them up there and probably more to come.

So, we want to act as the glue in the public sector and create entertainment properties, books and documentaries and so on so whatever is learned can be delivered out to the public. The structure of the organization has a science structure, an aerospace structure, and an entertainment division.

ALL HIGHLIGHTED CONTENT CAN BE FOUND AT THIS LINK:
paradigmresearchgroup.org...

a reply to: shawmanfromny

S&f ill have to digest and get back to you. I appreciate you bringing it here.

This is interesting. I'll have to come back to this to get a better picture of everything they're saying.

However, one thing that struck me as unusual was the idea of looking at these challenges as engineering problems. Engineers base their inventions on science. The scientists have to define the principles and operations first. Then the engineers take those ideas and spin them into concrete creations.

-dex

I was just pondering the idea of negative mass the other day. Assuming it's not just a flaw in the mathematics, I can see it having some interesting properties.

a reply to: Blue Shift

Blueshift,

#1 Do you play DN with Dakine
#2 Would you consider anti-matter a form of negative mass?
#3 Have you ever considered the possibility that we induce negative mass on electrons, when we "float" a magnet over a super conductor?

Although once you start talking negative mass, you could just be implying vacuum. That's more like a mass potential difference. Interesting.

originally posted by: Archivalist
#1 Do you play DN with Dakine

Nope.

#2 Would you consider anti-matter a form of negative mass?

No. It's hard to describe, but I'm visualizing it as mass that expresses itself "inward," rather than "outward," and doesn't carry a charge we would recognize as such. Not anti-matter.

#3 Have you ever considered the possibility that we induce negative mass on electrons, when we "float" a magnet over a super conductor?

More like we're temporarily, partially isolating it from the fields generated by positive mass.

Although once you start talking negative mass, you could just be implying vacuum. That's more like a mass potential difference. Interesting.

Not vacuum. And not "virtual." These aren't potentialities, but real things that are just not able to be directly detected. Mass correlating to what the math presents as a negative number. Like I said, assuming the math is correct.

Dr Hal Putoff is a fellow of this very website. Just saying. On top of everthing else he styled the availability of the 1000 ways to create honesty... In all honesty, read Dave Mcgowan. Just Missing. I mean kissing.

I keep waiting for the rumored NASA spaceflight observations, anybody have more specifics?

a reply to: JimOberg

No idea Jim, but this is a cool development: