Solidarity with Tommy Robinson.

Great.

More fact-free guff about Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon (also previously known as Andrew McMaster and Paul Harris) from non-Brits who don't understand British law.

Just what we need.



Rat

a reply to: paraphi

Well, there we have it, you can't live-stream on a public street in the UK.

As in the old USSR states - that is a political crime.

And that's the thing about this case.
According to the precedent, that could be you (or anyone with phone cameras) tomorrow.

The difference being they don't care about you for now, but the system cared about Tommy (maybe Mossad - doesn't matter in principle), because he spoke very well.

I know he was a soldier, just a feeling, I could tell.
And if you speak too much you get 13 months in hell.

What you fail to understand or ignore is the fact Tommy admitted it in court and apologised. He was on probation. One breach of probation and you're back inside lickety spit which is what happened. He knows he is watched regularly by the Police. He's not stupid and knew exactly what he was doing and as a result got a ton of publicity for his "cause".

a reply to: PhyllidaDavenport

Got footage of that?

I mean in-court footage?
Exactly what was said?

Probably not. Why? Because I recall almost for a week nobody was even allowed discuss Tommy's case.

You could go to prison in the UK, just for mentioning it.

Thanks bro, but you sure that's what he was accused and sentenced for?
I mean, let's compare apples to apples.

Should international journalism groups take note - yeah, for sure.

I suppose it puts the UK on the top of the rubbish pile concerning free speech, along with some of their former colonies.

Like Zimbabwe, for example.

And not saying that to be nasty, but when society goes into total censorship and fascism - flip people, we have a problem.

a reply to: halfoldman

Believe me.....thats happening. No coverage here in the US whatsoever.

originally posted by: halfoldman
Well, there we have it, you can't live-stream on a public street in the UK.

You can. You can even live-stream from a tree if you wanted to, or from a nudist beach.

What you cannot do is live-stream from inside the boundaries of a court of law when the court officials ask you not to due to the risk of compromising a trial, and where there is signage asking you not to do so.

No disrespect, but you really need to research the subject rather than believing everything you watch on YouTube.

Ignorance is bliss, eh?

a reply to: paraphi

No evidence till yet there was a sign or a warning.
He was filming on a public street.
Last I checked that was still legal outside North Korea.

a reply to: paraphi

No evidence till yet there was a sign or a warning.
He was filming on a public street.
Last I checked that was still legal outside North Korea.

a reply to: paraphi

No evidence till yet there was a sign or a warning.
He was filming on a public street.
Last I checked that was still legal outside North Korea.

Or not?
That's the concern.
You clearly argue it is not, or it shouldn't be.
But in the same breath you must then admit that you support state censorship.
It's groovy, just be clear about it.

a reply to: halfoldman

Like I said. Do some proper research. This ain't a free speech issue.

a reply to: paraphi

It is very selective this law you speak about. When Tommy Robinson speaks into a mobile phone in front of the court it's against the law, but when oodles of photographers and camera people film for other cases, they can be seen standing as close as the steps of the court [which is much closer than he was], pestering the families of those accused.
Serious question following: Are 'official journalists' allowed to harass, pester, photograph and film those involved in a court case but TR who is an 'independent journalist' [who they don't like] this is suddenly a crime?

Tommy Robinson free!

Tommy going back to jail?

Hey, Tommy Tommy ...

The people are many, and they will never forget this injustice!

Me threatening nobody, but we all know ...

You made the national #-list.

That must be obvious.

So when you sentence this innocent man - sleep tight sweeties.

The mainstream media - you're not journalists.

You are left-wing Stalinist activists pretending you're newsworthy.

You went "woke", and your media is going "broke".

Without fail, you check BBC/CNN/Sky story and the commentary means the narrative is totally the opposite of how people feel.

A totally innocent man heading for prison.
It should be a case for Amnesty International ...

But no, you have forgotten the people.

You are defending a Globalist dictatorship.

Hey Tommy - you support him, you must be "far-right".

So they shall spin it, not press freedom has been strangled in the UK.
Very concerning - you're a banana republic!

But no, just label any critics "far right".

Forget the labels, I say justice for Tommy!

And I witnessed part of the liberation struggle in South Africa.

Martyrs are necessary.

Only for a short time.

Where the sergeant leads, the men shall follow.

You're never alone, or without support.
Hey, Tommy, Tommy ...

Their regiment - maybe they got one thousand.
Partially loyal.

The army behind Tommy - we got thousands and thousands.

The state wants to see a clash (of course they do).

I tell you now who has the shortest straw.
And it ain't Tommy.

Merkel will hang for treason, and so will this judge.
Time will tell.

But with you Tommy!