Trump says he is likely to support ending federal ban on marijuana

hahaha hahaha cough cough hahaha hahaha hahaha

President Trump said he likely will support a congressional effort to end the federal ban on marijuana, a major step that would reshape the pot industry and end the threat of a Justice Departmentcrackdown.

Trump’s remarks put him sharply at odds with Atty. Gen. Jeff Sessions on the issue. The bill in question, pushed by a bipartisan coalition, would allow states to go forward with legalization unencumbered by threats of federal prosecution.

I'm not sure what kind of 420 dimensional chess Trump is playing here but I'm pretty sure he's winning.
He has sessions running Hardline psyops misdirection when he drops this green bomb on a weekend.
Brilliant.
Libs are probably going to be so confused they won't know whether to let their heads explode or light one up and chill out.

Stay tuned.
Trust sessions?
Enjoy the show!

Holy crap, if Trump does this I will give him YUGE props for it. It will be one of the best decisions a president has made in a long time. I won't get my hopes up though, the for profit prison industry has deep pockets.

a reply to: dashen

BOOM!

It's hilarious.

The TDS folks can't decide whether to #$%& or wind their watch, hehe.

Trust the plan.

Good, never could understand why one would be sent to jail/prison for smoking weed, yet a drunk driver kills someone and gets off the hook with little or no time in prison. (at least that is how it was 50 years ago)

a reply to: MteWamp

The TDS potheads?

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
Holy crap, if Trump does this I will give him YUGE props for it. It will be one of the best decisions a president has made in a long time. I won't get my hopes up though, the for profit prison industry has deep pockets.

In all honesty, though, the wind has been blowing in this direction for a good while now, and the momentum is pretty difficult to stop at this point.

It's pretty much a win-win situation for the administration at this point, don't you think?

I really can't think of any substantial negative repercussions for the President if he supports it.

a reply to: dashen

He has sessions running Hardline psyops misdirection when he drops this green bomb on a weekend.

Truth is they just don't communicate well or trump just doesn't care what anyone wants he is going to do what he wants.



If trump becomes the president that federally legalized marijuana it's going to be a lot harder to beat him in 2020.

Sessions is the poster child for the reefer madness nonsense, but he is right that he can't (shouldn't) pick and choose which laws to follow. He has stated before that it is a legislative issue, and he is right.

Believe me, I am no JS apologist. I think he is a bumbling incompetent.

a reply to: MteWamp

Negative repercussions is law enforcement across the country and the DEA are going to be plenty pissed.

originally posted by: RowanBean
a reply to: MteWamp

The TDS potheads?

Ummm. I have no idea what point you are trying to make.

Trumps cheese is off the cracker. He doesn't even know what he's talking about anymore. The Conservative Christians would never let Trump legalize MJ. The CC are a yuggge part of his constituency and he needs their support.

He said he would pardon Muhammad Ali but Ali was pardoned back in 1971. Dementia... and has to repeat everything 3 times.


4D chess....

originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: MteWamp

Negative repercussions is law enforcement across the country and the DEA are going to be plenty pissed.

Some will be, I'm sure, but you would probably be surprised by how many would support it, at least the ones I've talked to.

I would think that the biggest resistance would be the Big Pharma lobby.

originally posted by: MteWamp

originally posted by: RowanBean
a reply to: MteWamp

The TDS potheads?

Ummm. I have no idea what point you are trying to make.

You said this:

The TDS folks can't decide whether to #$%& or wind their watch, hehe.

Does that include the TDS potheads? I would think they would be very happy with this.

originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: MteWamp

Negative repercussions is law enforcement across the country and the DEA are going to be plenty pissed.

I think you may be wrong. Most LEOs I have been around know that fighting mj is a waste of resources that could be better used elsewhere.

I've been waiting for a reason to use this....



Thank you DJ Trump!

Exactly what I sad yesterday in the sessions is Trump thread.
" NO he's the anti-weed devil, he hired a guy with that opinion!"

He is a businessman.

It's almost as good as business as not creating criminals out of everyone.

Good direction to go for everyone, and there is nothing wrong with maintaining the same protections for minors as alcohol, by still busting people(within reason) for distributing for minors.

The adults don't need a nanny.

Positions like pilots, surgeons, heavy equipment operators can still be tested like any other substance to keep the public safe.

Good move away from the prison plant direction we have been going.

MAGA(cringed)

originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: MteWamp

Negative repercussions is law enforcement across the country and the DEA are going to be plenty pissed.

Well, the DEA's dance with Mary Jane is their bread and butter. Watch them squirm

Sure, they finally do it....after they made so many cartel members rich. Most of the cannabis grown when I was younger came from other countries, getting here through some very powerful and bad people. I suppose they will now give control to some other bad people, big Pharma.

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
Holy crap, if Trump does this I will give him YUGE props for it. It will be one of the best decisions a president has made in a long time. I won't get my hopes up though, the for profit prison industry has deep pockets.

F£¥$/ng finally....

originally posted by: RowanBean

originally posted by: MteWamp

originally posted by: RowanBean
a reply to: MteWamp

The TDS potheads?

Ummm. I have no idea what point you are trying to make.

You said this:

The TDS folks can't decide whether to #$%& or wind their watch, hehe.

Does that include the TDS potheads? I would think they would be very happy with this.

No, no. My only point was that the President can be unpredictable. There are more than enough of us that support legalization AND the President.