It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SonofaSkunk
I bet the gay community is really butthurt about this,,,,,,,,,oh wait...
originally posted by: SonofaSkunk
I bet the gay community is really butthurt about this,,,,,,,,,oh wait...
originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: Annee
It wasn't about the cake.
MASTERPIECE CAKESHOP, LTD., ET AL. v.
COLORADO CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION ET AL.
It was about the fact that the Civil Rights Commission trampled on the first amendment rights of an individual to satisfy an unjust demand for labor.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: Annee
It's not a government owned business.
It affects every citizen.
Now government mandated.
For me it's still about separation of church and state.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: lakenheath24
Good. And if a muslim baker doesnt want to make a jeezus cake then thats ok too. This was a pub stunt in the 1st place and just wastes court time and money....plus needlessly ruins a persons life. a reply to: howtonhawky
The cake was a genetic cake from their catalog.
This decision is so wrong.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: SonofaSkunk
I bet the gay community is really butthurt about this,,,,,,,,,oh wait...
I'd say those for separation of church and state.
This decision is wrong.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: Annee
It wasn't about the cake.
MASTERPIECE CAKESHOP, LTD., ET AL. v.
COLORADO CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION ET AL.
It was about the fact that the Civil Rights Commission trampled on the first amendment rights of an individual to satisfy an unjust demand for labor.
Have you followed this case from Day 1?
I have.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: Annee
It wasn't about the cake.
MASTERPIECE CAKESHOP, LTD., ET AL. v.
COLORADO CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION ET AL.
It was about the fact that the Civil Rights Commission trampled on the first amendment rights of an individual to satisfy an unjust demand for labor.
Have you followed this case from Day 1?
I have.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: Annee
It's not a government owned business.
It affects every citizen.
Now government mandated.
For me it's still about separation of church and state.
originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: Annee
It wasn't about the cake.
MASTERPIECE CAKESHOP, LTD., ET AL. v.
COLORADO CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION ET AL.
It was about the fact that the Civil Rights Commission trampled on the first amendment rights of an individual to satisfy an unjust demand for labor.
For me it's still about separation of church and state.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: Annee
It wasn't about the cake.
MASTERPIECE CAKESHOP, LTD., ET AL. v.
COLORADO CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION ET AL.
It was about the fact that the Civil Rights Commission trampled on the first amendment rights of an individual to satisfy an unjust demand for labor.
Right. SCOTUS didn't rule that Colorado's law against discrimination of gay people trampled anyone's religious rights. The law still stands.
originally posted by: howtonhawky
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: Annee
It wasn't about the cake.
MASTERPIECE CAKESHOP, LTD., ET AL. v.
COLORADO CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION ET AL.
It was about the fact that the Civil Rights Commission trampled on the first amendment rights of an individual to satisfy an unjust demand for labor.
Right. SCOTUS didn't rule that Colorado's law against discrimination of gay people trampled anyone's religious rights. The law still stands.
The law stands but now it has bounderies