Evidence Mounting that Barack Obama and Valerie Jarrett Worked to Keep SPYGATE Hidden.

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: whywhynot

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: whywhynot

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: whywhynot
a reply to: soberbacchus

Spy gate is real and when the matter is totally proven you will still deny it.

LOL

You are hilarious.

In less than 24 hours, Trump’s allegations were publicly refuted by

House Oversight Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), one of just nine lawmakers briefed on highly classified details of the FBI’s operation;

Fox News legal analyst Andrew Napolitano, a Trump favorite;

and prominent legal scholar Alan Dershowitz, a vocal Trump ally who has advised the president on legal strategy.

www.politico.com...

Trump's 'spygate' campaign has had a really rough week

President Trump's most-cited cable news network has been a primary platform for echoing and expounding on his argument that the FBI spied on his campaign for political reasons — he dubbed it "spygate"

— but starting Tuesday afternoon, Fox News has led the way in undermining Trump's conspiracy. First, news anchor Shepard Smith dismantled Trump's claims,

theweek.com...

Please, cling to that desperate crap though.

Oh my gosh now you are quoting Fox, how funny. Any other time they would be fake news but when you like them, well then suddenly quote worthy.

Just pointing out that your Spygate nonsense is so laughable that even Fox News couldn't bring themselves to sell it.

Ha ha ha. Fox News is as fake as the rest of the media. As usual your point is pointless.

Doesn't it bother you that Trump based his erratic policies on "fake" Fox news?

I prefer Russians !!

😃🚬

That's always been obvious.

a reply to: whywhynot

Ok, you allege that President Trump based his erratic policies on Fox News. Firstly a point of clarification, only the erratic policies? Not then the deliberate or thoughtful policies?

He has yet to have a deliberate or thoughtful policy. A tax cut that creates an even bigger deficit? Tariffs on our allies? Allowing polluters to pollute even more? Sitting down at the table with a tyrant? Calling Nazis "decent people?" The only consistent policies he has are hatred of brown people and undoing Obama's legacy.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: carewemust
Most people (incorrectly) assume that SPYGATE is in reference only to the MOLE/SPY/INFORMANT attempting to penetrate the Trump campaign. That is just 1 aspect of SPYGATE.

There are actually 5 (FIVE) ways the Obama Administration SPIED on the Trump campagin, and on President-elect Trump, and his transition team.

1. National Security Letters

2. FISA Warrant

3. Unmasking

4. Undercover Mole/Spy/Informant

5. Foreign Intelligence Agencies Assisting

For a complete description of each, go to: www.theepochtimes.com...

Nice summary
None of the above will survive scrutiny
Obama trashed his legacy

Exactly. One would have to be really dull between the ears, to think that the Obama Admin wasn't spying on the Trump camp.

Additional info was learned yesterday, when more FBI intra-agency communications were made public.

More Text Messages Smoking Guns: thepoliticalinsider.com...

Example from above link:

They voiced alarm when an FBI colleague — “Liz” — suggested the Obama White House was about to hijack the investigation. “Went well, best we could have expected,” Strzok texted Page after an Aug. 5, 2016, meeting. “Other than Liz quote ‘the White House is running this.’ ”

Also, Several Countries Helped Obama Spy on Team Trump: saraacarter.com...

It appears brennan had a lot to do with this....it also appears this started MUCH earlier than we were told.
When the facts are revealed this will make Watergate look like a kiddie tea party in comparison.

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: whywhynot

Ok, you allege that President Trump based his erratic policies on Fox News. Firstly a point of clarification, only the erratic policies? Not then the deliberate or thoughtful policies?

He has yet to have a deliberate or thoughtful policy. A tax cut that creates an even bigger deficit? Tariffs on our allies? Allowing polluters to pollute even more? Sitting down at the table with a tyrant? Calling Nazis "decent people?" The only consistent policies he has are hatred of brown people and undoing Obama's legacy.

You are not really good at this are you?

So no link, no proof means that you are just expressing your opinion at best, ranting at worse.

Emotional response such as yours will never admit to themselves any positive result of Trump. So why enter a no win argument?

If a president you “liked” produced the lowest unemployment in nearly 20 years and was on the road to stop the Korean War you would be singing praises. But you don’t like the results of the last election so you throw your fit. Deny it if you must but you know it’s true. Trump could find the cure for cancer and you would complain the he threw doctors out of work.

Easily seen through.

This statement from Valerie Jarrett in 2012, could be why the Trump campaign, and family, were targeted by Obama's Whitehouse, long before the FBI counter-intelligence FISA spy warrant was obtained. Didn't Obama verbally hit Trump pretty hard at some "roasting" dinner after 2012?

“After we win this election, it’s our turn. Payback time. Everyone not with us is against us and they better be ready because we don’t forget.

The ones who helped us will be rewarded, the ones who opposed us will get what they deserve.

There is going to be hell to pay.

Congress won’t be a problem for us this time. No election to worry about after this is over and we have two judges ready to go.”

Source-A: From 2012: leatherneckm31.wordpress.com...

Source-B: twitter.com...

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: whywhynot

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: whywhynot

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: whywhynot
a reply to: soberbacchus

Spy gate is real and when the matter is totally proven you will still deny it.

LOL

You are hilarious.

In less than 24 hours, Trump’s allegations were publicly refuted by

House Oversight Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), one of just nine lawmakers briefed on highly classified details of the FBI’s operation;

Fox News legal analyst Andrew Napolitano, a Trump favorite;

and prominent legal scholar Alan Dershowitz, a vocal Trump ally who has advised the president on legal strategy.

www.politico.com...

Trump's 'spygate' campaign has had a really rough week

President Trump's most-cited cable news network has been a primary platform for echoing and expounding on his argument that the FBI spied on his campaign for political reasons — he dubbed it "spygate"

— but starting Tuesday afternoon, Fox News has led the way in undermining Trump's conspiracy. First, news anchor Shepard Smith dismantled Trump's claims,

theweek.com...

Please, cling to that desperate crap though.

Oh my gosh now you are quoting Fox, how funny. Any other time they would be fake news but when you like them, well then suddenly quote worthy.

Just pointing out that your Spygate nonsense is so laughable that even Fox News couldn't bring themselves to sell it.

Ha ha ha. Fox News is as fake as the rest of the media. As usual your point is pointless.

Doesn't it bother you that Trump based his erratic policies on "fake" Fox news?

I prefer Russians !!

That's always been obvious.

You need to further "Izvestia-gate"

😎🔓😃

a reply to: carewemust

She had the right idea but with the wrong names.

🔓🔑👋🤦‍♀️

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: carewemust

She had the right idea but with the wrong names.

🔓🔑👋🤦‍♀️

June 24, 2018

FINALLY...Congress is getting closer to the heart of these "matters". Rosenstein is (hopefully) coughing up the unredacted documents, after MONTHS of keeping them hidden.

The Justice Department says it has given House Republicans new classified information related to the Russia investigation after lawmakers had threatened to hold officials in contempt of Congress or even impeach them.

A spokeswoman for House Speaker Paul Ryan said Saturday the department has partially complied with subpoenas from the House Intelligence and Judiciary committees after officials turned over more than a thousand new documents this week.

House Republicans had given the Justice Department and FBI a Friday deadline for all documents, most of which are related to the origins of the FBI’s Russia investigation and the handling of its probe into Democrat Hillary Clinton’s emails.

Ryan spokeswoman AshLee Strong said the department asked for more time and they will get it — for now.

SOURCE: nypost.com...

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: carewemust

It looks like Obama's Spygate scandal really is going to dwarf Watergate, doesn't it?

No.

Not even close.

Stop reading propaganda sources and wait till all of the real information comes out.

ATS would have 80% fewer posts if everyone waited until your definition of "real information" was available.

ATS political forums would be better for it, too. Sadly those in power here dont seems to care as long as things appear civil.

a reply to: carewemust

Well that settles that issue. Looks like Ryan really is trying to protect the "family" from being found out.

a reply to: whywhynot

So no link, no proof means that you are just expressing your opinion at best, ranting at worse.

So now facts have become opinions and rants? Do you need a point by point?

A tax cut that creates an even bigger deficit?

A business publication explains.

Tariffs on our allies?

(Genuine conservative source.)

Allowing polluters to pollute even more?

Not the American Luegenpresse.

Sitting down at the table with a tyrant?

Yes, literally sitting down at a table with a tyrant:

Calling Nazis "decent people?"

Sorry, but facts are still facts.