More Never Trumpers waking up to the Russia collusion farce, when will you?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
So far no evidence has been produced?

That's the funniest thingies ever read.

Cool!

Lets see the evidnece you have that trump or his team colluded with russia to influence the elecetion.

Oh thats right, you have none.

You have evince that some russian caterers posted anti hillary facebook posts including support for black lives matter and LGBT rights.

You have evidence that papadopoulos and flynn lied; neither have had evidnce presented that they colluded with russians.

You have evidence that manafort worked with the podesta group in 2012 to spread pro russian influence trhough people like hillary; manafort was charged, the hillary supporting podesta group was not.

So please, lets see this super secret evidence you have proving trump russian collusion.

When will the left acknowledge the real collusion happening right in their own backyard?

(Psst, which by the way has been 100x more powerful and effective than any Russian collusion.. or Russian meddling.. or Russian bots.. or whatever the hell it is now)

Hillary and Obama colluded with the media to sway an election.


And no one says a word.

a reply to: Grambler

nothing left but an empty bottle and some spit on the screen.

originally posted by: knowledgehunter0986
When will the left acknowledge the real collusion happening right in their own backyard?

(Psst, which by the way has been 100x more powerful and effective than any Russian collusion.. or Russian meddling.. or Russian bots.. or whatever the hell it is now)

Yes as I have said from the begining, if Obamas intel agencies were acting in a corrupt manner aginst trump (which seems very likely at this point) that is far more serious than anything a ofreign country could have done.

But even if we just focus on foreign countries, it seems obvious at this point that theUK had far more influence than Russia (through steele, and the GCHQ collaborating with trump hating brennan)

And then we know that the government of the Ukrain was actively working with people in the hullary camp to spread dirt on Trump. This is not a theory like trump russian collusion, but has actually been confirmed by the person in hillarys camp and by the Ukranian government.

Yet all of that is ok for the trump haters.

a reply to: Grambler

Don't forget they paid some Russians to report/fabricate stories about Trump and Russian whores. Carter Page once talked to some Russians (and was an informant for the FBI re:Russia). Oh, and the intelligence community sent people unsolicitedly to the Trump campaign saying things like, "you know the Russians hacked the emails, right?"


I think maybe Trump should go full Hoover/Lynch. Just send people out there with seedy connections and say things like, "you know Epstein has an island where bad things happen right" to his political foes. Then just use the evidence that the conversations happened ("Hillary and Bill had conversations with informants about Epstein having bad things happening on his island! ") to start a special counsel investigation.

a reply to: face23785

Your source is an obvious piece of propaganda and is based on one giant assumption.

The answer is rather simple, really.

...But, but Trump bad!

...But, but Russia bad!

Just don't ask them anything beyond that or you'll probably get something like...

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: face23785

Your source is an obvious piece of propaganda and is based on one giant assumption.

Which assumption is that?

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: face23785

Your source is an obvious piece of propaganda and is based on one giant assumption.

Which assumption is that?

The assumption that the Left, the media, etc, has fallen back on specific responses because of the "revelation" the Trump campaign has been spied on.

That assumes to know the intent behind their actions and assumes their actions are based on those new "revelations", which are not revelations. They are, in fact, conspiracy theories itself.

The source itself seems to rely on unfounded conspiracy and assumptions.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: face23785

If you say so. I don't believe you, but ok.

I'm sorry, I must have missed the part where you became the arbiter of truth.

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: face23785

Your source is an obvious piece of propaganda and is based on one giant assumption.

Which assumption is that?

The assumption that the Left, the media, etc, has fallen back on specific responses because of the "revelation" the Trump campaign has been spied on.

That assumes to know the intent behind their actions and assumes their actions are based on those new "revelations", which are not revelations. They are, in fact, conspiracy theories itself.

The source itself seems to rely on unfounded conspiracy and assumptions.

Crossfire Hurricane and the admission of an "informant (see spy)" in the Trump campaign are not conspiracy theories or assumption.

What world do you live on?

a reply to: Byrd

That's the group most people are in.
The people not in comas.

a reply to: Grambler

Let's see yours first.
Yeah this whole year hasn't produced anything.
Ha ha ha
Look you choose to ignore the whole thing isn't my problem but you're sure ignoring an awful lot bubba.

a reply to: DBCowboy

Bull#

a reply to: Sillyolme

Prove innocence? That's not how it works.


Turn the tv off.....bubba-ette.

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: face23785

Your source is an obvious piece of propaganda and is based on one giant assumption.

Which assumption is that?

The assumption that the Left, the media, etc, has fallen back on specific responses because of the "revelation" the Trump campaign has been spied on.

That assumes to know the intent behind their actions and assumes their actions are based on those new "revelations", which are not revelations. They are, in fact, conspiracy theories itself.

The source itself seems to rely on unfounded conspiracy and assumptions.

Crossfire Hurricane and the admission of an "informant (see spy)" in the Trump campaign are not conspiracy theories or assumption.

What world do you live on?

I live in this world and informant is not the same as a spy.

Can you provide some evidence that proves the Left's intent here?

I'm open to whatever can be proven, and so far it seems that you guys are talking out of your asses.

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: face23785

Your source is an obvious piece of propaganda and is based on one giant assumption.

Which assumption is that?

The assumption that the Left, the media, etc, has fallen back on specific responses because of the "revelation" the Trump campaign has been spied on.

That assumes to know the intent behind their actions and assumes their actions are based on those new "revelations", which are not revelations. They are, in fact, conspiracy theories itself.

The source itself seems to rely on unfounded conspiracy and assumptions.

Hahahahahaha!!!!

The INTENT master strikes again!!

This coming from you, who has consistently changed the justifications for why there should be an investigation.

Remember, you originally thought trumps teams connections to russians were enough to strat this investigation, yet changed that stance when shown hillarys teams connections to russians, and didnt feel there should be an investigation into her.

The same person who said only right wing nut jobs would want an investigation into the investigators.

And already we have seen the IG investigation into those investigators recommend criminal referrals against McCabe.

Every post you make on this is pure gold!

Please keep going, so that we may learn more of your INTENT!

a reply to: introvert

Strzok's texts with Page seem to indicate something funky with regards to intent.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler

Let's see yours first.
Yeah this whole year hasn't produced anything.
Ha ha ha
Look you choose to ignore the whole thing isn't my problem but you're sure ignoring an awful lot bubba.

In other words you have no evidnece as we all know.

You want to see my evidnece of what, that trump didnt collude with russia?

Hahahahaha!

Keep it up guys, you are really brightening my day!