It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Contempt of court is a criminal offence that can see people jailed for speeches or publications that create a "substantial risk that the course of justice in the proceedings in question will be seriously impeded or prejudiced".
Contempt of Court Act 1981
1981 CHAPTER 49
...
Strict liability
1 The strict liability rule.
In this Act “the strict liability rule” means the rule of law whereby conduct may be treated as a contempt of court as tending to interfere with the course of justice in particular legal proceedings regardless of intent to do so.
2 Limitation of scope of strict liability.
(1)The strict liability rule applies only in relation to publications, and for this purpose “publication” includes any speech, writing, [F1programme included in a cable programme service] or other communication in whatever form, which is addressed to the public at large or any section of the public.
(2)The strict liability rule applies only to a publication which creates a substantial risk that the course of justice in the proceedings in question will be seriously impeded or prejudiced.
(3)The strict liability rule applies to a publication only if the proceedings in question are active within the meaning of this section at the time of the publication.
(4)Schedule 1 applies for determining the times at which proceedings are to be treated as active within the meaning of this section.
With 309,685 members generating 19,258,665 posts of substance (minimal contributions are not allowed) that cover 1,054,473 topics in 170 different discussion forums, you could say "the truth is in here."
originally posted by: DieGloke
He was picked up not necessarily because what he said but rather because he indicated that he was going to go into the courtroom itself, any disruption within the courtroom could cause a mistrial.
Unlike the USA, the UK takes it's right to a fair trial seriously.
If he is such a darling in the USA maybe you should grant him USA citizenship and take him for yourself's?
originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: DieGloke
So he was arrested, charged and sentenced in like 4 hours over something he might do... not something he did?
If that's the truth I am astonished... and a little horrified.
originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: DieGloke
So he was arrested, charged and sentenced in like 4 hours over something he might do... not something he did?
If that's the truth I am astonished... and a little horrified.
originally posted by: seeker1963
originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: DieGloke
So he was arrested, charged and sentenced in like 4 hours over something he might do... not something he did?
If that's the truth I am astonished... and a little horrified.
Yea, that's the disturbing thing about this. These people who believe Nazi's are around every corner and everyone who disagrees with them is a racist are openly applauding a government who is just snatching people off the street for speech!
Stalin and Mao would be very proud of this BS....
originally posted by: BestinShow
a reply to: DieGloke
Unlike the USA, the UK takes it's right to a fair trial seriousl
Yeah right...kinda like it takes its immigration policies seriously.
originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: DieGloke
I get they were concerned and I can even understand that... but to arrest and sentence over a might happen when security could have refused him entry, Seems like they went over board in the wrong direction.
Mr Robinson was given a suspended sentence for contempt of court in May 2017 after he tried to film four men who were on trial accused of raping a teenage girl.
Footage showed Mr Robinson being led to the back of a police van and he could be heard shouting to a friend: “Please, George, get me a solicitor, I’m on a suspended sentence, you see.”
www.thesun.co.uk...
originally posted by: DieGloke
originally posted by: BestinShow
a reply to: DieGloke
Unlike the USA, the UK takes it's right to a fair trial seriousl
Yeah right...kinda like it takes its immigration policies seriously.
We never implemented a patriot act or NDAA which suspends trial rights and allows torture. Nor do we turn our court rooms into media circuses or let our head of state make comments on ongoing court cases
And the fact we left the EU, means we take our border very seriously. Its harder now to get into the UK than the USA.
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
I am somewhat disturbed by the support for this muppet. The man's a criminal who uses a fake name and who co-founded a failed political movement that is now composed of former football hooligans and other assorted trash.
originally posted by: seeker1963
But you will support your government snatching someone off the street for "wrong speak"?
originally posted by: seeker1963
You didn't leave the EU yet, you voted to leave and your corrupt government is dragging it's feet to do so..