It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: midnightstar
Heck with you guys I would arther be in a country with 300 million guns I am still safer and more free then you will ever be/
originally posted by: midnightstar
Heck with you guys I would arther be in a country with 300 million guns I am still safer and more free then you will ever be/
originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: ScepticScot
Nah, there never would be such "contempt" because no person (including judges) have the right or ability (again, armed society) to infringe on our Constitutional rights.
Nothing is more important than our BILL OF RIGHTS. It takes precedent over all those issues you mentioned.
BRITISH IS NOT A RACE It is a nationality. Islam is not a race, it is a religion.
A country of wusses and anti-liberty traitors will never be friends of mine. Period.
originally posted by: JBurns
And don't be surprised if NSA (who generates the PAL codes) implanted a back-door of some sort in those missiles, to shut them down if it best suited us.
In 2007, the UK Government revealed that its nuclear weapons were not equipped with Permissive Action Links.
3. Can the government of the USA prevent, veto or forbid the UK to use its own nuclear weapons? (Answer) No.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: skywatcher44
First of all, he has not been highlighting anything.
He accused the authorities of ignoring criminal offenses on the part of certain individuals, while those individuals were on trial for the very things that he was suggesting had been ignored, which is the most illogical position it is possible to take. You cannot stand in front of a courthouse, complaining that the law is refusing to deal with a thing, when that thing is actually passing through the court system at the time. Its simply not realistic to do so.
Furthermore, if he does die in prison, that will be one less piece of toxic filth that the people of this once great nation, have to deal with going forward.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
The UK doesn’t care about free speech and independent journalism, so this wouldn’t surprise me.
The judge seemed to think different.
'
Judge Norton went on: “This is not about freedom of speech or freedom of the press. This is not about legitimate journalism or political correctness. It’s about justice and ensuring that a trial can be carried out justly and fairly, and ensuring that a jury is not in any way inhibited in carrying out its important function.”
'
originally posted by: Kurokage
originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: SKEPTEK
I'm pleased my ancestors fought and killed these despicable oppressors. I'm also happy we sent their a##es scurrying back across the Atlantic more than once. The British regulars used to wet themselves at the mere mention of President Washington's men.
Time to end this evil alliance. I don't see how the United States can associate with this joke of a "nation" in good conscience. Clearly, they've gone entirely rogue.
Maybe it is time to end this so called "special Friendship" if America is filled with Racist bigots like you, who seem to come into these threads, have no idea about our law and spout your hatred for anything British and twist history to your own agenda and talk about shooting us?!?!?!?! Stop reading tabloid nonsense and maybe try read a history book and a legitimate news feed.
It’s about justice and ensuring that a trial can be carried out justly and fairly
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: skywatcher44
First of all, he has not been highlighting anything.
He accused the authorities of ignoring criminal offenses on the part of certain individuals, while those individuals were on trial for the very things that he was suggesting had been ignored, which is the most illogical position it is possible to take. You cannot stand in front of a courthouse, complaining that the law is refusing to deal with a thing, when that thing is actually passing through the court system at the time. Its simply not realistic to do so.
Furthermore, if he does die in prison, that will be one less piece of toxic filth that the people of this once great nation, have to deal with going forward.
originally posted by: SKEPTEK
originally posted by: Kurokage
originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: SKEPTEK
I'm pleased my ancestors fought and killed these despicable oppressors. I'm also happy we sent their a##es scurrying back across the Atlantic more than once. The British regulars used to wet themselves at the mere mention of President Washington's men.
Time to end this evil alliance. I don't see how the United States can associate with this joke of a "nation" in good conscience. Clearly, they've gone entirely rogue.
Maybe it is time to end this so called "special Friendship" if America is filled with Racist bigots like you, who seem to come into these threads, have no idea about our law and spout your hatred for anything British and twist history to your own agenda and talk about shooting us?!?!?!?! Stop reading tabloid nonsense and maybe try read a history book and a legitimate news feed.
There it is.
Snowflakes use that word so much it has lost all meaning and impact.
If sticking up against tyranny and for free speech makes some a racist bigot than I'd gladly wear that title.