8 signs pointing to a counterintelligence operation deployed against Trump's campaign

But there’s a growing appearance of alleged wrongdoing equally as insidious, if not more so, because it implies widespread misuse of America’s intelligence and law enforcement apparatus.

Here are eight signs pointing to a counterintelligence operation deployed against Trump for political reasons.

Code name

The operation reportedly had at least one code name that was leaked to The New York Times: “Crossfire Hurricane.”

Wiretap fever

Secret surveillance was conducted on no fewer than seven Trump associates: chief strategist Stephen Bannon; lawyer Michael Cohen; national security adviser Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn; adviser and son-in-law Jared Kushner; campaign chairman Paul Manafort; and campaign foreign policy advisers Carter Page and George Papadopoulos.

The FBI reportedly applied for a secret warrant in June 2016 to monitor Manafort, Page, Papadopoulos and Flynn. If true, it means the FBI targeted Flynn six months before his much-debated conversation with Russia’s ambassador, Sergey Kislyak.

thehill.com...

I wholly agree with this article.

Its not just one thing we see from the intel community; its the litany of things combined.

When you factor in the things on this list with other factors such as the way the intel community soft balled the investigation into hillary compared to trump (including allowing hillary people to go free for the very crimes they charged trump people with), the obvious hatred of trump from many high ups in the intel community that were leading or near both investigations (brennan, clapper, comey, mccabe, strzok, etc.), and the stonewalling of the intel community to give legally requested info to congressional oversight, it looks even worse.

Its time for a transparent investigation into what these investogators were doing, and for the evidence to be made public.

a reply to: Grambler

It appears that the evidence is mounting against the deep state, to the point that the tide is turning in the way that the media is reporting things.
A good sign imo.

a reply to: Grambler

As more information is released about Crossfire Hurricane, I think
we will see a wave disgust sweep over the U.S.

When the IG report comes out, we will learn more about the
covert actions of the heads of the FBI and DOJ, and their
minions that were there in many other places fixing things
in what may come to be known as SPYGATE.

a reply to: Grambler

That's all fake news and I'm not buying any of it. And won't. Even if you show me evidence. It's all a conspiracy against the Dems.

See it works both ways.

a reply to: Grambler

I've never understood why Susan Powers should have even had unmasking ability. She did it the most and I'm guessing it was so it could be disseminated to others through her.

a reply to: MiddleInsite

Ignorance?

originally posted by: MiddleInsite
a reply to: Grambler

That's all fake news and I'm not buying any of it. And won't. Even if you show me evidence. It's all a conspiracy against the Dems.

See it works both ways.

Are you claiming that is the mindset I have exhibited?

Please show proof of that.

a reply to: Grambler

Wonderful thread! Americans will be surprised and horribly disappointed when they learn that President Obama orchestrated all of this.

There are so many moving Parts within various agencies that there had to be a single person overseeing all of it right at the very top.

a reply to: pavil

Wasn't Samantha Powers the UN Ambassador or something like that?

originally posted by: MiddleInsite
a reply to: Grambler

That's all fake news and I'm not buying any of it. And won't. Even if you show me evidence. It's all a conspiracy against the Dems.

See it works both ways.

Not really. Almost every piece of "evidence" used by the IA was created or manufactured by them to make their surveillance look legit.

They are self inflicted wounds by the Obama Administration to get Clinton elected. Hell they were even poking around on Jill Stein . I wouldn't doubt they were doing the same to Bernie.

a reply to: Grambler

S + F.

Your painting quite a picture

When are those two reality's gonna clash? When will peoples bubble burst?

It's gonna be scary af me thinks.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: pavil

Wasn't Samantha Powers the UN Ambassador or something like that?

Yes. Why would she need to do that at all. If needed, the CIA would be doing the work for her.

Stinks like a manure dump.

I think we need to disqualify any government agency from doing this investigation that was possibly involved in the coverup and possible crime. The FBI is compromised, so is the CIA. It will be hard to find anyone who can investigate this that can't be bribed by the backers of the Democratic party.

Can't we just fire everyone in Washington and start out new

a reply to: rickymouse

Nothing short of a team of three or four special prosecutors will suffice. These crimes and Scandals are too large for one special prosecutor to handle in a reasonable amount of time.

a reply to: Grambler

I'm a simple guy.

Not the sharpest bulb in the tool shed.


But I have to ask the question;

Would any of this be exposed if Hillary had been elected?

If she had been elected and none of this brought out, then why?

a reply to: rickymouse

Can't we just fire everyone in Washington and start out new

Wish we could but didnt Obama change peoples classifications making them jobs for life? Thats the real problem. You can elect non-Democrats all you want but they are seriously entrenched in the Deep State mechanisms.

a reply to: DBCowboy

If she had been elected, there would never have been all these investigations. And she owns the Deep State. She's got the photographs from the riders of the Lolita Express!

New chatter rumors about the Obama Library being built in Marion, IL instead of Chicago !!

Just rumors of course !!

🤷

originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: DBCowboy

If she had been elected, there would never have been all these investigations. And she owns the Deep State. She's got the photographs from the riders of the Lolita Express!

So that leads me to another simple-minded question.

If it wouldn't have been exposed, then the people angry and fighting the exposure are pro corruption, correct?

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Grambler

I'm a simple guy.

Not the sharpest bulb in the tool shed.


But I have to ask the question;

Would any of this be exposed if Hillary had been elected?

If she had been elected and none of this brought out, then why?

Just goes to show just how corrupt the D's and R's who occupy our countries highest office really are. Mean to tell me the Republicans didn't know about this??? They knew and just allowed it to go on just as the Dems steered the ship. As far as I am concerned, not much of a difference between the corruption in DC than governments in 3rd world snip holes.