CNN - Clapper - Comey - CONSPIRED to Keep President-Elect TRUMP From Being Sworn In on 1.20.2017

Trump conceitedness strikes again.
It's all about him.
Do you guys know he actually said he slanders and slams the media on purpose so that when they publish negative stories about him you guys won't believe them?
You like being emotionally manipulated and led around by your noses?
Oh yes you do.
Now trump is using the same tactic he used on you to convince you the media was false to convince you that the justice dept is incompetent.
And you all will let him even though he admitted that he lies to manipulate the flow of information. Because he also said he loves stupid people.

a reply to: notsure1

Michael Cohen's business partner has plead guilty and is cooperating with Mueller.
The need to steer the narrative this morning is urgent. When ever had news for him is released he goes on a tirade.
He's actually naming his narrative Spygate! What a laugh.

a reply to: dragonridr

Got it ALL figured out skippy? So when does that blackmail begin? Comey should be getting a paycheck no?

originally posted by: carewemust
U.S. Senator John McCain says in his just-released book, that the Anti-Trump Dossier was given to him by a British diplomat, Sir Anthony Wood. He (McCain) then gave it to FBI Director James Comey.

Here is McCain's response to any of you who don't like what he did.

"I did what duty demanded I do," McCain wrote, adding that anyone who disagrees with his decision can "go to hell."

Source: www.businessinsider.com...

Well now
He did his part to stop trump and get hrc elected.
Good lap dog stooge, and if he doesn't like my opinion he can go to hell.

a reply to: carewemust

Trump is a crook and a cheat. Mueller is proving it. Mueller is going to show you all.
That's why trump is so scared. That's why you all are so desperate to find these ridiculous stories to start threads on.
I keep seeing trump throw out conspiracy theories that you guys bring up. I think he has an account here lol.

a reply to: trollz

Think about it. Then consider how stupid an idea it is that a conspiracy of such VAST SCOPE was actually executed. How many people, organizations, The Washington Post, the New York Times, CNN, MSNBC, the DNC, the whole justice department from the CIA to the dept of homeland security and every department in between, the British government AND the Australian gig And even Russian citizens. And no one of the tens of thousands of people required to pull something of this scale together spoke about it. That's some very special thinking.
Guys he's pulling your legs. The whole theory that it's all about trump and that EVERYONE is in cahoots to get him is made up by him to manipulate your feelings and thinking.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Go look in a mirror and you will see the reason they thought they could get away with it.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: trollz

Think about it. Then consider how stupid an idea it is that a conspiracy of such VAST SCOPE was actually executed. How many people, organizations, The Washington Post, the New York Times, CNN, MSNBC, the DNC, the whole justice department from the CIA to the dept of homeland security and every department in between, the British government AND the Australian gig And even Russian citizens. And no one of the tens of thousands of people required to pull something of this scale together spoke about it. That's some very special thinking.
Guys he's pulling your legs. The whole theory that it's all about trump and that EVERYONE is in cahoots to get him is made up by him to manipulate your feelings and thinking.

Yes. I agree with your entire first paragraph. Yet we saw it unfold right before our eyes. It wasn't even a secret. Some parts were hidden but general thrust was obvious. Now that it's documented, let's start doing something about it. 4 years of these scandals - No one has gone to jail. I haven't seen much about Loretta Lynch yet. How is she blameless? She was the head of the DOJ/FBI. Call me if/when they start to lock these people up.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: trollz

Think about it. Then consider how stupid an idea it is that a conspiracy of such VAST SCOPE was actually executed. How many people, organizations, The Washington Post, the New York Times, CNN, MSNBC, the DNC, the whole justice department from the CIA to the dept of homeland security and every department in between, the British government AND the Australian gig And even Russian citizens. And no one of the tens of thousands of people required to pull something of this scale together spoke about it. That's some very special thinking.
Guys he's pulling your legs. The whole theory that it's all about trump and that EVERYONE is in cahoots to get him is made up by him to manipulate your feelings and thinking.

If you think the idea of people within the government and media conspiring to prevent Trump from becoming president is "stupid", then you're simply not in touch with reality.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a conspiracy of such VAST SCOPE was actually executed.

It failed.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
How many people, organizations, The Washington Post, the New York Times, CNN, MSNBC, the DNC, the whole justice department from the CIA to the dept of homeland security

Do you think there aren't Trump haters in positions of authority in every single one of those?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
no one of the tens of thousands of people required to pull something of this scale together spoke about it

You don't need "tens of thousands of people". And, yes, they absolutely did speak about plans to prevent Trump from winning. Many people did.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
it's all about trump and that EVERYONE is in cahoots to get him

No, not everyone. Just some people in positions of authority and management. It's also about people who have political connections and don't want to lose access to their favors or criminal networks.

a reply to: carewemust
a reply to: shooterbrody

So about McCain and that dossier... what should he have done with it if not turn it over to the legal authority?

This is a serious question... because I don't see that McCain had many choices and certainly no good choices... Especially understanding the end game of those who contrived to get it into his grubby little paws. If McCain had received this information and not passed it on to the FBI, and it came out -- and we know it would have -- then McCain would rightfully be accused of protecting Trump from possible treason, and quite possibly accused of aiding and abetting... if he had gone to the press with it, then he could have been accused of publicly revealing state secrets... I just don't see where McCain had any other real choice. Which, of course, was the purpose of those who put it in his hands.

What am I missing?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust

Trump is a crook and a cheat. Mueller is proving it. Mueller is going to show you all.
That's why trump is so scared. That's why you all are so desperate to find these ridiculous stories to start threads on.
I keep seeing trump throw out conspiracy theories that you guys bring up. I think he has an account here lol.

Please list Trumps crimes.

DSDS ("Deep State Delusion Syndrome")

Creative!

Lets see one using "Drain the Swamp"

Trump should have copyrighted that one.

a reply to: Boadicea

www.businessinsider.com...

Sen. John McCain provides intimate details of how he obtained the infamous so-called Steele dossier in his new book, "The Restless Wave." The Republican senator was attending an annual security conference in Halifax, Nova Scotia shortly after the presidential election in November 2016 when retired a British diplomat approached him. According to McCain, he didn't recall ever having a previous conversation with Sir Andrew Wood, but may have met him before in passing. Chris Brose, a staff member on the Senate Armed Services Committee, and David Kramer, a former assistant secretary of state with Russian expertise, joined McCain and Wood in a room off the main conference hall. After discussing Russian election interference for a few minutes, Wood explained why he'd approached McCain in the first place.

"He told me he knew a former MI6 officer by the name of Christopher Steele, who had been commissioned to investigate connections between the Trump campaign and Russian agents as well as potentially compromising information about the President-elect that [Russian President Vladimir] Putin allegedly possessed," McCain wrote. Wood told McCain that Steele had compiled a report, while careful to note the information was unverified, which the former British spy "strongly believed merited a thorough examination by counterintelligence experts." "Our impromptu meeting felt charged with a strange intensity," McCain wrote. "No one wise-cracked to lighten the mood. We spoke in lowered voices. The room was dimly lit, and the atmosphere was eerie." It all seemed "too strange a scenario to believe" at first, he wrote, but the six-term senator felt that "even a remote risk that the President of the United States might be vulnerable to Russian extortion had to be investigated.

So how many other unverified rumors from people he had not met before has Mcstain given to the fbi? If he has previously, then ok no harm. If, as I and others suspect, this is the first time then BS. This was done purely out of partisan politics.
What Mcstain effectively did was take rumors and give them to the fbi to start a bs investigation based on RUMORS. Steele has ADMITTED in court in the uk that the dossier is crap.
www.washingtontimes.com...

In court filings this year, Mr. Steele doesn’t sound as confident as his dossier. He answered questions through his attorney in a libel complaint brought by a Russian entrepreneur, Aleksej Gubarev. Mr. Steele has accused Mr. Gubarev of being pressured by Russian’s FSB intelligence service to take part in hacking against the Democratic Party. In one answer, Mr. Steele refers to the intelligence he gathered as “limited.” On the charge of collusion by Mr. Trump and his campaign advisers, he now says there was only “possible coordination.” His answer was to a question from Mr. Gubarev’s legal team on the lengths he took to brief American reporters as the fall campaign was in full swing. Mr. Steele answered, “The briefings involved the disclosure of limited intelligence regarding indications of Russian interference in the U.S. election process and the possible coordination of members of the Trump’s campaign team and Russian government officials.” At the request of Fusion GPS, the investigative firm hired by Democrats to handle and pay Mr. Steele, the former spy said he briefed The New York Times, The Washington Post, Yahoo News, The New Yorker and CNN in person. He later briefed Mother Jones magazine via Skype. In another indication that Mr. Steele was no longer wholeheartedly vouching for his own findings, he said he told journalists that they may not quote his research. He “understood that the information provided might be used for the purpose of further research, but would not be published or attributed,” he said through his attorney. Mr. Steele also acknowledged that his final December memo, the only one that dealt with Mr. Gubarev, contained information he never vetted. “The contents of the December memorandum did not represent (and did not purport to represent) verified facts, but were raw intelligence which had identified a range of allegations that warranted investigation given their potential national security implications,” he wrote. He added, “Such intelligence was not actively sought; it was merely received.” The unverified “raw intelligence” included Mr. Cohen reported trip to Prague.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
Do you guys know he actually said he slanders and slams the media on purpose so that when they publish negative stories about him you guys won't believe them?

can you show the direct quote? Link please.

Or is this just some innuendo some ordinary potato said? (commentator)

This is what is currently wrong with the USA right now, So much deception,
Lying is not nice silly, and you KNOW you were lying

a reply to: Sillyolme

" Do you guys know he actually said he slanders and slams the media on purpose so that when they publish negative stories about him you guys won't believe their Lies "


Yes , this is True . Liar , Liar , MSM Pants On Fire .............

a reply to: rickymouse

convict them

Sure. Criminal charges are one option.

However, should read the full text of the 5th Amendment. During public emergencies/war, things get interesting.

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

10 U.S. Code § 246

a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
(b) The classes of the militia are—
(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.

Hmmmmmmm.........

originally posted by: Butterfinger

DSDS ("Deep State Delusion Syndrome")

Creative!

Lets see one using "Drain the Swamp"

Trump should have copyrighted that one.

DTs

😁

The Obama administration spied on Trump - oh don't be so stupid say liberals, it didn't happen...har har ,,. conspiracy thoery

A few months later.

The Obama adminstration is found to have spied on Trump - it was for his own good say liberals.

a reply to: UKTruth

The funny part is that they believe all of their lying/populist outrage is actually going to matter

Fortunately, they are accomplishing nothing but galvanizing the pro-Trump crowd. Despite warnings to the radicals from their own party, then continue to energize the GOP base (which actually shows up to vote, and has requisite ID, non-public transportation etc)

Thank you Democrats, thank you Mike Avenatti, thank you Obama hold-overs! You've not only ruined your own careers/reputations, but you've ensured this President will get another 4 year crack at fixing the problems these traitors created. Hegelian Dialectic, the tool of authoritarian traitors.

Hang em high. This is a Constitutionally defined crime, and "enemies" can be foreign or domestic.

a reply to: thedigirati

just how it works. post a few blatant lies, run away, repeat as needed, and never own up to your mistakes.
There are a few here who belong to that club.