Mandela Effect - WTF - The Titanic Never Sank - With Evidence

originally posted by: Pearj

This was published in the evening edition ("final edition" for the day) of The World newspaper:
"Disabled Ship Under Tow After Hitting Big Iceberg"

The headline photo is an actual photo of the damaged Titanic in a harbor in New York (see paper's caption in vid).

This fellow does a good job of explaining it..

Pause the video - switch to 1080 - move the play-head back a tad so it loads in 1080 - make full screen - and read the text for yourself. It's not fake.

No it isn't a picture of the Titanic. The paper has used an image of the sister ship Olympic and crudely etched in the Titanic name.

You can tell it is the Olympic by the non overhanging bridge wings. The Titanic has overhanging bridge wings. Also note the same hull markings on the bow near the water line.

Simply a newspaper manipulating a picture of the Olympic as the Titanic.

See following thread post for images and details.

Link

Not the only paper to manipulate a picture of the Olympic. The Bisbee Daily Review also etched "TITANIC" onto an image of the Olympic.

Link

From

Link

a reply to: RP2SticksOfDynamite

There's a good chance they won't hear you - but I absolutely appreciate the effort.

When they think there's blood in the water, they swarm to feed.. the only option is instinct.

That's the true nature of the beast - we may be seeing that in a new way now; and under new terms.

We should continue to try to help.. ..to stand tall in the middle of the swarm. A few will breathe this new air.

At the end of the day; know we have the power to turn them off and on - like a simple switch..

Our will.

Remember dominion.

originally posted by: Pearj
This thread isn't about the sister ship, or insurance. Yes I'm aware of the theory.

This thread is about a newspaper showing the Titanic at port in a NY harbor - containing very specific reports of the issue, the rescue and the result (docked).

Show me some follow up pictures of the Titanic after the incident and I'll believe you. Show me pictures of the titanic under going repair works. show me pictures of the Titanic after the year it supposedly was bought back to port. IF ... and it's a big IF ... the Titanic was saved where did it go ?? where did it go after it was bought back to port ??

Show me some solid evidence and not some nut on a YouTube video.

originally posted by: RP2SticksOfDynamite

The ME effect is nonsense! My that is a bold statement.

All I have to say is
1. Do we live in a multi dimensional universe?
2. Are there multiple timelines?
3. Does time (although a figment of our perception and imagination) and dimension overlap?
4. Has there been many experiences and memories of the same thing by so many?
5. Is there much secrecy around LHC activities and other research?
6. Is the universe or even a spoon conscious?

If the answer to the above is possibly then I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss ME.

I have my own memories and things don't add up!

I got my own set of problems on that front. Where I come from, Challenger blew up in 1984. I know, because I know where I was, my science teacher, and even what I was doing when it all went to hell. I know what age I was. I know I was in junior high, and this was before other events happened.

Now... the thing went up in 1986, and I'm thrown into chaos, because everything's screwed to hell. I know where I was in 1986. I know I was in high school, and I had my own set of chaos to put up with there. not a BIT of it involved the shuttle exploding.

Except, that never happened now. :/ It's a hell of a feeling.

originally posted by: Pearj


This fellow does a good job of explaining it..

Pause the video - switch to 1080 - move the play-head back a tad so it loads in 1080 - make full screen - and read the text for yourself. It's not fake.

That fellow certainly has not done a "good job". The question is why he or even yourself haven't done any research on those newspaper images? At 3:03 he is reporting on The Daily Mirror story and commenting on the picture of the Titanic being towed and claiming that it was clearly not sunk based on the picture. It is just mind numbing that people are even listening to him. That image the newspaper is using is one that was taken in Southampton, England as the Titanic was leaving port.

See following links and note image. The image was simply a series of images taken as the Titanic left from Southampton.

Link 1

Link 2

a reply to: tommyjo

The Mandela effect relies on faulty memory this isn't a group that will do research. People who would do research realize they were mistaken and would never post in the first place. The Mandela effect is people with an arrogance who believe they can not make mistakes and their opinions superceeds all available facts. Takes a major narcasist yo assume your correct over all available information.

this is less a mandela effect and more proof of your forged history
everthing that happened millenia ago to more or less 1920 is forged history, more baout this amazing and mindblowing conspiracy theory here: www.reddit.com...
www.stolenhistory.org...
this is a subject wich i am doing heavy research right now and think every ats-er should do the same
godspeed

a reply to: eriktheawful

hah debunked like 5 posts in

a reply to: Pearj

I agree with the title of your new series

a reply to: Zarniwoop

heh

a reply to: wylekat

I thought you were anti-ME?

That's cool though - it is a weird feeling.

a reply to: Pearj

Wireless: As an actual expert on RF transmissions (credentials in working with military radar systems and electronic engineering in the field of electromagnetic transmissions), I can tell you now that the operators of that time were operating equipment plagued with problems, break downs, and with a very hard understanding of how radio signals can literally bounce around due to refection of the atmosphere (temps and humidity play a big part).

Communications then were not very reliable, messages were garbled often, operator mistakes happened, and station identification was confusing.

It also was not always "real time" as messages going very long distances had to be relayed from one station to another.



Having a hard time believing that the ship sunk: Yes actually.

HMS Titanic was the supreme version of technology of her day. People really thought at the time that we had conquered so many things, including building a ship that the press promoted as "Unsinkable".

Ships did sink, yes. But never had one that size sunk (mainly because they didn't have too many built to that size), and people really did buy into the idea that she could take a hull breech and not sink.

Think also about how this was her maiden voyage......a brand new ship of that size....sinking because she hit an iceberg?

Here's the word that went through most people's mind back in 1912: Absurd!

But of course it wasn't absurd. It was reality, because the ships they built back then did not really have water tight containment. Not in the way that ships would be built decades later. They also had a hard time accepting the fact that a ship the size of the Titanic could have more than a couple of compartments flooded, and certainly not five! Unheard of! There is no way that ship could have that happen......but it did.

Look back at the history of the lack of life boats, and the lack of life boat drills. They really did think that ships built like the Titanic could not ever sink. Even the survivors onboard later said that there was no sense of great urgency at first, because they really thought the ship could not sink......which shows the arrogance, ignorance, and belief that humans had built something that had conquered the seas.

Truth is: even the most modern military ships we have now will sink like a rock if all the wrong things happen.



Take yourself back to that period of time and look around - communications take a long time. Wireless is new, not very dependable, fraught with problems - garbled messages, wrong messages, and wireless men who were actually more company men (the wireless companies at the time) than anything else.

This was also only 11 years after the end of the Victorian Era - Britain ruled the seas and had a empire that the sun never set on. The rush of the industrial revolution had not settled. New technology was showing up all the time, so the belief that humans were pretty much conquering nature was not a uncommon belief back then.



In today's world, most people are not quite so arrogant about horrible news like this. Planes fall out of the sky, mass pile ups on the highway, etc, and people don't really bat an eyelash of those stories.

Or do we?

Think about all the recent collisions the US Navy has had with their ships. Any shock and disbelief there? Yes, because we know that technology is much better, and having personally had a career in the US Navy, it was shocking to me too at first. No way those things could be happening.....and if they are, it MUST BE the fault of the non-military ships!.....which was not all true.

So in my humble opinion, the incorrect reporting about the HMS Titanic isn't really ME, just an good example of a world that was shocked over something that just should not of happened, and a wireless reporting system that was still in it's infancy, and news papers wanting to sell their news papers.

I'll bet if you look hard enough, you'll find other examples of this....even after communications were much better decades later, all because the news wanted to get their edition out first.....and so made a LOT of assumptions about something, or could not believe that the facts would be different:

If I remember correctly the sister ship had an accident just before hand.
My bet it is the sister ship what is in port.
Oh and the Mandela effect is just our memories which are falable.

Once again the OP has had it explained to him that this is simply fake news and it has also been explained in patient detail exactly how this headline came about, but it's "fingers in ears" time - yet again.

Just when I thought ME could not get sillier.

originally posted by: Pearj
a reply to: wylekat

I thought you were anti-ME?

That's cool though - it is a weird feeling.

Boy- you're telling me. I lost 2 years to this somewhere, or gained 2- I'm not sure which.

I love it when people begin to fnd evidence of crimes of the past and then try to represent them as some nutty crapjob called the mandala effect...what a croc of garbage.....people are simply catching the people who have been in control of the publishing Industry manipulating us with lies...as Trump and Friends say...its fake news....and now we are seeing very very early examples of this psychological warfare which was disguised as business and which was used to paralyse and enslave and entire Nation and eventually and entire Globe or Planet.

They were flying by the seat of their pants....making on-the-fly decisions....and they had full and complete control of the press...absolute control....the Titanics Sister Ship had already been damaged....it had already been in an accident....this is why the entire scam was organised....they couldnt re-insure the Titanics Sister Ship without making expensive and massive repairs....like the Trade Towers in NY we saw demolished for the same reasons....sooooo...they switched the Titanics name plate with her Sister Ship ...sailed the damaged ship out under the Titanic nameplate...sank it...and collected the insurance money. The Titanic not sunk that night.

originally posted by: Pearj
This thread isn't about the sister ship, or insurance. Yes I'm aware of the theory.

This thread is about a newspaper showing the Titanic at port in a NY harbor - containing very specific reports of the issue, the rescue and the result (docked).

and its been explained precisely why and shown more article doing the same thing and printing incorrect news.

But what so funny is that the explanation and evidence to back it is misinterpreted by you to fit your agenda and bias

I think you found more residue - take a close look at the images in the papers you posted - and the text.

the text?

That says "later reports says she is sinking"?

This thread isn't about the sister ship, or insurance. Yes I'm aware of the theory.

Oh really.

you are so sure of that?


You did check that the image really is the Titanic and not the Olympic?

a reply to: InhaleExhale


At least Flat Earther's will argue for their beliefs - even if their arguments are rubbish.

This ME thing seems to be all about certain posters who believe in ME just sticking their fingers in their ears and shouting that only the "Effected" can understand whats going on and that the "Naysayers" just don't get it or are trolls or whatever when others explain why they are mistaken.

I honestly did not believe that these ME threads could get any sillier but this one proves me wrong.

And Thomas E. Dewey won the 1948 presidential election. Here's the newspaper that proves it!

Odd that Harry S Truman looks so happy for having just lost the election.

Beyond the third dimension Some string theorists have taken this idea further to explain a mystery of gravity that has perplexed physicists for some time – why is gravity so much weaker than the other fundamental forces? Does its carrier, the graviton, exist and where?
The idea is that we do not feel gravity’s full effect in the everyday world. Gravity may appear weak only because its force is being shared with other spatial dimensions. To find out whether these ideas are just products of wild imaginations or an incredible leap in understanding will require experimental evidence. But how? High-energy experiments could prise open the inconspicuous dimensions just enough to allow particles to move between the normal 3D world and other dimensions.

This could be manifest in the sudden disappearance of a particle into a hidden dimension, or the unexpected appearance of a particle in an experiment. Who knows where such a discovery could lead!

public-archive.web.cern.ch...

Instead of particles I think the "object" that showed up in the collider tube was from somewhere and the opening caused us changes here and there.