Purely political, Roundhead or Cavalier? ...royal bs wedding.

a reply to: spingersbane
Haha, they did have the best hats, I'll concede that!

a reply to: spingersbane
Calais?! It's a #hole these days, they can keep it

originally posted by: CornishCeltGuy
a reply to: spingersbane
Haha, they did have the best hats, I'll concede that!

a reply to: spingersbane
Calais?! It's a #hole these days, they can keep it

Yeah good idea. Though I am sure we have a Trump hotel or two we could turn into a refugee camp

a reply to: spingersbane
Open up one of the palaces or castles for that, plenty of room!
...that's assuming Parliamentarians win the war of course

originally posted by: CornishCeltGuy
a reply to: spingersbane
Open up one of the palaces or castles for that, plenty of room!
...that's assuming Parliamentarians win the war of course

Good idea!

The royal family can get a council house in Hackney

Good enough for other familys living off the state good enough for them

a reply to: spingersbane

Haha yes! Do you reckon Meghan will have to pass the citizenship test same as the rest of us serfs?
I reckon she'll get a hall pass for that as well.

originally posted by: CornishCeltGuy
a reply to: spingersbane

Haha yes! Do you reckon Meghan will have to pass the citizenship test same as the rest of us serfs?
I reckon she'll get a hall pass for that as well.

Nope the privileged cow will get a free pass on that!

a reply to: CornishCeltGuy

Im here (he says whilst twirling his magnificent mustachiod visog). Hiya!

Although i absolutely only support a constitutional monarchy and not an absolute monarchy. That said, from what little i have seen of Harry, i would happily follow him to war rather than the vast majority of our elected house - who genuinely appear to be vacuous f wits with an extremely limited grasp on reality, regardless of political affiliation.

a reply to: spingersbane

Lol probably, I wonder if she will relinquish US citizenship as well, the US is one of only two countries to tax its citizens on earnings overseas, the other country is Eritrea.
I wonder what her income will be as well, no civil list payments for her marrying into the firm? She ain't gonna be skint though that's for sure.

a reply to: Flavian

I'm actually with you on that, I like Harry, he's served, and cares for those who have served.

a reply to: CornishCeltGuy

You also get the impression that if he took us to war, it would be for a proper reason. Not because someones share value had dropped too low in oil / armaments (insert other spurious reason also).

Plus, and this is the real winner for me, i could actually imagine going for a pint with Harry!

originally posted by: Flavian
a reply to: CornishCeltGuy

Im here (he says whilst twirling his magnificent mustachiod visog). Hiya!

Although i absolutely only support a constitutional monarchy and not an absolute monarchy. That said, from what little i have seen of Harry, i would happily follow him to war rather than the vast majority of our elected house - who genuinely appear to be vacuous f wits with an extremely limited grasp on reality, regardless of political affiliation.

I would support the monarchy if there was reform. It members should receive the wage of a senior diplomat and have to use state education and the NHS.

a reply to: Flavian

Yes I agree, and I also hope Charles will be as outspoken as king as he is now. The only constitutional crisis is if he refuses to sign an act off or something, but he could nail it if he starts mouthing off for the people when the government are out of line.
Hell I'd be a royalist if he was 'the people's king', could be interesting times ahead.
...and yep I'd imagine having a laugh with Harry over a game of pool and a pint, I'd definitely ask him if he shagged Pippa or not lol

originally posted by: Flavian
a reply to: CornishCeltGuy

You also get the impression that if he took us to war, it would be for a proper reason. Not because someones share value had dropped too low in oil / armaments (insert other spurious reason also).

Plus, and this is the real winner for me, i could actually imagine going for a pint with Harry!

Have done (well night around a campfire breaking bread and sharing stories when he came to open up a mental health 'eco therapy' program at work and backed it nationally (he's made a lot of royal estates/areas like Snowdonia convert to places where those most in need can get help and support. He's a proper sound lad, could have a good chat with him, nothing fake or fancy about him and got a nice letter from him/kensington palace a couple of weeks later. Will seems nice too, both have made a huge positive difference by being open about their personal MH experiences and managed to get the media, government and funding bodies to pull their finger out.

I can tolerate a constitutional Monarchy under Liz and think it'd be beneficial with Will and Harry (pretty certain they'd stop any government going to war unless only resort, they have stories from being there) but Charles seems an absolute fruit.

a reply to: bastion

Cool story thanks for sharing
Charles the 'fruit' though lol, I actually like some of what he stands for in public, and with William and Harry on his case I think he could be an extremely interesting king. If he spouted out about important issues for the people, inspired by his lads, then he could be a revolutionary king...if that isn't an oxymoron.
Say he spoke out for the people he could nail it potentially, shaming government while acts are being debated. Yes that would be against protocol but he could get away with it, especially if he got tabloid backup. Interesting times for sure in my mind when he becomes king.

originally posted by: CornishCeltGuy
a reply to: bastion

Cool story thanks for sharing

Charles the 'fruit' though lol, I actually like some of what he stands for in public, and with William and Harry on his case I think he could be an extremely interesting king. If he spouted out about important issues for the people, inspired by his lads, then he could be a revolutionary king...if that isn't an oxymoron.
Say he spoke out for the people he could nail it potentially, shaming government while acts are being debated. Yes that would be against protocol but he could get away with it, especially if he got tabloid backup. Interesting times for sure in my mind when he becomes king.

Yeah, if the public love him the government won't dare touch him even if he is shaming them.

a reply to: aliensquirrelmonkey

That's how I see it.
I reckon if I was Charles I'd play that angle and win the people over by challenging the government on issues the majority of public and tabloids agree on.
He could nail it, especially with the advice of his lads.

you have had a fair old jab at the royals earlier on yet no criticism of parliament.

let us time travel back a spell to some base examples in my opinion.

tony blair sodomizing democracy whilst selling the gulf lie. never forgiven never forgotton. david kelly rip.

coal miners pension/benevolent fund stripped of approx £11 billion by the above muppet.

trafigura waste dumping in third world countries .

mp's fiddling expenses.

mp's fiddling younglings eg cyril smith.

50+ peers becoming very rich after passing tranches of privatisation of the nhs.

offshoring of profits made for consultations and the socialisation of debt think bhs, carillion, the banks etc.

targetting of the most vulnerable of society and making them jump through hoops in order to survive. many have
died before,during and after the interrogation process.

gentrification and the mass movement of the poverty stricken people away from their communities.

the trans-boundary migration of all our personal information and the hacking of..... think credit ratings.

if i was a fish that could wish, i would wish...

all parliamentarians, civil servants, holders of public office or any with authority over the common folk
to undergo mandatory daily substance tests for all substances with harsh penalties and instant dismissal
from office be it disco biscuits or booze. from the top down. siemens may be interested in tendering (lobbying)
for this system.

and while we are at it as above, the likes of tempora,c/a,prism,5/9eyes you have made life hard for the good people seeking
justice and truth, stuff ya'll theres a huge voodoo chilli on the boil.
be careful coz the lase may sting.
f

a reply to: fakedirt

Yep, I have had a jab at the unelected head of state institution, start your own thread if you wanna whine about the elected Parliament.
Now, argue why I should support a constitutional monarchy or stop whining.

a reply to: CornishCeltGuy


there is a term in parliament lingo and it suits you down to a tee lol. flip-flop. your thread speaks for itself. you have the potential to make a robust politician.
have a nice day, f.

originally posted by: Flavian
a reply to: CornishCeltGuy

Im here (he says whilst twirling his magnificent mustachiod visog). Hiya!

Although i absolutely only support a constitutional monarchy and not an absolute monarchy. That said, from what little i have seen of Harry, i would happily follow him to war rather than the vast majority of our elected house - who genuinely appear to be vacuous f wits with an extremely limited grasp on reality, regardless of political affiliation.

Harry is a good lad and is still a soldier and Real citizen for the UK.

If we have a real king one day then Harry and his sexy little foxy minx are the real deals as far as I am concerned...

#princessmeginlatex

Warmest regards

Lags