Clapper- It’s ‘A Good Thing’ FBI Was Spying On Trump Campaign

a reply to: xuenchen


Clapper + Brennan + Comey = Pejury and Obstruction...for starters.

a reply to: queenofswords

And the "Russian" thing is an ironic joke in itself.

Democrats supporting open borders and then scream when the say "Russian" foreigners crossed their little fire"wall" !!

😀

a reply to: RickyD

Yeah yeah. Meanwhile the #ing MOUNTAIN of inconvenient facts about Trump and his cronies is all the FBI and the left picking on him. Not buying it. I sure hope you come and personally apologize to me when you turn out to be wrong and this investigation isn't ended thanks to this "revelation" in the OP. I won't hold my breath though. I'm expecting another rearrangement of the goal posts and on this desperate song-and-dance continues. I've been listening to you guys tell me (and laugh at me) for two years now saying that this investigation will end "soon" and it still hasn't.

a reply to: Kharron

Same thing happens with CNN websites.

More with MSNBC 😎

😆

a reply to: Krazysh0t

You will get the surprise of your life in October.

🎁😎🚬

a reply to: Krazysh0t

More dodging and deflections...care to point out what they have shown trump to have done illegally? As well as the statutes broken?

Or you just gonna dodge my questions and keep up your deflection.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: dawnstar

#Foxlandia doesn't care about justice anymore. They only want to prosecute the left for made up crimes.

I believe the IG will release a report showing that the crimes you are claiming are made up where investigated so poorly that it, itself, is actually criminal.

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Krazysh0t

You will get the surprise of your life in October.

🎁😎🚬

What's going to happen in October?

originally posted by: RickyD
a reply to: Krazysh0t

More dodging and deflections...care to point out what they have shown trump to have done illegally? As well as the statutes broken?

Where did I EVER once say that Trump did something illegal? This investigation encompasses more than just Trump you know?

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: dawnstar

#Foxlandia doesn't care about justice anymore. They only want to prosecute the left for made up crimes.

I believe the IG will release a report showing that the crimes you are claiming are made up where investigated so poorly that it, itself, is actually criminal.

Wanna bet? I'd really like to see one of you actually put your foot down on this "Carrot on a stick" syndrome I've been watching for 2 years now. Instead of pushing the goal posts back on trying to find ANYTHING to call this investigation illegal every time one of these carrots doesn't pan out, actually ADMIT that it is a legit investigation when shown wrong. Somehow I doubt you will take that offer up though.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

More bojangling I see...well sir I think you have proven you're like trying to converse with a brick wall...

a reply to: RickyD

Whatever you say buddy. You are the one inventing strawmans about me proclaiming guilt, but I'M the one at fault for correcting you. So can I take it you won't be issuing an apology to me in a week or so if (when) that IG report doesn't pan out?

originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: xuenchen

This is a pattern we see over an over.

First the anti trumpers laughed and said there was no spying.

Then when they have to admit there was; they say that it was a good thing that it happened.

They dont care about corruption and weaponizing the intel community, as long as its their side doing it.

I wish they would just come out and admit that instead of pretending that it didnt happen.

This is all Trunps fault for laundering dirty Russian money through his many business dealings, that’s why Britain’s Inteligence picked up on him and his friends when investigating Russian criminals years before his election

He’s a crook, and unfit for any office of power

a reply to: Krazysh0t

Pretty sure it already has panned out more than the SC investigation...just look at the small part already released. What we are hearing about the next part is that the very people you are lending so much credence to were criminal themselves. Back to all these indictments that are just barely starting to be unsealed. Now why are they only starting to open that up in places where corrupt DOJ officials and judges have been removed? I think you know why but I doubt you'd admit it here.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: dawnstar

#Foxlandia doesn't care about justice anymore. They only want to prosecute the left for made up crimes.

I believe the IG will release a report showing that the crimes you are claiming are made up where investigated so poorly that it, itself, is actually criminal.

Wanna bet? I'd really like to see one of you actually put your foot down on this "Carrot on a stick" syndrome I've been watching for 2 years now. Instead of pushing the goal posts back on trying to find ANYTHING to call this investigation illegal every time one of these carrots doesn't pan out, actually ADMIT that it is a legit investigation when shown wrong. Somehow I doubt you will take that offer up though.

Explain what is legit about the Trump investigation.

Lets start with the SC charter...what was he authorized to investigate? And what is the evidence of there being a crime committed that was a predicate to a criminal investigation?

As we have seen the last week...it was picked up directly from an FBI counterintelligence investigation. Not a criminal investigation. So...what crime was committed that was being investigated? Without a crime being present, how do you know you need to find a perpetrator?

I have no idea if the Mueller investigation is legal. I suspect it isn't.

Now that I have your whataboutism out of the way, back to my point: there is an email server investigation that was botched so badly by the FBI that its being called criminal by the IG.

This is the same FBI that has had its top 2 folks fired. Has had a slew of other top ranking folks demoted or fired. Has seen at least one of the top 2 being referred for criminal charges. On top of all the prior crap (Waco, Ruby Ridge, Dallas). Just exactly what kind of faith am I expected to have in the results of an investigation done by Mueller?

originally posted by: Whereismypassword

originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: xuenchen

This is a pattern we see over an over.

First the anti trumpers laughed and said there was no spying.

Then when they have to admit there was; they say that it was a good thing that it happened.

They dont care about corruption and weaponizing the intel community, as long as its their side doing it.

I wish they would just come out and admit that instead of pretending that it didnt happen.

This is all Trunps fault for laundering dirty Russian money through his many business dealings, that’s why Britain’s Inteligence picked up on him and his friends when investigating Russian criminals years before his election

He’s a crook, and unfit for any office of power

Thats your opinion, and not only are you welcome to it, but I hope you shout it loud and proud, and the others that agree witn you finally become honest and do the same.

You and others have no problem with Obama having spies put in place, getting phone records, wiretapping trump associates, etc., because you KNOW that trump is guilty of something.

I am sure Brennan and comey and Mcacbe and clapper all agree with you.

So no more need for them to stonewall; just come out iwth the truth, and lets see what the ameircan people think about the intel community being weaponized in this manner.

This thread is great, especially since the source is a subscription based extremist website, that cannot be verified.

However, it's great because it tells us one of three things about the posters who seem to have read it:

a) they pay for a subscription to an extremist website
b) they work together and work provides access to the website
c) they post without reading

All three of these are fantastic tells. Thank you.

a reply to: Kharron

4. people aren't dumb enough to click on random links they see online because they like not having their computer hacked or identity stolen, so discuss the information contained in the OP instead

You shouldn't let your lack of imagination limit you.

a reply to: Kharron

When all else fails attack the source right? I'm sure your search engine of choice couldn't possibly point you to an alternative source for the quotes from clapper. Would you like me to hold your hand and walk you through it?

originally posted by: Kharron
This thread is great, especially since the source is a subscription based extremist website, that cannot be verified.

However, it's great because it tells us one of three things about the posters who seem to have read it:

a) they pay for a subscription to an extremist website
b) they work together and work provides access to the website
c) they post without reading

All three of these are fantastic tells. Thank you.

The daily caller is no more extremely than the New York Times

I can see it without paying

And it links directly to the video from cnn