It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The quick take on the 4,100-word opus is that the Gray Lady “buried the lede.” Fair enough: You have to dig pretty deep to find that the FBI ran “at least one government informant” against the Trump campaign — and to note that the Times learned this because “current and former officials” leaked to reporters the same classified information about which, just days ago, the Justice Department shrieked “Extortion!” when Congress asked about it.
But that’s not even the most important of the buried ledes. What the Times story makes explicit, with studious understatement, is that the Obama administration used its counterintelligence powers to investigate the opposition party’s presidential campaign.
That is, there was no criminal predicate to justify an investigation of any Trump-campaign official. So, the FBI did not open a criminal investigation. Instead, the bureau opened a counterintelligence investigation and hoped that evidence of crimes committed by Trump officials would emerge. But it is an abuse of power to use counterintelligence powers, including spying and electronic surveillance, to conduct what is actually a criminal investigation.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Grambler
Democrats heads will explode when they learn that President Barack Obama himself OK'd this multi-faceted operation against President Trump.
originally posted by: Pyle
Since when was an informant relaying information to law enforcement spying?
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Grambler
Democrats heads will explode when they learn that President Barack Obama himself OK'd this multi-faceted operation against President Trump.
originally posted by: annoyedpharmacist
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
If they are spinning it then that means they can no longer hide it.
This is all going to come out and be confirmed, that is the whole purpose of the NYT''s piece. To get out in front of the story.
originally posted by: annoyedpharmacist
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
If they are spinning it then that means they can no longer hide it.
This is all going to come out and be confirmed, that is the whole purpose of the NYT''s piece. To get out in front of the story.
originally posted by: Lumenari
originally posted by: Pyle
Since when was an informant relaying information to law enforcement spying?
Since when was spying on an American citizen spying, you mean...
I bet you your mental gymnastics since Nov 20 2016 have changed you to the point that you have to screw your socks on in the morning.
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: Pyle
Since when was an informant relaying information to law enforcement spying?
It starts in earnest....
You are right, people are doing there best to conflate informant with spy. I wonder how this whole thing will end.
originally posted by: Lumenari
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Grambler
Democrats heads will explode when they learn that President Barack Obama himself OK'd this multi-faceted operation against President Trump.
Not really.
After all, Stormy will fix it and why does it matter at this point anyway?
Obama was just trying to stop the orange antichrist!!!!
Trump took THREE scoops of ice cream this week... ZOMFG stop the presses!!!!!
That is all you are going to see from the DNC organ formerly known as our news agencies if that happens.
Obama was just trying to stop the orange antichrist!!!!
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: Pyle
Since when was an informant relaying information to law enforcement spying?
It starts in earnest....
You are right, people are doing there best to conflate informant with spy. I wonder how this whole thing will end.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: Pyle
Since when was an informant relaying information to law enforcement spying?
It starts in earnest....
You are right, people are doing there best to conflate informant with spy. I wonder how this whole thing will end.
What do you call a person the fbi asks to contact people and assertain info from them?
How about when the fbi gets a fisa warrant to wiretap a phone?
How about when the fbi us s papers to jcome t even have to get a warrant to get phone records on people?
I would call that spying
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: Lumenari
originally posted by: Pyle
Since when was an informant relaying information to law enforcement spying?
Since when was spying on an American citizen spying, you mean...
I bet you your mental gymnastics since Nov 20 2016 have changed you to the point that you have to screw your socks on in the morning.
What? An informant is not a spy. Similar as they both give information to others but are very different things.
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: Pyle
Since when was an informant relaying information to law enforcement spying?
It starts in earnest....
You are right, people are doing there best to conflate informant with spy. I wonder how this whole thing will end.
If the FBI put a person in before there was an investigation of a real documented crime to inform on, then it is spying.