oodly similar ufo pictures

a reply to: humanoidlord

(wink)

a reply to: Whatsthisthen

ok i guess
moving on

originally posted by: Blue Shift

originally posted by: mtnshredder
I've always thought that the older ufo pics shared a strong resemblance to model train wheels.

Well, at first glance, the Heflin UFO in these photos looks a lot like a model train wheel. But if you look a little closer, you'll notice that it's actually asymmetrical and has a kind of shiny, possibly transparent dome on top. It actually looks more like a fedora.

If you took the earlier ones I posted, (which has a slight taper from top to brim) and shined them up and a little fishing line to suspend them from something above and out of pic and I think it may be close to some of the photos.
Just the sceptic in me thinking aloud.

The real question is, except for those "orbs" people sometimes see, why don't we see more (or any) absolutely identical UFOs popping up. Yeah, we get some that are close to looking the same, but there's always a difference.

It's like each UFO is a one-off. That unlike cars -- where you can drive down the street and see four Honda Accords -- there is apparently no place that manufactures a bunch of identical UFOs that show up in different places at different times.

Seems very inefficient. And not only that, once you invented the best flying saucer that did everything you wanted a flying saucer to do, why would you change the design?

a reply to: Blue Shift

vallee is the answer

originally posted by: humanoidlord
vallee is the answer

Sure, sure. Interpretation and possibly physical manifestation of an unknown through each individual's perception.

It's too bad that Vallee doesn't really offer an answer, only more conjecture based on some mysterious perceptual mechanism.

a reply to: Blue Shift

still a better solution than screaming aliens and running away

a reply to: Phage

My favorite "UFO" was the coleman lantern parts used to pathetically
fake a saucer. Billy Meyer did it, if I recall.

A lot of people think at first that I'm some nasty UFO debunker..
as something like 95% of the cases out there are either misidentification
or fraud.

I don't see how striving for accuracy in researching a topic is a bad thing..

But i'm in the minority I guess.

Kev

a reply to: Blue Shift

I find that hilarious too.

We must be the planet of giants.

I mean look at Apollo missions. Every pound taken took a huge
toll on fuel requirements..

So I guess it makes sense that most or all space aliens are actually
"little people".

Just that there, disproves the 7 foot tall nordic females with perfect
breasts as being a delusionary fantasy.. well that and the fact it's
obviously a juvenile fantasy.

a reply to: Blue Shift

I told Vallee that very point, when he was on my couch.

It's strong proof that the ETH is rubbish.

Unless you want to postulate, that some nimrod found a way
for all realities to come visit us.. by opening some physical
wormhole to the hub of all parallel earths.

But that doesn't explain why all those parallel earths are sending
ships to our world, just to kill cattle and anally probe us.. and
lie to us..

but never to land and make a decent introduction to a human
authority figure.

a reply to: Blue Shift

you are spot on correct there.

But Vallee was 50 years ahead of everyone else, by making the proper
observations and asking the proper questions.

He did a real service to the human race. I put him up there only a couple
levels below Darwin.

Its unfortunate though, that he SEEMS to have fallen in with a disreputable
bunch, and I no longer respect his current work.

I'd have loved to work with a fantastic mind like his.. more than i did.

Kev

originally posted by: KellyPrettyBear
a reply to: Blue Shift



It's strong proof that the ETH is rubbish.

Horsefeathers!!!

but never to land and make a decent introduction to a human
authority figure.

I should sincerely hope not...what with the kind of riff raff leading our world today.

a reply to: Erno86

Both the founding fathers of ufoligy were against the ETH. But lets not do an intractable argument on that.

But the second point about meeting a reputable world leader out in the open...

There have been many reputable world leaders...not all of them were bad...

Kev

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: humanoidlord

I prefer saucers to triangles and orbs.

Flying saucers have been documented --- but not verified ---- to be sometimes safely cocooned inside a magnetically contained fiery plasma energy orb --- sometimes labeled as a "foo fighter."

I have always thought that the UFO "metallic saucer types" have always been secret government projects.

originally posted by: KellyPrettyBear
a reply to: Erno86

Both the founding fathers of ufoligy were against the ETH. But lets not do an intractable argument on that.

But the second point about meeting a reputable world leader out in the open...

There have been many reputable world leaders...not all of them were bad...

Kev

Sure..."not all of them were bad," but the power of a foo fighter is relative to say...a weapon of mass destruction, that is --- most likely --- an interstellar capable craft; that could possibly threaten other interstellar civilizations at the behest of some Earth world leader.

a reply to: Erno86

So come down with a simple lander craft not using such fancy tech.

Any biological alien with 100 IQ would think of that.

Or a simple tech flying drone running off battery power.

Or send a tv broadcast from the moon.

The list of brain dead simple alternatives is endless.

originally posted by: KellyPrettyBear
a reply to: Erno86

So come down with a simple lander craft not using such fancy tech.

Any biological alien with 100 IQ would think of that.

Or a simple tech flying drone running off battery power.

Or send a tv broadcast from the moon.

The list of brain dead simple alternatives is endless.

But there are lots of things that can wrong over such "endless" alternatives...all the way up to interstellar war, disease and pestilence --- that Nobel Peace prize for Trump doesn't look too plausible now, does it? --- to trade wars, and it seems safe to say that the Trump team isn't ready for any of those possibilities. Maybe it won't have to deal with any serious challenges. But what if it does?

a reply to: Erno86

Have a nice day.

Kev