It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Vasa Croe
If that's who the NRA wants, then what's the big deal?
It's about preserving and defending an enumerable right.
Something the left wants gone.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Nyiah
Is the 2nd Amendment in such jeopardy that we need to sell it?
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Nyiah
To be fair, the Shah was a wee bit different than the Ayatollah.
www.nytimes.com...
''Colonel North made a passing reference to, something to the effect 'Wait until it's learned that the Ayatollah is funding the contras.' ''
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Nyiah
Is the 2nd Amendment in such jeopardy that we need to sell it?
Considering they want a gun runner to a enemy to run the NRA, I'd say it's already been sold & certainly not to the right audience.
It's funny how this logic works. Giving Iran their money back decades after holding it = bad. Running guns to Iran in the thick of what solidified them as a proverbial arch-enemy = good. What the actual F.
originally posted by: ridgerunner
Iran and Iraq were at each others throat at the time.Enemy of my enemy? Keeping your enemies focused on each other isn`t a bad thing.