Guliani admits Trump lied about paying off stormy Daniels.

Oops..

Rudy guliani just came out and admitted trump did repay Cohen for the 130k payoff to hide the affair from the American people directly before the election.

Which trump has repeatedly publicly denied VEHEMENTLY...


Everyone knew he was lying, but still the lies continued..
www.cnn.com...

Rudy Giuliani said Wednesday that President Donald Trump paid back his personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, the $130,000 in hush money that was used to pay off Stormy Daniels. The payment is going to turn out to be "perfectly legal," Giuliani said in an interview with Fox News' Sean Hannity.

He claims it wasn’t breaking election law, but it obviously was.. that said more than a few people have walked after breaking campaign finance law. John Edwards did the same with his mistress and wasn’t charged, or was found not guilty.


It is appearently really hard to prove , or they just don’t wanna lose their backroom payoff channels..

Corporations and labor organizations (including officers, directors or other representatives acting as agents of corporations and labor organizations) are prohibited from facilitating the making of contributions to candidates or political committees, other than to the separate segregated funds of the corporations and labor organizations. Facilitation means using corporate or labor organization resources or facilities to engage in fundraising activities in connection with any federal election …”

Here is a copy of the staute in question.

He claims it wasn’t breaking election law, but it obviously was.

''that money was not campaign money, no campaign finance violation''

So Trump paid back $130,000 from his personal bank accounts to the law-firm to Stormy Daniels

How is it breaking the law?

Strategy Strategy

Comfort Zones Comfort Zones

Invoices Invoices

Fees Fees

Retainers Retainers

😃

a reply to: JoshuaCox

He claims it wasn’t breaking election law, but it obviously was..

How?

a reply to: JoshuaCox


I wonder what Giuliani was thinking? Did he think he was protecting the President by making such an admission? I wouldn't be at all surprised to learn that Giuliani is the one that leaked the list of Mueller Questions.

Daniels made a contract to keep her mouth shut.
she got money and the reneged on the agreement.
She is the one I see who is the moral failure.

Now we are taking the word of a porn star over the President of the United States.
Things can't sink any lower.
JFK screwed lots of women in the White House.
Clinton did too.
I don't care where Trump puts his thing.
He's an adult, she's an adult and they had consensual sex and then she blackmailed him for money.

I though the Left was all about rights?

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: JoshuaCox

He claims it wasn’t breaking election law, but it obviously was..

How?

Well uhmm just because..

a reply to: Agit8dChop

He paid he off specifically on the eve of the election to keep it from getting out before hand..

That makes it an election law issue..


That said as I mentioned he wouldn’t be the first to get away with it.

a reply to: JinMI

Because if you pay someone off to keep quiet during an election. It breaks election law lol..

a reply to: Sookiechacha

He knew it was comming our anyway I bet..

It is too much money not to leave a paper trail.

a reply to: Asktheanimals

Umm..

With the exception of the later threat . We know trump did it..


His lawyer even admits to paying her off..

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: JinMI

Because if you pay someone off to keep quiet during an election. It breaks election law lol..

Statue?
By-law?
Code?

Something other than your word?

ETA:
Time of payoff?
Proof of payoff? (Not discounting Juliani persay)

a reply to: notsure1

Oh no not just because..


It is very specificly illegal to pay someone off to keep quiet during an election without reporting it as a campaign donation.


If not for the election he doesn’t pay her off..


That puts it in the purview of election law.


That said John Edwards did the same thing and was found not guilty.. so ...

a reply to: Asktheanimals

Um...

He cheated on his wife with a pornstar....


Ask your wife if she would find that a moral issue? Lol

a reply to: JinMI

I added it to the OP for you.


Good idea by the way.

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: JinMI

I added it to the OP for you.


Good idea by the way.

At least you made an attempt to come up with something but you failed anyway.
Do you have proof that Trump or his lawyer used campaign funds to pay this broad off?
Because that is the only way it would be illegal.
Trump has plenty of his own money to pay off a blackmailing whore.

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: JinMI

I added it to the OP for you.


Good idea by the way.

I don't see any connection to the law you posted and what is in play here so far.

Trump, nor his committee or any thereof were paid.

The allegation is that Cohen paid Daniels and the unknown is where those funds came from. When in time is in play and there are no details. The funds came from Cohen and were repaid by Trump (according to Juliani), none of which are campaign funds.

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: Agit8dChop

He paid he off specifically on the eve of the election to keep it from getting out before hand..

That makes it an election law issue..

No, that makes it a magic unicorn fact - ie: your mental gymnastics masquerading as an idea = 'breaking election laws'

a reply to: Sublimecraft

Actually it was the fact he paid her off through the campaign.. with a campaign official (Cohen) using a campaign email to set up the deal.

a reply to: JoshuaCox

No laws were violated. It was reimbursed.