It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Salander
If the Russian reports concerning missiles launched v. missiles that struck their target is true, then the attacks last week were a huge success for Russian and Syrian air defense systems.
I'm skeptical that NK's mind was changed by the US attacks. Likely they already knew the US bombs and kills as it pleases.
My bet is that SK somehow convinced NK to take the new position it has.
originally posted by: nightbringr
a reply to: nwtrucker
If anyone thinks Lil' Kim is going to give up his nukes, they are nuts.
originally posted by: nwtrucker
originally posted by: nightbringr
a reply to: nwtrucker
If anyone thinks Lil' Kim is going to give up his nukes, they are nuts.
If I had the choice between keeping my nukes and surviving in relative comfort, I'd probably give them up.
originally posted by: nightbringr
originally posted by: nwtrucker
originally posted by: nightbringr
a reply to: nwtrucker
If anyone thinks Lil' Kim is going to give up his nukes, they are nuts.
If I had the choice between keeping my nukes and surviving in relative comfort, I'd probably give them up.
Cant say I disagree with you, but nukes ensure his security.
The US won't attack of there is a chance of LA or Seattle being evaporated.
originally posted by: nightbringr
originally posted by: nwtrucker
originally posted by: nightbringr
a reply to: nwtrucker
If anyone thinks Lil' Kim is going to give up his nukes, they are nuts.
If I had the choice between keeping my nukes and surviving in relative comfort, I'd probably give them up.
Cant say I disagree with you, but nukes ensure his security.
The US won't attack of there is a chance of LA or Seattle being evaporated.
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: nightbringr
originally posted by: nwtrucker
originally posted by: nightbringr
a reply to: nwtrucker
If anyone thinks Lil' Kim is going to give up his nukes, they are nuts.
If I had the choice between keeping my nukes and surviving in relative comfort, I'd probably give them up.
Cant say I disagree with you, but nukes ensure his security.
The US won't attack of there is a chance of LA or Seattle being evaporated.
LOL! rep controlled Gov. sacrificing LA or Seattle would benefit R TURNOUt and give EC advantages.
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: nwtrucker
I don't see the two as connected , North Korea's change in stance started before the Syria strike and really nothing has changed.
Kim is desperate for the meeting with Trump to go ahead as it will play very well with his people so he is putting things on the table to ensure the meeting happens , Trump has already said if he thought Kim was insincere he wouldn't go so it's basically Kim uncovering what Trump wants and saying "look at the shiny " , Trump wants the shiny for obvious reasons.
The prospect of the meeting offers a ray of hope but it also is fraught with danger , it's a bold but potentially reckless move by Trump but we'll have to wait to see how it plays out to decide if we praise or damn him for it.
originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: projectvxn
Well, one side or the other is telling the truth. Pentagon, or Kremlin? I'll never know, but given the historical record of the former, I'm going with the latter.
In truth, it's likely that both sides are exaggerating.