My visit to The Skinwalker Ranch, 2018

a reply to: LungFuMoShi

absolutely!! Ready to soak up any interesting things that may have happened or that you oberved during you stay, like a SPONGE!

originally posted by: KellyPrettyBear
a reply to: fleabit

*EVERYTHING* is marketing.

So long as there is no deception, I don't see a problem.

Kev

That is the crux of the issue. So long as there is no deception then there is absolutely no problem. Let's make no mistake that the ranch has been purchased as an outlet for 'entertainment' purposes. Which includes creation of multimedia content.

RANCH

Providing recreation facilities; Arranging and conducting special events for social entertainment purposes; Entertainment services, namely, storytelling; Publishing of printed matter; Publishing of electronic publications; Entertainment services, namely, creation, development, production, and distribution of multimedia content, internet content, motion pictures, and television shows

Link : trademarks.justia.com...

It may not be a 'Paranormal Theme Park' in the making but the new owners must intend to make more out of it than just a couple of documentaries and books. So we might see guided tours' and other functions to exploit the full potential of their purchase.

Again it's all fine as long as there is no deception involved.

a reply to: mirageman

480 acres couldn't have been cheap!

Unless "haunted ranches" sell for pennies on the dollar!

Most people want to have their cake and to eat it too..

Even if the new owners are really big paranormal buffs and want to do research,
i'd imagine as normal human beings, they would want the ranch to pay for it's
purchase price and ongoing research / staffing if possible.

That might be challenging..

I wish them the best.

Kev

a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

If the place is indeed as as creepy as advertised a man of means could wire most of those Acres with wide lens cameras motion detectors in all sorts of gizmos and capture the high strangeness.
Edit in that guy from Ancient Aliens.
...
Profit?

a reply to: dashen

I'd surmise that 95%+ of any 'activity' would be invisible to the normal
human eye, just like it presumably is anywhere else that it manifests.

It will be difficult to pump this up / market it / to make $$ without
any dishonesty whatsoever.

I'm hoping that the ethical standard is very high and stays that way.

Kev

originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

If the place is indeed as as creepy as advertised a man of means could wire most of those Acres with wide lens cameras motion detectors in all sorts of gizmos and capture the high strangeness.
Edit in that guy from Ancient Aliens.
...
Profit?

The NIDS attempt to gather evidence failed miserably. No amount of tech is going to help advance the research there. Three cameras were disabled right under that team's noses. A camera pointed at those three cameras caught nothing.

NOTHING.

originally posted by: Springer
Just to quash any B.S. spewed by the jealous and/or haters, NO, I won't be benefiting financially from the film

...okay. Why are you always on the defense? You can relax sometimes, you know. Break out your Makers Mark, and throw a couple back. lol

Interestingly Springer said he didn't experience anything, which leaves open the door to did anyone else during that visit?
Hopefully we won't have to wait for the documentary?

a reply to: mirageman

I reckon they will do limited hangouts there in the same vein as CSETI ranch and that sort of thing. They will have people there but limited numbers from within the "community" rather than fair rides and "hotdog" stands

Really looking forward to jeremys film and your further posts Springer

Sorry if this has been asked already, but does your doc have anything to do with the recent post about the ranch’s new owners and their entertainment trademarks(?) associated with the ranch and linked in the post?

originally posted by: Springer
a reply to: ignorant_ape

Right now the only people I can reveal are George Knapp, Jeremy Corbell, and myself. ;-)

Just for fun, I'll guess who else may be involved and see if I'm right when the movie comes out.

Jacque Vallee

Colm Kelleher

Bob BIgelow? (doubtful)

Ryan Burns

Thomas Winterton

John Alexander

Just throwing a few names out there to see if any stick.

Nothing at skin walker ranch will ever be caught on film that's worth capturing.

These things/entities can't be filmed with our cameras they are a manifestation of our own consciousness which is not actually happening in the 3d world , hence why nothing ever gets filmed cause it's not really there like a mirage in a desert or an halcunation on '___' it's all very much in your head.

Not wishing to show "bad manners", but the idea of watching a documentary about nothing seems pretty lame. Are we supposed to get "creeped out" by the vibes or just feel a sense of "pride" about someone dropping names?

originally posted by: shambles84
Nothing at skin walker ranch will ever be caught on film that's worth capturing.

These things/entities can't be filmed with our cameras they are a manifestation of our own consciousness which is not actually happening in the 3d world , hence why nothing ever gets filmed cause it's not really there like a mirage in a desert or an halcunation on '___' it's all very much in your head.

An uninformed opinion.

originally posted by: KeithCooper
Not wishing to show "bad manners", but the idea of watching a documentary about nothing seems pretty lame. Are we supposed to get "creeped out" by the vibes or just feel a sense of "pride" about someone dropping names?

The Skinwalker Ranch has a fascinating and bizarre history. Personally, I look forward to seeing this documentary knowing what I do about the locale.

This is not an endorsement. I'm only expressing interest in what will, and will not, be shown.

wow so it happened after all
we are proud of you

originally posted by: KeithCooper
Not wishing to show "bad manners", but the idea of watching a documentary about nothing seems pretty lame. Are we supposed to get "creeped out" by the vibes or just feel a sense of "pride" about someone dropping names?

You should try reading the books......

And its not HIS documentary its jeremy kenyon lockyer corbell's documentary.

He also did "Patient 17" you should check it out its really really well done.

a reply to: Springer

*peeks into ATS*

This looks great, Springer! Can’t wait to see it.

As to “experiencing” things, I find “they” (it?) tend(s) to like to sneak up on you when you’re not looking.

That’s been a general rule in my limited observations. I’m no expert, though!

*shrugs*

I will be lurking around here to see what else you post about it - always good to get an exclusive report.

Does this relate at all to the To the Stars Academy folks in some way, perhaps tangentially, as a line of investigation? I know the folks doing the film aren’t the same, but George Knapp and Robert Bigelow connect to both in some way. Just curious!



PS: Skinwalker Ranch is on the list of “major mysteries” in my book. I don’t care if the current owners have “entertainment liscences” or whatever, because, as you mentioned, that covers a wide range of activities including the film you are in. I can’t wait to see the movie!!

AB

Very cool!

As a lover of reading others paranormal experiences, I can't wait to see what all comes out in the film.

Other shows/documentaries I've watched about the ranch are right up there with the weirdest stories I've ever heard, and I've heard a lot!!

Congratulations on getting to go there. Too bad you didn't experience anything more than "feelings". I always love it when skeptics get a good healthy dose of the paranormal.

Looking forward to more on this thread.