It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Parsing what that means isn’t easy, but it does lead to one clear, if counterintuitive, conclusion, the team argues: “Alternatives to dark matter have trouble with this object,” van Dokkum said.
Theories like modified Newtonian dynamics and a new idea called emergent gravity propose that there is no dark matter. Instead of galaxies being filled with mysterious invisible stuff, these theories postulate, gravity works differently than expected on galactic scales, in a way that only mimics the presence of dark matter. But if that’s true, van Dokkum explained, then every galaxy should obey these different laws of gravity and look as if it contains dark matter, with no exceptions.
Theories that challenge dark matter’s existence will need to explain away the new claim about galaxy NGC 1052–DF2 to survive.
originally posted by: projectvxn
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
A theorized substance we can't actually directly touch or study up close is acting like we don't expect.
Mind blown.
Except we can measure the effects of gravity produced by dark matter.
is acting like we don't expect.
originally posted by: projectvxn
This is what is abnormal. It isn't that dark matter itself is doing anything, but that it isn't there to begin with.
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
originally posted by: projectvxn
This is what is abnormal. It isn't that dark matter itself is doing anything, but that it isn't there to begin with.
And that is what is abnormal about it, according to people who claim to be experts on the subject: "this invisible, mysterious substance is the most dominant aspect of any galaxy."
Sheesh.