It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Southern Guardian
Your oily defence of a massive multi-national corporation’s censoring of someone’s free speech proves none of this is about principle, and we can put free speech in the growing pile of things you do not believe in.
I'm sure you've heard the saying "your rights end where the rights of others begin", correct?
Apparently you do not believe in private property rights, because if you did, you would not have said such a thing.
Your oily defence of a massive multi-national corporation’s censoring of someone’s free speech proves none of this is about principle, and we can put free speech in the growing pile of things you do not believe in.
Ahh, I see.
You're one of those folks that thinks repeating something over and over makes it true.
No wonder propaganda works so well. People even use the techniques on themselves.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Southern Guardian
Your oily defence of a massive multi-national corporation’s censoring of someone’s free speech proves none of this is about principle, and we can put free speech in the growing pile of things you do not believe in.
I'm sure you've heard the saying "your rights end where the rights of others begin", correct?
Apparently you do not believe in private property rights, because if you did, you would not have said such a thing.
Your oily defence of a massive multi-national corporation’s censoring of someone’s free speech proves none of this is about principle, and we can put free speech in the growing pile of things you do not believe in.
Ahh, I see.
You're one of those folks that thinks repeating something over and over makes it true.
No wonder propaganda works so well. People even use the techniques on themselves.
No, I just treat all would-be censors the same.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
You make it sound like you believe that the judge made the wrong call in this case. In which case, yes you are advocating for the government to strip YouTube of their 1st Amendment rights.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
You make it sound like you believe that the judge made the wrong call in this case. In which case, yes you are advocating for the government to strip YouTube of their 1st Amendment rights.
No, you make it sound like I believe that. I never mentioned a judge, the government, nor the first amendment.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Southern Guardian
Your oily defence of a massive multi-national corporation’s censoring of someone’s free speech proves none of this is about principle, and we can put free speech in the growing pile of things you do not believe in.
I'm sure you've heard the saying "your rights end where the rights of others begin", correct?
Apparently you do not believe in private property rights, because if you did, you would not have said such a thing.
Your oily defence of a massive multi-national corporation’s censoring of someone’s free speech proves none of this is about principle, and we can put free speech in the growing pile of things you do not believe in.
Ahh, I see.
You're one of those folks that thinks repeating something over and over makes it true.
No wonder propaganda works so well. People even use the techniques on themselves.
No, I just treat all would-be censors the same.
So those that exercise their rights are considered censors. Ok.
If only you would treat/respect all rights the same.
People such as yourself and the reason we have rights to begin with.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
I don't see how you can consider what YouTube is doing censorship. As far as I'm aware, every video or channel that has be removed did violate the YouTube T&Cs. These people agreed to those rules when they made their channel. So no, they are not being censored.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Xcalibur254
LesMis thinks that you should be able to say anything whenever or whereever you want customs, T&C's, EULAs, etc be damned. If you want to yell fire in a crowded theater that is A-Ok with him. Saying you aren't allowed to do that is censorship to him and infringing on that person's free speech.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
And it's videos were not removed.