It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Google has won the dismissal of a lawsuit in California accusing YouTube of censoring conservative content.
In a decision late Monday, U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh said a nonprofit run by conservative radio talk show host Dennis Prager failed to show that YouTube infringed its free speech rights by placing age restrictions on its content.
The plaintiff, Prager University, said YouTube’s “animus” toward its “political identity and viewpoint” led it to curb access to videos on such topics as abortion, gun rights, Islam and terrorism, despite its stated promise of neutrality.
But the judge said Google and YouTube, both units of Mountain View, California-based Alphabet Inc, did not qualify as “state actors” subject to the First Amendment by creating a “public forum” for speech.
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: Southern Guardian
Obviously Google and YouTube do censor conservatives, however, I can't see how it would be illegal for a corporation to set its own policies. While they may be against free speech they aren't required to allow it like the actual Government.
originally posted by: Southern Guardian
....But the judge said Google and YouTube, both units of Mountain View, California-based Alphabet Inc, did not qualify as “state actors” ...
ehhhh...
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: Southern Guardian
Yea, because the “left wing bias” to the media is ridiculous..
They just won’t lie for conservatives.. that doesn’t make them biased..
originally posted by: ErrorErrorError
Find other companies instead of whining all the time. No one is forcing you to use Google and YouTube
originally posted by: NobodiesNormal
a reply to: odzeandennz
except you tube has censored alex jones videos multiple times, but i guess since they havnt outright removed his channel yet that means his speech isnt infringed?
screwed up logic.
originally posted by: NobodiesNormal
originally posted by: Southern Guardian
....But the judge said Google and YouTube, both units of Mountain View, California-based Alphabet Inc, did not qualify as “state actors” ...
when you are a monopoly you are a state actor. that is unavoidable. they just get to pretend they arent a state actor cause the gov cant define or prove they are a monopoly.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Southern Guardian
Your oily defence of a massive multi-national corporation’s censoring of someone’s free speech proves none of this is about principle, and we can put free speech in the growing pile of things you do not believe in.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Southern Guardian
Your oily defence of a massive multi-national corporation’s censoring of someone’s free speech proves none of this is about principle, and we can put free speech in the growing pile of things you do not believe in.
I'm sure you've heard the saying "your rights end where the rights of others begin", correct?
Apparently you do not believe in private property rights, because if you did, you would not have said such a thing.
Your oily defence of a massive multi-national corporation’s censoring of someone’s free speech proves none of this is about principle, and we can put free speech in the growing pile of things you do not believe in.