Stormy Daniels’ ‘Super’ Dilated Pupils Spark Accusations She Was High

Well now if she was to be pulled over like that then probable cause would definitely exist and likely leed to arrest.

Unless now you all will claim she is above the laws.

a reply to: TinySickTears

Well, we had to try to find something interesting about it, you see.

All of this married men having a one night stand stuff was only shocking way back when Clinton did it, and at that point in time, the media convinced all of us it was just sex.

So if it's just sex, there must be something interesting to all this that merits this interview?

So ... dialated pupils, right?

originally posted by: howtonhawky
Well now if she was to be pulled over like that then probable cause would definitely exist and likely leed to arrest.

Unless now you all will claim she is above the laws.

you dont know that at all

why are you talking out of your ass?

you see a zoomed in screen shot of a lady and by that you know if pulled over it would likely lead to arrest

jesus christ some people are warped

hahahahahhaha

Who cares? I say we go back to the Q thread and worry about real facts. The president cheated on his wife with a porn star right after their son was born? Pfffft, there are secret messages and codes to decipher, they'll actually lead to something unlike this.

a reply to: ketsuko

i was not shocked that bill #ed around and i am not shocked that the donald did either

the interesting thing to me at least is where did the 130k come from and why did it come 11 days before the election?

right when # was getting down to the wire and he was in the news for his escapades

was that contribution made to silence her in an effort to sway the election?

you know. things like that

how would it sway the election? well a lot of the super moral types, many on here ay not have voted for him had that come out.
we just cant know


oh but i forgot. the lawyer used 130k of his own cash cause thats what lawyers do


people are just trying to smear this woman

a reply to: TinySickTears

you wish i was making it up

cops do consider such probable cause every day

now why did no one else in the room have the same problem as her?

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: howtonhawky

*shrugs*


So she was high.


It doesn't change anything.

In my opinion.

No, I'm

a reply to: TinySickTears

No. I honestly don't care.

I'm tired of the left bringing the inevitable skeleton out of the closet at the 11th hour every single time and expecting us to fall on our swords and not vote or vote for them.

No way I was letting Clinton in office over sex.

originally posted by: amazing
She didn't seem wasted when she was talking or act like she was super coked out or tweaking.

I'm going to say it was probably something else.

So you don't know anything about coke huh?

originally posted by: amazing
She didn't seem wasted when she was talking or act like she was super coked out or tweaking.

I'm going to say it was probably something else.

How do people who just did a line of coke act? I never did it, so haven't a clue, but those I have seen, act a bit cocky, perhaps very sure of themselves, but not loopy or sloppy.

But regardless, her habit, or lack thereof, is just as important as the entire story. (IMHO, about zero "F's" given either way)

a reply to: network dude

well she is an ole pro at many things

other than the eyes many show no signs after yrs of use

originally posted by: howtonhawky
a reply to: TinySickTears

you wish i was making it up

cops do consider such probable cause every day

now why did no one else in the room have the same problem as her?

i am not talking about the PC thing cause i dont know for sure

you are 100% talking out of your ass when you say it would likely lead to arrest.
could it? maybe

or she could be on medication and doing not a thing wrong

who else in the room are you talking about?
the only other person in the room that was interviewing her??

i dont know. do you have a zoomed in shot of his pupils so we can be sure?

youre hilarious

originally posted by: bender151

originally posted by: amazing
She didn't seem wasted when she was talking or act like she was super coked out or tweaking.

I'm going to say it was probably something else.

So you don't know anything about coke huh?

I do. Apparently you don't? LOL See two can play that game. She really didn't seem like she was on coke to me, but of course that's just my opinion. I could be wrong. You're one of those guys that thinks he knows everything.

a reply to: TinySickTears

You've going the LEGAL buzz line. That's compassionate.

originally posted by: TinySickTears
a reply to: ketsuko

i was not shocked that bill #ed around and i am not shocked that the donald did either

the interesting thing to me at least is where did the 130k come from and why did it come 11 days before the election?

right when # was getting down to the wire and he was in the news for his escapades

was that contribution made to silence her in an effort to sway the election?

you know. things like that

how would it sway the election? well a lot of the super moral types, many on here ay not have voted for him had that come out.
we just cant know


oh but i forgot. the lawyer used 130k of his own cash cause thats what lawyers do

people are just trying to smear this woman

any idiot can tell that Yes, Trump porker her, and Yes, his attorney paid her to shut up, due to the election. But the even bigger question is why does it matter? Is flucking a whore a decade ago somehow an impeachable offence? Does it have an effect over what decisions are made today?

She took the money, she signed the agreement. now she broke her end of the contract. She is free to do that, but Trump is also now free to sue her. I think that will end up being the big story here. 'Stormy Daniels goes bankrupt over her attempt to exploit the President'.

a reply to: amazing

she sure did not seem like a person that was in the midst of a run with the devils dandruff to me.

so the game apparently is defend the donald about everything and smear anyone opposite him for everything

i got it

originally posted by: howtonhawky
Well now if she was to be pulled over like that then probable cause would definitely exist and likely leed to arrest.

IF(I hate it when we go there) she drove through the studio wall to do the interview this premise would have merit. She was probably limo'd anyway.

youtu.be...

originally posted by: network dude

any idiot can tell that Yes, Trump porker her, and Yes, his attorney paid her to shut up, due to the election. But the even bigger question is why does it matter? Is flucking a whore a decade ago somehow an impeachable offence? Does it have an effect over what decisions are made today?

.

does it matter he banged her? no
is banging her an impeachable offense? no

about the effect?

as i said

its not about the bone down. its about the money
who paid it?
why did they pay it?
why was it paid so close to the election?

i already said as much. you quoted it

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Jefferton

Eye surgeries are actually the one specific professional medical use for the substance.

It was listed on my hospital bill after a sinus polypectomy too. I like to joke that maybe it was for the Dr.!

Yeah, she looks wasted on something no doubt.