Trump threatens to veto omnibus bill because it does not address DACA recipients

wp

President Trump said he might veto the sweeping $1.3 trillion spending bill passed early Friday — a move that likely would lead to a government shutdown — because it does nothing to address the fate of young undocumented immigrants and does not fully fund his border wall.

Looks like they slammed the gavel and all went to the lacassa and Trump will use his veto power to shut down the gov.

So do you think he will veto of not?

If so what will be the repercussions?

wsj

cnbc

originally posted by: howtonhawky
wp

President Trump said he might veto the sweeping $1.3 trillion spending bill passed early Friday — a move that likely would lead to a government shutdown — because it does nothing to address the fate of young undocumented immigrants and does not fully fund his border wall.

Looks like they slammed the gavel and all went to the lacassa and Trump will use his veto power to shut down the gov.

So do you think he will veto of not?

If so what will be the repercussions?

Another source for those that also don't pay to view MSM sites.

CNBC

So which do you think the real reason is? Not dealing with DACA or not funding The Great Wall of Donald?

originally posted by: jtma508
So which do you think the real reason is? Not dealing with DACA or not funding The Great Wall of Donald?

Both

a reply to: Middleoftheroad

No the link i gave is not a paysite.

a reply to: jtma508

according to Trump it is both.

originally posted by: howtonhawky
a reply to: Middleoftheroad

No the link i gave is not a paysite.

I have to pay to see it, but I believe they let you get 10 free views before they start charging.

a reply to: Middleoftheroad

k thanks

are you sure they just do not like you personally?jk

Poor Donald doesn't understand that the DACA kids were politically expedient at the time, but their usefulness is over.

originally posted by: network dude
Poor Donald doesn't understand that the DACA kids were politically expedient at the time, but their usefulness is over.

After they protested and yelled at Nancy Pelosi for using them as political pawns, I bet the Dems are afraid of how they would vote now.

originally posted by: howtonhawky
a reply to: Middleoftheroad

k thanks

are you sure they just do not like you personally?jk

Haha, that might be it.

Veto it. A raise for those bastards in office....I do NOT think so. His DACA jab is perfect. Another spear in the side of the establishment.

originally posted by: network dude
Poor Donald doesn't understand that the DACA kids were politically expedient at the time, but their usefulness is over.

it is a meaningless comment yet the peeps dig yo shat

what gives?

daca kids are the only tool left to stop omnibus

$1.3TRILLION spending bill, obsessed with stoking immigrants... does this mean Trump is a "Liberal" now?

He should just get Mexico to aprove the bill.

ya, whoever believes that is an idiot, which trump expects..

the real reason he might veto -

the spending bill includes new measure to punish Russia.

can't have that!

originally posted by: howtonhawky

originally posted by: network dude
Poor Donald doesn't understand that the DACA kids were politically expedient at the time, but their usefulness is over.

it is a meaningless comment yet the peeps dig yo shat

what gives?

daca kids are the only tool left to stop omnibus

Trump made the mistake of thinking the kids actually mattered and wanted them taken care of, like he said before. But my joking response makes the insinuation that politicians only care about people when they can use them for their benefit. Trump isn't a "politician" and just doesn't understand that way of thinking.

originally posted by: knoxie
ya, whoever believes that is an idiot, which trump expects..

the real reason he might veto -

the spending bill includes new measure to punish Russia.

can't have that!

false to some extent

all the hype bout punishing russia is just banning those 13 that meuller called out and a few financial institutions

that is all the sanctions i have seen but msm played it up every way they could

no real sanctions on russia but others may chime in and correct me.

msm hyperbole

He should not sign it because no one in Congress who voted for it actually read the whole thing. Rand Paul was on one of the talking heads show last night. Said bill was 2200+ pages (he gave exact number) and they had just gotten it late the night before. He read all day Thursday and only got through 600 pages and was going back (8pm) to try and read more before vote. He did say the bill authorized border security $$ for other countries in other parts of the world, which he chuckled about.

Whole swamp needs to go...

oh no another shutdown boo hoo. military still gets paid,SS still cuts checks. nothing really changes.