It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: ignorant_ape
Fact= A statement which is true.
It is at the core, why? Several possibilities...
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: anonentity
Simple question...WHY?
What purpose would this grand conspiracy serve? That MT and NASA officials really didn't screw the pooch by green-lighting the launch on that fateful day after all???
I'm confused.
/sarcasm
originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: All Seeing Eye
Here we have some facts, which NASA said they died instantly, when they were alive , and the crew cabin was intact after the explosion
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
It is at the core, why? Several possibilities...
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: anonentity
Simple question...WHY?
What purpose would this grand conspiracy serve? That MT and NASA officials really didn't screw the pooch by green-lighting the launch on that fateful day after all???
I'm confused.
/sarcasm
1. The Crew were in fact on the shuttle, and the escape pod did work. 1 fatality.
2. It was a classified unmanned mission that needed a cover story, and cover people. No one was on the shuttle.
3. It was intended to explode. Insurance, or extra funding required.
4. It was destroyed by forces unknown who made a previous warning. It was a test flight.
5. Possibly a multiple causation of the above.
It is "rumored" that NASA was warned not to come back to the moon. Maybe there was more to the warning, and more to the Challenger mission 10.
To settle it, you need more testimony from people who might have handled the bodies who are willing to make a statement. Other Family members, spouses, etc.