NASA we have a problem?

In 1986 the Challenger exploded after take off, seven crew members were killed. But we have an amazing coincidence, six of these crewmembers seem to be happy and living well thirty odd years later. Whattttt? the odds of six lookalikes some having the same names, seems like some incredible black joke but the odds mathematically of this occurrence, is about the same as going to bed on Earth and waking up on Mars.
If you thought 9/11 was fishy take a look at this.

looks like flat earth propaganda to me

originally posted by: humanoidlord
looks like flat earth propaganda to me

This video might be (I have not seen it yet), but this hoax-theory actually predate the current flat earth craze. IIRC I heard abut it on CC some 10 years ago.

Edit: This video is joke though. Compared to this flat earthers have pretty solid arguments.

Cuz that's what it is, dude.

I can't keep from at least considering the possibility that there are 5 stoners hitting this MASSIVE bong in a basement in Fort Collins, Colorado that started all this stuff just so they could see how many card carrying idiots they could get to push it.

a reply to: anonentity

"Houston we have a problem" is a Mandela Effect that was proven to have flipped-flipped - should convince the hardest skeptic (but won't)..

And there was someone on here that said that they remembered the Challenger tragedy happening many years later.

..a two-fer!

We can rely on government agencies to always tell us the truth.

originally posted by: olaru12
We can rely on government agencies to always tell us the truth.

Thank you!
It really grinds my garbanzo beans when people try to dis the official government stories.
It's like, oh man, do you even political science bro?

a reply to: anonentity

Buzz punching that smug POS is the only redeeming quality of this garbage video.

"you can tell it is real because it looks so fake" - Elon Musk - shortly after it dawned on him that he had been co-opted and duped by the government. He knew it was a bust but the government was "ready" with a video anyways.

Meanwhile, on Flat Earth. "Wow, isn't it amaaaazing dude? It's going to Mars man!"

Reptilian eye roll

Laughter

I always love stuff like this. On the one hand we're supposed to believe that NASA is some all powerful agency that was capable of faking the moon landings and convincing people we can get to space, and capable of suppressing all kinds of information.

Then at the same time, this incredibly competent agency, is so incompetent and stupid that, after lying about the Challenger astronauts dying, and putting their faces everywhere, they turn around and let them go out and whatever they want, without even changing their names, or having plastic surgery.

a reply to: anonentity

Man, i can't count the number of times a friend or family member has found my dopplegangers.

The human genome is rather narrow, and it's quite common to find someone who looks near identical to you.

Considering that there are 7 billion plus humans alive, it's quite easy to see that certain genetic mutations will duplicate themselves in completely different areas of the world.

No conspiracy here.

a reply to: anonentity

For consideration: Reincarnation is real. Noone understands the timeline of it though.

a reply to: anonentity

FFS - just stop and THINK for one second

a reply to: ooder57


You really have to think, if all the defining moments in history that have caused a major policy change to occur, had to have a false flag , to be able to bring the legislation in. Then its the opinion of the public which has to be changed first then the legislation is virtually automatic. Most of these events don't require anything like a coup de tat , or a 9/11 all that's require is a dumbed down public. Which is now so dumb as to barely question what has been done to them. Like having to be felt up by some security agent when boarding a domestic flight etc. Having all your domestic appliances and personal telephone being able to be used to check up on you and your immediate surroundings, having every thing you buy being accessible by the security agencies that follow your movements by CC TV. If we are not being played on some Machiavellian level, and all the security responses have failed to jail one 9/11 perpetrator. Then the present state of affairs as it exists with the "Mocking bird media", where information can no longer be assumed to be free and unbiased. What would a questioning mind assume.? The answer is that it cant assume anything.
And that's why people have gone to a lot of time and trouble , to examine the holes in the official version of world events. If the official version was a true and honest account they would find no holes.

a reply to: anonentity

Bull. No major event in history has ever made 100% sense to 100% of the people. You can always find holes, especially if you start with "the government always lies so there's got to be something wrong here".

At first I was really skeptical and was going to post a witty comment of ignorance...

I decided to watch the video first, and I'm glad I did. There seems to be some good research and back checking of these "accusations".

There is something to it. Near the end of the video there is a portion where a reporter takes a Bible to the astronauts who claimed to walk on the moon.
The reporter asks them to put there hand on the Bible and swear they walked the moon.

Every astronaut replied in anger, aggression, cussing, and buzz Aldrin punched the reporter in the face. Ed Mitchell "humped" the reporter in the butt as he was bent over grabbing his books/equipment.

On a psychological level, and a behavior one.. these are actions and responses from liars or people who have something to hide.

Star and flag, you left me curious.

a reply to: Zaphod58


I am not pushing any agenda, that defies logic or reason. If the official spin says that it went down "This way" this is really a top government official telling an aid in the security service to make sure their are no problems to answer when the official version comes out. The security agent will be under pressure to do this or that, but he can't cover every minute detail. But we are not dealing with minute detail we are dealing with glaring holes in the narrative, which would only be allowed to see the light of day, if the said perpetrators considered the duped so stupid that they wouldn't notice! in most cases they would be right.
Just for instance during the hijacked planes on 9/11 their was no way a cell phone at that stage of technology, during the hijacking would reach a cell phone tower, and do the handover to the next tower at 500 miles an hour. Here is another example of someone making glaring boo boo. Allowing the BBC to go to air about the tower collapse a half hour before it happened was another one.
The fact is we in the west are under individual tighter security surveillance , than the STAZI subjected its citizens to during the reign of the GDR. Why?..... I think that when they do Russia they want to round up people who might be less than sympathetic to the war...just a personal opinion.

a reply to: Elementalist

Calling Bart Sibrel a reporter is like calling a dog a person. He's known for stalking astronauts, lying about his credentials to get access to them, and in that clip, ambushing Buzz Aldrin while he was at lunch with his niece, and not letting them leave the area. They react with anger because he's been pulling the same stunts for years. How would you feel if someone had been doing that to you for years?

a reply to: Zaphod58

They react with anger because he's been pulling the same stunts for years. How would you feel if someone had been doing that to you for years?

Me? I would have just put my hand on the book, and told the truth. Pretty simple, eah? No emotions necessary!

originally posted by: Elementalist


There is something to it. Near the end of the video there is a portion where a reporter takes a Bible to the astronauts who claimed to walk on the moon.
The reporter asks them to put there hand on the Bible and swear they walked the moon.

Every astronaut replied in anger, aggression, cussing, and buzz Aldrin punched the reporter in the face. Ed Mitchell "humped" the reporter in the butt as he was bent over grabbing his books/equipment.

Whatever is presented in the video (and I am refusing to watch it because I find this claim extremely disrespectful and offensive), convicted violent criminal Sibrel did not experience anger and aggression from every astronaut he approached. A number of them did swear on the bible. He was punched and kicked, deservedly, for stalking Aldrin all day until he snapped, and for getting into Mitchell's house under false pretenses - he lied about why he was there. Neil Armstrong had to get the police involved when Sibrel terrorised his wife. Sibrel is dishonest in every way.

On a psychological level, and a behavior one.. these are actions and responses from liars or people who have something to hide.

No, these are the reactions and responses of people who have been lied to, stalked and had their privacy invaded by someone who abused them.

If people are so convinced this garbage is true, it isn't hard to track down the families of the people who died and ask them what they think about it. Off you go. Let us know how you get on.