It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Starhooker
a reply to: soberbacchus
Teachers don't kill sick puppies, turtles do
originally posted by: nightbringr
originally posted by: Vroomfondel
Equating dogs to rats is a false narrative.
Dogs have a higher sensibility. They have genuine emotions. They are intelligent. They are loyal. And, domesticated, dependent on us.
As someone who has owned both dogs AND mice, I can assure you that you are wrong. Your limited perspective and unwillingness to see animals that aren't 'cute' as intelligent or having feelings and emotions is quite simply narrow minded.
Simply because a mouse cannot emote to you in the way a dog can does not make it worthy of the abuse you deem unfit for a dog. No, it will not play fetch with you, want you to scratch it behind the ears. But saying it deserves less than a dog? That is your emotions speaking. Peoples inability to see that all life deserves respect, not simply the cute and cuddly is what the problem is here.
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: ToneDeaf
What if the dog was already dead and it died totally unconnected to the feeding???
The fact the articles keep adding “we don’t know if the puppy was alive or not”.. which if you ask me almost certainly means the dog was already dead.
originally posted by: silo13
The dog was sick. In 'the wild' it would have succumbed to a predator.
originally posted by: silo13
a reply to: the owlbear
Point is - I agree a 'puppy' was not the wisest choice.
The puppy was sick.
And, we feed tiny baby rats to spiders and live healthy mice and rats to snakes every day - in science class.
So what are you upset about?
The fact it's a puppy?
Or kids were exposed to the truth?
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Okay, WHAT IF he had used a "wolf" pup... would it be okay then???