-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART 4

a reply to: FauxMulder

Stargates.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Q has hinted at the CIAs games.

They’ve been beaten to death here but I’m always up for a little dip into the MocKingbird psyop.

What’s more alarming? That the Parkland shooting was a staged event to cover other staged events? Or that no one is talking about the off duty SWAT guys who are ruining things for the clowns in Parkland?

Two by two

a reply to: Wookiep



Indeed, those connections are without question at this point. I tend to run skeptical with the understanding that if it is true then my thoughts and actions contribute to the end result therefore I'd prefer to be part of the positive force, the drive or inertia pushing truth and awakening forward.

If it all flops and blows up in our face, well, it's not the first time. It's the failures in life that we truly grow and learn from.

a reply to: tigertatzen

My father was an actuary and reviewed a lot of life insurance claims.
I remember him talking about a big payout for some guy that drove a Jeep through a plate glass window.
According to the Coroners report, the driver was stoned and listening to the band Rush at the time.
Of course dear old Dad didn't believe in secret societies either.

a reply to: Greenanon

I always try to go to the disease itself, rather than it's symptoms.

On this issue, no matter which particular event (waterfall) we can chase, which with these shootings come aplenty, it's the Mass Shooter Contagion Effect, which the MSM & politicians are entirely responsible for,that is scientifically proven to drive a serious percentage, if not all of the shootings, yet it isn't discussed?!?!?! WTF

I'm stuck using the cell phone still, otherwise I'd add the links for these terms as I go, but this is the q thread so surely nobody here in minds having to do the copy-paste lol...

The Mass Shooter Contagion Effect is essentially the combination of the Emotional Contagion Effect plus Copycat Effect.

And it has been statistically proven to be a primary motivating cause behind the mass shooting phenomenon, which is USA Exclusive, and doesn't happen just because of guns exist or anything else the MSM chases. Yet swear I've yet to see anyone else around here or in similar 'scene' type spots / sources ever mention, meaning quite frankly I'm sick of it thus being 'my responsibility' to constantly harp (pester everyone) about it.

When the MSM wants us to focus on certain realms of debate on any topic, and that's essentially all we do, they win.

And just looking for conspiracies within the conspiracies, well quite frankly half if not most of the time it tends to be together with nutter stuff.

This Effect here, it's REAL, it's being ignored, it's over arching related to essentially every shooting, and the MSM keep playing US like fiddles to the tunes of children dying so they can worker at reducing our gun rights.

What Trump's this????

The perfect crime:
The Agenda (1) boost ratings. (2) attack gun rights.
(A) inspire kids etc to commit mass murderers. (B) cover up the blood on 'our' [the MSM's] hands by framing the national debate around the guns themselves, and other road to nowhere on the surface whatever "cause" issues, but never the Mass Shooter Contagion Effect.

Fake news!

UPDATE TO spreadsheet and MAGIC SQUARE TOOL - Unanswered Q V1.7 including MAGIC SQUARE tool V2

This can also be found under QLinks on QWiki.


The MAGIC SQUARE tool now includes:
1) The Florida/Guccifer method,
2) The COVFEFE method,
above described at Reddit
3) Any size square from 1x1 up to 20x20,
4) Ability to MIRROR, FLIP or BOTH the square,
5) Use the square on EITHER a Q Post, OR a POTUS Tweet,
6) easier-to-the-eye colouring,
7) All Square contents and manipulation are automated!

I need to update base data in the sheet with latest 100 posts.

As the OP, DASHEN has asked, please bring interesting results to the thread but don't post the MAGIC SQUARES so that we don't unnecessarily flood the thread. (Unless required to answer challenge to the results).

Thanks to members who've linked me to chan and reddit descriptions of methods.

originally posted by: ketsuko
I don't know. You tell us. That's what we're thinking about.

i don't know either. again, that's why i asked.

although, thank you for giving me a response besides 'you can't ask questions until you've read all 950 pages of threads we've created so far.'

makes a nice change

a reply to: ketsuko

You might call it a neverending doom porn thread in a way.

I thought Q was referred to as hope porn?



a reply to: MountainLaurel

You're quite welcome!

I know exactly what you mean in your post too, I'm older than the Internet and can remember a time when there was such a thing as the end of the broadcast day and have used a card catalogue. I am amazed at the change that has taken place in awareness (or lack thereof) considering how much information we now have at our fingertips.

People on the whole don't seem to be much more aware than they were in the past, the same percentages of people just have life pass them by and only get their information from approved sources. They actually get mad when you try and show them that what they've thought was the truth for so long is really just cleverly constructed phantasms; we know it as cognitive dissonance.

The information age hasn't changed much in that regards, the only thing it has done is it has allowed those of us who have been able to see behind the curtain since before most were even aware that there was a curtain behind which to peer to gather together in places like this and discuss among ourselves topics which require background in order to fully comprehend.

originally posted by: Rosinitiate
a reply to: MountainLaurel

Probably wouldn't be so bad if the technology was designed to be weaponized against us.

Technology has not been weaponized against anyone. We live in the 140 character world today where people are simply too lazy to fact check or perform due diligence. They parrot the latest Tweet, MSM headline, etc. as unsubstantiated fact.

Most importantly no one applies basic critical thinking with regards to information. They don't consider the source, motives, intended ripple effect, etc. People have allowed technology to make them incredibly stupid.

a reply to: fiverx313

Most of the question you ask contain a demand we explain it to you where an explanation requires us to backtrack over the previous three threads. That's why you get told what you get told.

If you want that explanation, go through those threads. For someone to try to type you an explanation would require them to do as much and create some kind of bizarre shorthand. Read just Dashen's indices alone for an idea.

If a summary is what you want, then that legwork is all on you.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Hope/doom ... it depends on your private suspicions about where all this will end up doesn't it.

originally posted by: Perfectenemy

First thing that popped in my head is Keep your Spirit but it sounds too easy and obvious. For some strange reason the ....... part reminds me of putting your signature there. Just a thought might be nothing though. I tend to take the most complex route. I'm wired that way.

Keep your eyes peeled?
Keep your ear to the ground?
Keep your hopes up?
Keep your eye on the prize?
Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer?
Keep your cool?

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: fiverx313

Most of the question you ask contain a demand we explain it to you where an explanation requires us to backtrack over the previous three threads. That's why you get told what you get told.

If you want that explanation, go through those threads. For someone to try to type you an explanation would require them to do as much and create some kind of bizarre shorthand. Read just Dashen's indices alone for an idea.

If a summary is what you want, then that legwork is all on you.

honestly, i feel that more often than not i ask for someone to point me towards proof of a specific claim, and those questions usually go unanswered. or i'm asking a general 'what has been accomplished' or 'what is compelling evidence so far'.

no one asking about einstein's theories would be told they need to go read everything einstein wrote before they can be offered a *cough* crumb of knowledge... so those kinds of answers tend to make a skeptic think there isn't a man behind the curtain after all.

but i will keep watching to see if he pops up anyhow. i'm curious like that.

a reply to: fiverx313

Well, if you've been watching, you know what's there and it's either been proven or not and you shouldn't have to ask.

a reply to: tigertatzen

Keep your pantyhose on?


Sorry, movie quote kinda mood.

a reply to: tigertatzen

I like keep your hopes up.

Anyone else having trouble uploading jpegs or is this just a me thing?

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical

People on the whole don't seem to be much more aware than they were in the past, the same percentages of people just have life pass them by and only get their information from approved sources. They actually get mad when you try and show them that what they've thought was the truth for so long is really just cleverly constructed phantasms;

Tell me about it.

If q has mention it, no matter how 'common' knowledge it is, it gets 12 stars and thumbs up responses. If q hasn't, no matter how establishment shattering, one star and pretty much skipped past and ignored.

a reply to: Greenanon
Works easier with ".jpg" than ".jpeg"

a reply to: Greenanon

Png works much better