[email protected] Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART 4

a reply to: CoramDeo

He should be in prison not National Security Advisor to POTUS.

You know what? # it, let's make McCain Chief of Staff.

Erik Prince can head DoD.

I mean if you're gonna do it, do it right. We can wipe out the entire Middle East in a fortnight. Hand it over to Israel and peace at last.

a reply to: AnkhMorpork
I've got 2 This should be our National Anthem as far as I'm concerned



And This is where I'm at with regards to being scre**ed over by "Them". I used one with lyrics because they are right on lol!

a reply to: Rosinitiate

What did I miss about him? Why should he be in prison? I knew he's kinda a jerk but didn't realize he's criminal, help a girl out?

a reply to: Rosinitiate


I like what another poster said, that it's not permanent, only for a certain outcome relating to both NK and Iran ie: the inverse of what Bush did by simply pointing and saying "axis of evil".

Then, when Flynn is cleared, bring him back in! Re-hire Flynn. Could you imagine?! Oh that would be good. Bolton comes in, they do the deal in North Korea, put pressure on Iran to ammend the deal, then out he goes.

That kind of move would really galvanize Trump's base big time, for November, and 2020.

Q hinted that we would come know eventually who we were mostly talking to and that it would surprise us ie: a known entity.

Also remember that 2018 is still going to be glorious.

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
a reply to: Rosinitiate


I like what another poster said, that it's not permanent, only for a certain outcome relating to both NK and Iran ie: the inverse of what Bush did by simply pointing and saying "axis of evil".

Then, when Flynn is cleared, bring him back in! Re-hire Flynn. Could you imagine?! Oh that would be good. Bolton comes in, they do the deal in North Korea, put pressure on Iran to ammend the deal, then out he goes.

That kind of move would really galvanize Trump's base big time, for November, and 2020.

Q hinted that we would come know eventually who we were mostly talking to and that it would surprise us ie: a known entity.

Also remember that 2018 is still going to be glorious.

..........

Ok. We'll just go with that than.

originally posted by: Lilroanie
a reply to: Rosinitiate

What did I miss about him? Why should he be in prison? I knew he's kinda a jerk but didn't realize he's criminal, help a girl out?

If nothing else, helping in the cover up of 911.

a reply to: Lilroanie


Bolton would know what went on on 9/11 and ran with the devilish mandate that it was designed to produce by his involvement with people like Dick Cheney, Wolfowitz and company, when he served as United Nations Ambassador for the Bush administration. He's deep into that entire historical nightmare, and makes no apologies for what he was involved with ie: has said that the war wasn't really a mistake. He and Trump are totally out of synch on that one, but I guess Trump gets to make the decisions. Nevertheless, it's disturbing, unless there's awareness and understanding that terrible mistakes were made.

To have the same guy come back..

I believe that it's not permanent.

a reply to: Rosinitiate
AnkhMorpork
Gotcha Thanks! My old brain has forgotten too many details of 911 and who is involved, names and stuff!

a reply to: AnkhMorpork

Trump put on his "crazy madman" hat to get Kim Jong to tone down his threats. Bringing on Bolton is a logical extension of that strategy. Kim Jong gets intelligence briefings and likely watches FoxNews too. (Bolton is a guest 2 to 3 times a week) Kim knows hard hard-nosed Bolton is. He's probably talking with his military people about war-monger Bolton, right now.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: WhatTheory

originally posted by: liveandlearn
a reply to: WhatTheory

Just heard this. Why would he chose Bolton? Because he is a hardliner? I just don't like him influencing the potus.

I don't know about Bolton but I bet McMaster was the leaker.

Trump sending a message to NK by appointing Bolton.
Good call.
McM was planning to retire anyways. I think this has been planned for some time.

John Bolton is a frequent contributor on FoxNews. Two week ago, he said that the endless, complex preparations for Donald Trump to sit down with Kim Jong are a waste of time.

He said the President could fly over there before the end of March and meet with Kim Jong. Tell him to let U.N. inspectors and engineers dismantle and remove his nuclear weapons/production facilities.

If Jong agrees, get the ball rolling. If not, return home and tighten the screws on N.K. even further.

I'm sure that resonated with our Businessman/President Trump, because he too likes to do things without all the useless "fluff" that governments and diplomats like to surround themselves with.

I like this analysis. Bolton was the guy who basically engineered the Dayton Accords. President the Donald does seem to often surround himself with nuts and bolts people who know how to get things done. Bolton seems pretty politically neutral to me. No nonsense, and a refreshing bluntness.

originally posted by: diggindirt

originally posted by: OveRcuRrEnteD
a reply to: purplemer

There are pages and pages and pages of unverifed connections being discussed in this very thread.

That is how brainstorming works. The cream floats to the top. I appreciate your skepticism but it's really getting repetitive at this point. Anyone who really wants to know who Q is can deduce it with enough research as I'm sure plenty here have. There is no need to bring it here and jeopardize the thread. The information/disinformation issue is well understood to those who have followed and/or studied the Q posts. I'm having a hard time understanding why you need 10 posts to say basically the same thing.

I think this bears repeating.

Those who don't want to participate should refrain from doing so. There are a multitude of us out here who don't have the time to do the research that the people in this thread are accomplishing. Getting numerous ideas/opinions is always a good thing when searching.

I don't understand the constant snarking by those who make the decision not to participate, not to do any research, only to bash those who are trying to make sense of things. I'm quite sure there are dozens of threads available to those who want to mock people studying the Q phenomenon. Perhaps those of you who have nothing to add except skepticism could contribute to those threads. This set of Q threads are the kind of research and discussions that drew me to ATS many, many years before I ever signed up, before every single post had some troll attempting to make the whole issue partisan or black v. white. (I blame that stupid Shrub for that with his "If you're not with us you're against us." crap when he was going to his phony war.)

It just makes sense to me that if thousands or even millions of people are doing research and sharing ideas, somebody, sometime, is going to stumble on the truth. I learn something each and every time I have a chance to catch up on this thread. That is valuable to me. I can read ten newspapers a day and not learn one useful fact because they all have the same stories.

So thanks again to all who are making contributions and throwing out ideas.

Though I am sometimes annoyed by the naysayers...I still value, that they are an intregal part of the system/process. This set of threads is a major shift in the ATS zeitgeist. Healthy debate has always thrived here. But, this form of contributive cooperation, is kind of new, in general.

But, it is...and has to be...a dynamic process. An evolved conversation...that may somewhat resemble an echo chamber...depends upon stressors, to keep it moving and evolving. In a way, it can be thought of as a memetic analog to the immune system. Hothouse flowers, comes to mind sometimes...

originally posted by: Enderdog

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: WhatTheory

originally posted by: liveandlearn
a reply to: WhatTheory

Just heard this. Why would he chose Bolton? Because he is a hardliner? I just don't like him influencing the potus.

I don't know about Bolton but I bet McMaster was the leaker.

Trump sending a message to NK by appointing Bolton.
Good call.
McM was planning to retire anyways. I think this has been planned for some time.

John Bolton is a frequent contributor on FoxNews. Two week ago, he said that the endless, complex preparations for Donald Trump to sit down with Kim Jong are a waste of time.

He said the President could fly over there before the end of March and meet with Kim Jong. Tell him to let U.N. inspectors and engineers dismantle and remove his nuclear weapons/production facilities.

If Jong agrees, get the ball rolling. If not, return home and tighten the screws on N.K. even further.

I'm sure that resonated with our Businessman/President Trump, because he too likes to do things without all the useless "fluff" that governments and diplomats like to surround themselves with.

I like this analysis. Bolton was the guy who basically engineered the Dayton Accords. President the Donald does seem to often surround himself with nuts and bolts people who know how to get things done. Bolton seems pretty politically neutral to me. No nonsense, and a refreshing bluntness.

Also, the liberal Twitter accounts, and liberal MSM channels are blowing up with a universal hatred of John Bolton. That alone tells me that the former U.N. Ambassador is perfect for the job.

originally posted by: Perfectenemy

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
a reply to: carewemust

Hmm. Something is definitely up. Infinity is getting bombarded with Pelicans,Fake Q's and Flat Earthers since wednesday. It looks like someone pushed all the panic buttons at once.

There's also a thread about the ultra-wealthy undertaking preparations to "protect" themselves against incoming threats.

I hinted at that in my previous posts. Why do you think Trump talks about a space force and colonization of other planets so much and the media is really busy in spinning his ideas to proof Trump lost it. I witnessed It and i hope It will never come to pass. In this case i truly hope i'm wrong.

I have seen remarkably little attention, to Prez the Donald's off hand disclosure of the Space Force. To me this is yuge. He does his usual (and effective) threepeat of the idea...gently turning an initial joking comment, into a serious idea. He is a master of NLP, and state chaining. Part of the reason he caught so many people by surprise...and still does...is because he uses emotional engineering to move forward, rather than logical.

The logic is actually in there. He just knows that all decision making is irrational. To flip it and support the logical reason for that approach...empirically, doing what actually works, works.

I forget who said it...but I like this quote. "In theory, practice and theory, are identical. In practice, they are not."

a reply to: CoramDeo

"The Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate's Experimental Plasma Effects Weapon"

Ah great - now they will not only beam triggers over the phone or through "telepathy" we'll all be at the mercy of Yahweh speaking out of the sky

Yahweh: "Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's"

Trans: "Keep paying taxes"

originally posted by: LurkNoMore

Here a bot there a bot e-aye-e-I-o

Bots get served round these parts who talks like that?

Is it possible that we bio-bots, are consistently unpredictable enough to confound the software bots, on a large enough scale?

Am beginning to think that the Q "booms" are people being replaced in Trumps admin. Fox news

John Bolton to replace H.R. McMaster as White House national security adviser, Trump says

How many is this now?

I just saw this.

Hacker Guccifer 2.0 identified as Russian intelligence officer through IP address: report

The hacker Guccifer 2.0, who claimed responsibility for providing Wikileaks with the stolen Democratic National Committee emails, has been identified as an officer of Russia’s main intelligence directorate, or GRU, according to a new report.

While the U.S. intelligence community concluded in a January 2017 report that the GRU used the persona to release the hacked emails, it was not previously known that a specific officer had been identified.

I don't know if this is relevant in any way. But it seems there has been an increased amount of talk of Seth Rich lately. Maybe this is an attempted spin. I don't put any trust in this report. Now if they named the actual person I would be more inclined to believe it.

Edit: as soon as I posted this, I checked the new threads and found this one already in progress.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Giustra

The King Of Pump and Dump

incakolanews.blogspot.com.au...

5/10/16 The CEO.ca pump and dump scam site: Past, present and future What Tommy Humphreys has put together at his CEO.ca website is a new version of old-time pumping and dumping that caters a new audience of millennials. The concept is fair enough and it's even managed to rope in well-known names in the Canadian mining scene who add to the chat and give the site superficial kudos (e.g. John Kaiser, Brent Cook, Eric Coffin, who are hopefully merely ignorant about the way they're being used) but when push comes to shove there are bills to be paid and the only way of doing that is transferring the cash of its audience into the back pocket of its owner, Tommy Humphreys (mentored and sponsored by Frank Giustra, dontchaknow).


Here are three examples (of many) of how that cash transfer system works.


Past: Exhibit A is the recent pump of Lithium-X (LIX.v), the Frank Giustra lithium thing that set alight a couple of months ago. Its name was pumped at CEO.ca non-stop on the way up, not just by Humphreys but by his band of so-called "independent journalists" who've basically taken their 30 pieces of silver, names such as Kip Keen and James Kwantes. But then, suddenly and after Humphreys' "friends and family" early stage placement shares came out of escrow, the stock peaked and LIX has dropped by a sharp 30% or so. And coincidentally, LIX.v is off the menu at the CEO.ca chat and rarely mentioned these days. The only things you hear on LIX are "Oh it must be hard if you bought at the top but don't worry folks, things'll be just fine" pleasantries to soothe the concerns of the greenhorns who bought badly.

a reply to: TRUEAWAKENING

Hey how about a bit of warning as to what your youtube links lead to?

How is this relevant to this thread

a reply to: abago71

Maybe pre-emptive spin before new info comes out that implicates the DNC?