-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART 4

a reply to: Perfectenemy

Also, #ReleaseTheMemo started on the Q board and i was there from it's inception. We knew in advance and almost to the day when the Memo would be released. Made big waves on Twitter as it was one of the top trending hashtags of all time.

What I hate, reading between the lines of some posters is their contempt.

"Only be sure that thou eat not the blood: for the blood is the life"

Deuteronomy 12:23

a reply to: Perfectenemy

ou want to play fine. Lets have at it shall we. I called Comey's firing. I called Q's next drop mentioning voter fraud hence Trust Kansas. McCabe firing. That's only a few predictions i made that came true i don't keep track but be my guest i guess. Some other members challenged me already and nobody managed to disprove me so far.

Ok and what does that prove. I could give you lists of predictions and false axioms peeps have made from Q. What does that tell you.

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
Of course YT went overboard with there virtue signaling. This unquestioned censorship is getting way out of hand.

They are all still trying to follow the agenda they would be following if Hillary had won.

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
a reply to: Perfectenemy

Also, #ReleaseTheMemo started on the Q board and i was there from it's inception. We knew in advance and almost to the day when the Memo would be released. Made big waves on Twitter as it was one of the top trending hashtags of all time.

What I hate, reading between the lines of some posters is their contempt.

Yes I think it is well established that Q is related to the white house and would have information. You are not saying anything.

originally posted by: purplemer
a reply to: MountainLaurel

I see my role in this as an investigator. Hey I was curious, forgive me if I missed this somehow, did you think that Q's remarks about Israel, shortly after you brought up your concerns Q wasn't mentioning Israel, was a coincidence ??

Sorry missed that part. I considered it odd that it was not mentioned for months than appeared after I mentioned it yes. The links between Israel and the deep state are huge. Nobody is taking on the deepstate without taking on the Zionists.

But again Q gave nothing. Apart from a vague promise that more was to come. Still nothing though

FFS with your Israel BS. Yeah no attempt to derail this thread at all my ass. Make a Rats thread why Israel is so evil but please leave us alone and hey don't forget to prove it because you know some might call your findings fake news otherwise.

originally posted by: Skyfloating

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
Of course YT went overboard with there virtue signaling. This unquestioned censorship is getting way out of hand.

They are all still trying to follow the agenda they would be following if Hillary had won.

Funny Q is taking on the deep state can cause massive resignations, the house of saudi to fall but cant take on the mighty youtube.

Pass the fish sauce!

a reply to: Perfectenemy

FFS with your Israel BS. Yeah no attempt to derail this thread at all my ass. Make a Rats thread why Israel is so evil but please leave us alone and hey don't forget to prove it because you know some might call your findings fake news otherwise.

No need to be rude. Somebody asked me about Israel and I answered there question. Have I hit a nerve dear :-)

a reply to: purplemer

Nobody has deduced Q here.

in the thread or personally? I know the answer to both questions.

Can you tell who Q is.

Not 100% but I have a good idea

Can you tell me Qs motives

No. that's why i follow and research

Can you tell me why Q is vague to the point of fault. No you cannot.

a)Plausible deniabilty. b)wrong

I am ontopic and not jeopardizing the thread.

that wasn't my point but ok. I meant discussing who Q is instead of the posts which is the topic of the threads

No verifable news is fake news.!

can't disagree with that

anyway...all ATS pages and infinity threads saved offline. I'm all caught up! Thank you snow day!

originally posted by: proximo
a reply to: tiredoflooking

That would mean instant bankruptcy, nobody will pay to use Facebook - they have to sell the data to stay in business.

I posed a question, I believe in thread 3 that went something like this...

If I came to you and said I have a new site that does the following:

1. It's a social networking site that respects opinioin and all forms of free speech.
2. It's a search engine that provides unbiased, relevant search results
3. It's a video hosting site that alows all manner of legal content
4. It's an email host that provides secure, encrpted communication with no data mining
5. The site keeps no search data
6. The site has no outside advertising, all content pages are ad free
7. No user data will be sold or otherwise be given t any third party
8. User profiles and all associated content can be permanently deleted

How much would you pay for a monthly subscription to a site that offered that?

I noted that you stated...

We really need to either break these internet giants up or actually regulate them. They will not regulate themselves, and you can't depend on users to care about their privacy enough to stop using them. It's only going to get worse.

I cringe when I hear someone say, "more government is the answer". I think the answer is building a better product. There is a multi-billion dollar idea sitting right there for anyone to pick up.

I would think that, at this point, anyone reading and digging into Q crumbs would realize that government is not a solution, its the problem.

originally posted by: purplemer


Funny Q is taking on the deep state can cause massive resignations, the house of saudi to fall but cant take on the mighty youtube.

Pass the fish sauce!

Youtube is a private company. They are not subject to free speech laws.

originally posted by: purplemer
a reply to: Perfectenemy

FFS with your Israel BS. Yeah no attempt to derail this thread at all my ass. Make a Rats thread why Israel is so evil but please leave us alone and hey don't forget to prove it because you know some might call your findings fake news otherwise.

No need to be rude. Somebody asked me about Israel and I answered there question. Have I hit a nerve dear :-)

My concern lies only with this thread and making up BS reasons to shut it down. Talking about Israel attracts certain people i don't want to read or hear from in here. Like i said open a thread and problem solved or better yet do some research on any Q drop yourself. I truly dislike people who come into this thread and question the work we do without contributing anything valuable themselves. That's disrespectful to all the members here who posted a massive amount of information all the lazy people didn't bother to read. I don't see you posting any well documented sources for all your claims either btw.

a reply to: Perfectenemy

Responding to detractors is not fruitful. Ignoring them is the best choice, IMO.

originally posted by: Skyfloating

originally posted by: purplemer


Funny Q is taking on the deep state can cause massive resignations, the house of saudi to fall but cant take on the mighty youtube.

Pass the fish sauce!

Youtube is a private company. They are not subject to free speech laws.

Youtube like reddit / facebook / twitter etc are controlled gateways that work hand in hand with the intelligence services acting as guardians and censors and collectors of information.

originally posted by: purplemer

originally posted by: Skyfloating

originally posted by: purplemer


Funny Q is taking on the deep state can cause massive resignations, the house of saudi to fall but cant take on the mighty youtube.

Pass the fish sauce!

Youtube is a private company. They are not subject to free speech laws.

Youtube like reddit / facebook / twitter etc are controlled gateways that work hand in hand with the intelligence services acting as guardians and censors and collectors of information.

Wouldn't it be wise to educate people so that they know this and can demand something better?

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Perfectenemy

Responding to detractors is not fruitful. Ignoring them is the best choice, IMO.

If you are refeering to me I am not detracting. Sorry if I question your cosy little illusion. QAnon is using ambiguous unvefirable terminoloy on purpose and mixing it with truth also.

Your versed in Q. Two pages ago there was talk about the booms. Q has used that term many times. What does it mean. You may have an idea but you cannot verify it. Where does that leave you.

Really you dont have much of a clue to what is actually going on here. Its a shame because Q is very interesting.

You would rather jump on the merry Q train and clamp your hands without actually working out where that train is going.

Good luck with that. Your in for a fall.

a reply to: CoramDeo

Wouldn't it be wise to educate people so that they know this and can demand something better?

Yes it would be wise to educate peeps so they demand something better. Its a poor show. Decentralised social media based on block chain is slowly emerging. Maybe this will be the answer or maybe it will be stifled too

originally posted by: CoramDeo

originally posted by: proximo
a reply to: tiredoflooking

That would mean instant bankruptcy, nobody will pay to use Facebook - they have to sell the data to stay in business.

I posed a question, I believe in thread 3 that went something like this...

If I came to you and said I have a new site that does the following:

1. It's a social networking site that respects opinioin and all forms of free speech.
2. It's a search engine that provides unbiased, relevant search results
3. It's a video hosting site that alows all manner of legal content
4. It's an email host that provides secure, encrpted communication with no data mining
5. The site keeps no search data
6. The site has no outside advertising, all content pages are ad free
7. No user data will be sold or otherwise be given t any third party
8. User profiles and all associated content can be permanently deleted

How much would you pay for a monthly subscription to a site that offered that?

I noted that you stated...

We really need to either break these internet giants up or actually regulate them. They will not regulate themselves, and you can't depend on users to care about their privacy enough to stop using them. It's only going to get worse.

I cringe when I hear someone say, "more government is the answer". I think the answer is building a better product. There is a multi-billion dollar idea sitting right there for anyone to pick up.

I would think that, at this point, anyone reading and digging into Q crumbs would realize that government is not a solution, its the problem.

I would, I would pay to use a secure service.

But beyond that , it could still be done with advertising. There is no need for payment.

There is plenty enough revenue from advertising and those advertisers do not need to know what colour your breakfast cornflakes were.

Advertising has exsisted before Facebook gave them a direct path into our skulls.
They could again.

Plus any brand involved with such a great , people positive, privacy loving company could develop it's own cult following.

It is a hell of an idea. Kim Dotcom SAYS he is doing it, even posted a help wanted ad offering to give people an awesome computer station and the ability to work from home.

Hope it happens! It's a REALLY good idea for these current times.

twitter.com...

Oh look what a coincidence. Q drop predicting Russian Reset. qanonposts.com

realDonaldTrump

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Perfectenemy

Responding to detractors is not fruitful. Ignoring them is the best choice, IMO.

You're absolutely right. Thanks for reminding me.