-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART 4

a reply to: Skyfloating

Jacinda Ardern: Socialist Agnostic who was involved with the Blair family from the UK before she became NZ PM

freemasonsnz.org...


Their new leader Jacinda Ardern was

Brought up as a Mormon -
Her father Ross Ardern,
A long serving police officer,
went on to serve as Niue's chief of police,
And later after retiring from his 40-year policing career,
Became New Zealand’s High Commissioner to the small Pacific nation.

Jacinda was educated at Waikato university,
Assisted, by a Freemasons scholarship,
Which tells you something about her family ties,
And reflects yet another MP,
Whose promotion was assisted by select interests,
who enforce the states quo power base,
of the ‘old boys school tie’ network.

Her Background,
Is in public relations.
Her parting with the Mormon church,
Came around the same time she first went to work for Phil Goff,
Goff, is The current Mayor Of Auckland,
A supporter of privatisation who proposed the sale of Auckland’s ports.
He is also, A member of Parliamentarians for Global action.
Jacinda then worked for Helen Clark,
Clark, is A supporter of privatisation,
a proponent of the TPPA,
a Member of both the Club De Madrid,
& Parliamentarians for Global action,
Who, with support from John Key,
Has made attempts to become the UN’s next Secretary General.

Jacinda’s past employment,
included a review of policing in the UK and Wales,
Which was first brought about because of the John Stalker affair in the 1980’s,
Which demonstrated Freemasonry,
Had a strong influence on the UK policing system.
A general ban on Freemasons joining the police,
followed the affair.
This widely reported issue was made into several films and dramas,
Including Irvine Welsh, Filth & Porridge.
In 1990 there was again,
UK media focus on police corruption,
Pertaining to the abuse of children,
By senior police officers.
However, Jacinda,
with assistance from this particular corner,
of the old boys school tie network,
participated in an orchestrated whitewashing of the issue,
The resulting investigations,
Conveniently found nothing…
Demonstrating yet again,
That Freemasonry,
Was still in control of the UK police force,
With lodges deliberately flouting bans on members joining the police,
following the Stalker affair.

Jacinda then went to work for the Better Regulation authority in the UK,
A pro business agency.
It was set up to assist large corporates in the European Union,
By establishing legislation that both,
Reduced regulations for major corporates,
And strangled small businesses with red tape.

Although we do not have confirmation that Jacinda herself,
Is a member of the globalist Parliamentarians for Global Action,
Nearly all of her Labour party Mentors, Goff, Clark, Shearer And Roberts, ARE.

In 2008
Ardern told Parliament it was unspeakable that New Zealand form a parliamentary select committee, to question the science of climate change.

In 2011,
Assisted by members of Parliamentarians for Global Action,
Phil Goff & David Shearer respectively,
Jacinda shot up the party list,
Despite having no real profile,

Her Partner,
Clark Gayford,
is a well known TV presenter in the Auckland Media crowd,
and will undoubtedly make sure she gets good press.

In summary,
Jacinda generally appears to be a career politician,
Groomed from the start,
And tipped for a post election career,
in the UN.
Just like Clark.

www.thevinnyeastwoodshow.com...

a reply to: TRUEAWAKENING
Some potential additional spins on "Boom":

1) "Baby Boomers" are the generational peak in births that have occurred every 20 years or so since the post World War II spike in births as husbands returned from war.
2) BOOMerang - could imply more antipodean relevations.

a reply to: TRUEAWAKENING

meow.
lets play nice please
do you have an opinion on the ubiquitous prevalence in ancient societies of wanting to kill evil giants?

a reply to: TRUEAWAKENING

do you think this logo is significant?

Ex-FBI Assistant Director: There Was A "High-Ranking" Plot To Protect Hillary; Brennan Leaked "Weekly"

"I think it goes right to the top. And it involves that whole strategy - they were gonna win, nobody would have known any of this stuff, and they just unleashed the intelligence community. Look at the unmaskings. We haven't heard anything about that yet. Look at the way they violated the rights of all those American citizens."

Brennan=BOOM

a reply to: thepixelpusher

wow. everything is so leaky on the left.
their ship is sinking and the rats will start to run soon

originally posted by: FlyingFox
Otherwise, I just wanted to jump in and declare that I think maybe the end game of the plan is 9-11 disclosure. There's a few reasons I believe this, but in short....what else would make every living cabal member go completely ape# like we have seen in the last year? Surely a few peado accusations alone isn't enough, and is easily covered-up. Consider the SA connection and Brennan's field office issuing their vistas. What else would make them all go c-r-a-z-y? I'm not a "truther", but am well-learned.

For sure, John Brennan is crapping bricks over something. And it isn't because McCabe got fired. He must know he's got a reservation at a black site somewhere.

originally posted by: proximo

originally posted by: carewemust
Senator RAND PAUL is a peculiar Republican. Take today for example. In just 24 hours he:

Vowed to Block Trump nominees for State Dept and CIA.
nypost.com...
(Booooo!)

AND

Labeled former CIA Director Brennan's Anti-Trump tweets as "Disgraceful".
www.foxnews.com... (Yea!)

The "vow to block" story was covered by every MSM. The attack on Brennan was covered by no MSM, but Fox. Rand Paul has a lot of guts, fire and energy, but loyalty to whom or what???

He has loyalty to his principals. If all of Congress did, stuff might actually get accomplished.

Instead most are corrupt dirtbags or fearful to have an opinion that goes against the party line.

I’m curious what is going on with McCain, his seat suddenly becomes real important in getting anything past the senate.

I have a lot of respect for Rand Paul. He's one of the few people in congress with actual principles that matter. He's possibly the only senator who does.

originally posted by: Wookiep
On another note.. did you guys see the recent thread about the bomber in Austin? (Another one) I guess there have been a couple incidents now. I have trouble posting links on this device, but did Q mention watching Texas or did I imagine that?

I know Tigertatzen was concerned...

I don't remember Q mentioning it, but in the Q-themed Twitter threads a lot of people were posting an article that was looking for crisis actors for an event in Texas. And yes, I think the date was this past weekend.

Good Morning, Q Knights.
Let's be nice to each other.
We all have common ground here...let's use it wisely and to good effect.

Division is what the enemy wants.

"Where we go one, we go all."

BTW: In addition to Q...That quote is from the 1996 film 'White Squall':

Captain Christopher Sheldon:
If we don't have order, we have nothing. Where we go one, we go all.

www.imdb.com...

originally posted by: FlyingFox
As a tactic, Muller hiring all of the hardcore Dem legal experts places them in a position of conflict-of-interest so as they can not represent any of the people associated with the investigation.

Interesting angle, one I have not heard of or thought of until your post.

I am still not sold in Mueller as white hat but this thought would support the theory.

Good day Patriots,

Working my way thru "top donors" to Clinton Foundation and will post findings later today. Be well

PS so far I have noticed a common theme $, media spin & children worldwide.
Sick

So this whole FB / Cambridge University data mining issue , as related to Political campaigns, is interesting to ponder. It's pretty common knowledge that data is collected and used to "customize" adds that are directed at individuals...LOL...how else would they know that I eye-balled those cute pink sandal's a month ago ! Seriously, up till now I haven't really worried about what data FB might collect on me, especially since I keep it a "lighthearted" , non-political part of my life to keep in touch with family and friends....yup, one of those weirdo's that enjoys seeing pics of the of my loved ones wacky lives, especially their pets.

I mentioned in an earlier post that during the 2016 Presidential election I was BOMBARDED with Pro-Hillary adds on FB. In typical hypocritical fashion now somehow Trump using FB data is un-ethical ?? Now I can totally understand the concerns about this on several levels, but if Trump did use this data to somehow tap into the issues that People are concerned about, is that un-ethical ?

Over the weekend, Edward Snowden tweeted to point out that social media companies are really surveilance companies:

Businesses that make money by collecting and selling detailed records of private lives were once plainly described as "surveillance companies." Their rebranding as "social media" is the most successful deception since the Department of War became the Department of Defense.

I really don't know what to make of Snowden. It seems to me that Q hates him, but his actions so far make me wonder if he's really a white hat.

a reply to: MountainLaurel

From my look through, the illegality is in how they acquired their data. The overall issue itself isn't illegal yet. I don't like it ... the various ways they manipulate the data they collect, but they're complaining now because they aren't the only ones making use of the technique to good effect.

Recall how Hillary's "spiritual" advisor who was accused of sexual misconduct was actually head of a datamining firm dedicated to tracking religious/values voters and not actually what you would think of as a spiritual advisor?

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

He may be trying to play two ends against the middle.

Ok, you guys need to watch this Ed Butowski Interview that got posted today about the Seth Rich story. After watching this, I am 99% sure Rich is the source of the DNC emails.



So, he drops several bombshells.

1. The first time he talked to Seth Rich's father, the father admitted he knew that both Seth & his brother Aaron leaked to wikileaks.

2. The family is scared about this info coming out for 2 reasons. 1. They are scared for their other son's (Aarron) life. 2. They are scared of violence from crazy liberals blaming them for Donald getting Elected / destroying the Russia narrative.

3. He mentions a crazy internet clock was put online timed to when his son was going back to Vanderbuilt. I think this might very well be the PANDA clock. Basically seems he was being threatened to stay quiet.

4. He says Fox news was stopped from reporting on the story because they were trying to acquire the remaining portion of sky news, but people were talking to British Parliament to stop the acquisition because of the Seth Rich story.

5. He says wheeler was promised up to 4 million by the lawyers involved in stopping this sky news acquistion. Presumably to stay quiet.

I do not think Butowsky is lying in the least. In fact he comes off to me as VERY naive as to how dangerous what he is doing is.

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
Over the weekend, Edward Snowden tweeted to point out that social media companies are really surveilance companies:

Businesses that make money by collecting and selling detailed records of private lives were once plainly described as "surveillance companies." Their rebranding as "social media" is the most successful deception since the Department of War became the Department of Defense.

I really don't know what to make of Snowden. It seems to me that Q hates him, but his actions so far make me wonder if he's really a white hat.

Plus Snowden when off on Russian ballot box stuffing with Putins new election. Hardly something to do when they are your Host country.

It's a good way to get you Irradiated or get the "twitch of death".

originally posted by: MountainLaurel
So this whole FB / Cambridge University data mining issue , as related to Political campaigns, is interesting to ponder. It's pretty common knowledge that data is collected and used to "customize" adds that are directed at individuals...LOL...how else would they know that I eye-balled those cute pink sandal's a month ago !

Seriously, up till now I haven't really worried about what data FB might collect on me, especially since I keep it a "lighthearted" , non-political part of my life to keep in touch with family and friends....yup, one of those weirdo's that enjoys seeing pics of the of my loved ones wacky lives, especially their pets.

I mentioned in an earlier post that during the 2016 Presidential election I was BOMBARDED with Pro-Hillary adds on FB. In typical hypocritical fashion now somehow Trump using FB data is un-ethical ?? Now I can totally understand the concerns about this on several levels, but if Trump did use this data to somehow tap into the issues that People are concerned about, is that un-ethical ?

It's only unethical when the opposing side uses the same tactics, when your side uses them, it's morally appropriate. Notice how Facebook and Google had ZERO problems taking money from both sides. Or the MSM giving Trump Millions of Dollars for free publicity, then they rail about Trump this and Trump that. Like Trump says, the MSM loves him, he's made them Millions of Dollars this past election.

originally posted by: MountainLaurel
Seriously, up till now I haven't really worried about what data FB might collect on me, especially since I keep it a "lighthearted" , non-political part of my life to keep in touch with family and friends....yup, one of those weirdo's that enjoys seeing pics of the of my loved ones wacky lives, especially their pets.

They are able to determine your sexual orientation on 10 likes, 50 - 70 likes analyzed and they know more about you than you do ... no kidding, just analyzing likes on FB.