UFO Photographed In 1937 Flying Above City Hall In Vancouver, Canada

originally posted by: JimOberg

originally posted by: Blue Shift
The photo looks flat, like it had a stray drop of developer fluid on it when they hung it up to dry.

Since it was midday in a large city and NOBODY else went on record as noticing it, what does Occam's Razor suggest?

And in a time before the digital age as well.

People would have noticed. Many more people were outside more, and not looking at their phones.

originally posted by: JimOberg

originally posted by: Blue Shift
The photo looks flat, like it had a stray drop of developer fluid on it when they hung it up to dry.

Since it was midday in a large city and NOBODY else went on record as noticing it, what does Occam's Razor suggest?

I would like to add to this that Vancouver was, at the time, a tree filled city and resides in some very hilly topography in some areas.

There was also a certain stigma around things like this back then. Not somthing you go around talking about willy nilly.

a reply to: Illumimasontruth

Yep,like everybody walks round looking at the sky eh.

Quite a find.

I’ll be sure to look further in this.

Again, nice find. Never heard or scene the photo before.

originally posted by: seaswine
a reply to: DerBeobachter

Exactly what I thought of too! Same shape and appearance of an "interior".

Fake or not, neat looking pic.

Except in those paintings they represent the sun and the moon.

a reply to: FamCore

In 1937 we had rockets like that? don't think so!

originally posted by: Illumimasontruth

originally posted by: JimOberg

originally posted by: Blue Shift
The photo looks flat, like it had a stray drop of developer fluid on it when they hung it up to dry.

Since it was midday in a large city and NOBODY else went on record as noticing it, what does Occam's Razor suggest?

And in a time before the digital age as well.

People would have noticed. Many more people were outside more, and not looking at their phones.

Lol, so true...

a reply to: badw0lf


Must have been some big news that day. Mabey the local sports team won or possibly the latest pinup girl is a real looker!


Never the less I sure see a lot of down turned caps.

Good thread OP, hadn't heard of this before either.

I'm going with real...mainly because Oberg chimed in. Dead giveaway.

a reply to: RawIntel

Yep,been happening for a while as ive seen it from my 10yrs plus of lurking.

I’ve never seen or heard of this one either. Kinda shocked a pic this clear was not circulated more over the years. S+f

I really hope they reveal themselves soon. Even then debunkers would dismiss it as fake.

originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: shawmanfromny

It looks like the Norwegian spiral and other "rockets" we've seen

Russia:

California:

China:

Rockets in Canada in 1937? Are you sure about that?

originally posted by: JimOberg
a reply to: FamCore

"It looks like the Norwegian spiral and other "rockets" we've seen"

Which all reality-based people realize WERE rockets.

Again, Canadian rockets in 1937? You guys need to check your history... I would expect more from you Jim...

originally posted by: RawIntel
Good thread OP, hadn't heard of this before either.

I'm going with real...mainly because Oberg chimed in. Dead giveaway.

I'm particularly interested in this picture because it's been used before to 'prove' that a lot of modern images of rocket launchings must be 'real UFOs' because they look like THIS pre-spaceflight emulsion flaw. That's what passes for 'disproof of debunking' in some quarters these days.

The V-1 was the first of the so-called "Vengeance weapons" (V-weapons or Vergeltungswaffen) series designed for terror bombing of London. It was developed at Peenemünde Army Research Center in 1939 by the Nazi German Luftwaffe during the Second World War. 

Bold is mine...

The V-1 flying bomb (German: Vergeltungswaffe 1 "Vengeance Weapon 1"[a])—also known to the Allies as the buzz bomb, or doodlebug,[3]and in Germany as Kirschkern (cherrystone) or Maikäfer (maybug)[5]—was an early cruise missile and the only production aircraft to use a pulsejet for power.

Wiki

a reply to: myss427

Ah, you beat me to it.

It would be funny if it wasn't so disgustingly ignorant.

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes

originally posted by: JimOberg
a reply to: FamCore

"It looks like the Norwegian spiral and other "rockets" we've seen"

Which all reality-based people realize WERE rockets.

Again, Canadian rockets in 1937? You guys need to check your history... I would expect more from you Jim...

Where did I say this 1937 photo was a rocket? My assertions are hard enough to argue for hereabouts, without people inventing bogus examples.

Now that the issue has come up, though -- where have I --EVER-- argued for a spectacular sky sighting as a rocket that you think I was mistaken? Example or two, please.

originally posted by: JourneymanWelder
I really hope they reveal themselves soon. Even then debunkers would dismiss it as fake.

Glad to see you concede it's all been 'fake' [as in, misinterpretations] so far.

Your hope has fuelled decade after decade of imminent expectations, all dashed. Not an encouraging track record.

a reply to: JimOberg

"It looks like the Norwegian spiral and other "rockets" we've seen"

Which all reality-based people realize WERE rockets.

Well I read that as you implying that this was a rocket too. Maybe you should have been a little clearer as you didn't say this wasn't a rocket but you already knew that.