It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: Sillyolme
Nunberg said that Mueller probably has something on trump. I take the word probably out of the sentence. He was a bit vague on what but he seems to think it's likely.
Mueller would have something on all of us if he dug deep enough and was investigating things that are very Petty in nature.
originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: Sillyolme
I found this quote interesting:
“They have requested a ridiculous amount of documents,” Mr. Nunberg said. “Should I spend 30 hours producing these? I don’t know what they have. They may very well have something on the president. But they are unfairly targeting Roger Stone.”
www.nytimes.com...
It seems that even Nunberg is conscious that they might actually have something on Trump.
ETA: That's weird, I posted that at the exact same time as your comment above lol
originally posted by: DBCowboy
I have a theory about this entire investigation and the Russian collusion saga.
The premise being that Trump is innocent.
If there had been a shred of guilt or of crimes committed by Trump then he would have never made it to the White House.
Why, you ask?
Because since Trump has been in he's cyreated a tax cut, eliminated the Obamacare mandate and the biggest thing he's done is bring a conservative to the Supreme Court.
If there had been ANY guilt associated with Tru.p, tptb would not have allowed so much of Obama's legacy to be shredded.
So I believe this all to be a witch Hunt.
In my opinion.
originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: Sillyolme
I found this quote interesting:
“They have requested a ridiculous amount of documents,” Mr. Nunberg said. “Should I spend 30 hours producing these? I don’t know what they have. They may very well have something on the president. But they are unfairly targeting Roger Stone.”
www.nytimes.com...
It seems that even Nunberg is conscious that they might actually have something on Trump.
ETA: That's weird, I posted that at the exact same time as your comment above lol
It looks to me like Nunberg has no idea if they have anything or not. In his interview with Bloomberg, Nunberg says, "He didn’t do anything. What is he going to do? His investigation is BS. Trump did not collude with Putin. It’s a joke."
“I think they may,” Nunberg said. “I think that he may have done something during the election.”
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust
Yeah stealing an election is just a minor inconvenience.
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: Sillyolme
Nunberg said that Mueller probably has something on trump. I take the word probably out of the sentence. He was a bit vague on what but he seems to think it's likely.
Mueller would have something on all of us if he dug deep enough and was investigating things that are very Petty in nature.
Possibly, why don't we wait to see what Mueller has found and can comb through his evidence to make our own judgments? Surely deciding the outcome of the situation before we've seen the evidence is folly?
originally posted by: Kyrios0Zero
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: AgarthaSeed
No one but conspiracy theorists are even looking at this. The rest of the world shakes its collective head in pity. Keep the crap out of my thread if you don't mind. It's off topic.
How can anyone keep crap out of your thread when 101% of your posts are utter bull#? I honestly can't tell if you are the dumbest person on this planet or a paid shill. The sad part is that even if you happen to be on a payroll, there are plenty of idiots whose thoughts actually do mirror the nonsense you post.
originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: Sillyolme
Nunberg said that Mueller probably has something on trump. I take the word probably out of the sentence. He was a bit vague on what but he seems to think it's likely.
Mueller would have something on all of us if he dug deep enough and was investigating things that are very Petty in nature.
Possibly, why don't we wait to see what Mueller has found and can comb through his evidence to make our own judgments? Surely deciding the outcome of the situation before we've seen the evidence is folly?
Everything Muller says, does, or even thinks leaks out to the press. Yet in all of those leaks we've never seen anything that sounds like proof Trump broke any laws. Nunes, Schiff and others on the intelligence oversite committees have said they've seen no evidence Trump colluded with Russia.