Who is the bigger fascist? Trump or Democrats?

a reply to: Eshel

or maybe, just maybe the real point.

Or someone just maybe is disparaging other members because they love arguing for the hell of it.

a reply to: timequake

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Do you respond to things without reading them?

*bonus points for double post*

originally posted by: notsure1

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: notsure1

The same way Trump would run into that school without a gun and capture/kill the shooter with his bare hands.

Duh.

What I am saying is The cops have automatic weapons the criminals have automatic weapons.

The biggest threat to a free state is not foreigners its the cops and the national guard and the government.

Hitler pulled the first documented false flag in history right before WWII so he could declare marshall law and disarm his populace. And we all know what happened after that right?

Now we have a Potus that all you guys have been calling HITLER and making comparison after comparison to HITLER actually saying he wants to take the guns before due process ....

AND YOU GUYS WANT TO LET HIM. PLEASE LET THAT SINK IN...

Us "Trump haters," aren't responsible for electing him as POTUS.

Let thank sink in.

I shall take my leave to.

I wish you guys good evening.

a reply to: RomeByFire

Us "Trump haters," aren't responsible for electing him as POTUS.

Kind of are.

Nothing soldifies the Rights hate than a Clinton.

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: DBCowboy

Wake me up when what Democrats say about guns is policy.

Seems like you've got a double standard going on there. Democrats say "take the guns first" and "oh my god! we have to stop them!" but when Trump says it "pffff, call me when it becomes law, no big deal".

See how hypocritical that sounds? Giving one guy a pass while acting like the world is going to end when another does the same thing.

Not really.

Because A) Leftists DO want to eliminate freedoms, and B) Trump uses it as a negotiating process. If I lost my sh#t every time Trump said something, I'd have nary a sh#t left.

Now leftists?

They have a decades-long history of wanting to eliminate freedoms.

originally posted by: swanne
a reply to: timequake

History might show you that what humans call "rights" are only that - rights set by humans for humans.

Those are not "rights" but are legal privileges. People often confuse the two, just as you did, throughout history.

originally posted by: RomeByFire

originally posted by: notsure1

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: notsure1

The same way Trump would run into that school without a gun and capture/kill the shooter with his bare hands.

Duh.

What I am saying is The cops have automatic weapons the criminals have automatic weapons.

The biggest threat to a free state is not foreigners its the cops and the national guard and the government.

Hitler pulled the first documented false flag in history right before WWII so he could declare marshall law and disarm his populace. And we all know what happened after that right?

Now we have a Potus that all you guys have been calling HITLER and making comparison after comparison to HITLER actually saying he wants to take the guns before due process ....

AND YOU GUYS WANT TO LET HIM. PLEASE LET THAT SINK IN...

Us "Trump haters," aren't responsible for electing him as POTUS.

Let thank sink in.

So you let him take your guns and hand them over willingly? I thought never Trump meant never Trump?

originally posted by: swanne
a reply to: notsure1

I care not about Trump, he's your president, not mine.

So why are you here at all arguing like you care?

originally posted by: Eshel
a reply to: timequake

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Do you respond to things without reading them?

I thought perhaps you gathered that from someone else's quote. My apologies. Your statement that followed seemed to be from someone who misapplied or failed to understand the quote in the definition, thus I thought it from someone else.

originally posted by: TinySickTears
Does the right to bear arms say any and all types?
Let's just say a certain type of gun was taken away.
Plenty of others so people could still bear arms.

It's an honest question.

Does it mean any and all types?

No but it does say for the Militia.
What good is a militia that can't fight an invading army?
Single shot rifles and revolvers are not capable to doing that job.

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: projectvxn

I'm not sure it matters anymore.

It does matter.

They are trying to turn you into a criminal with the stroke of their magic pen.

Cause the pen is mightier than the gun.

Pen gun, mightier than the sword. Sword gun, mightier than the pen gun.

a reply to: neo96

And you guys most likely voted Trump solely in spite of Clinton and the media and now feel the need to justify your vote by any means necessary. No one likes to admit they were wrong about something.

a reply to: DBCowboy

I know how to beat them.

We can just say our guns had an operation and they're supposed to be called something else.

a reply to: DBCowboy

Republicans have a history of wanting to take people's freedoms away too, but I don't see you mentioning those.

a reply to: neo96

My gun identifies as a TV.

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

No one likes to admit they were wrong about something.

That must us like the last president.

Never wrong about anything.

originally posted by: notsure1
a reply to: neo96

My gun identifies as a TV.

That's the idea!

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: DBCowboy

Republicans have a history of wanting to take people's freedoms away too, but I don't see you mentioning those.

I said leftists.

Not political parties, but political ideologies.

Republicans are also leftists.

Not all leftists are democrats.

Liberals aren't leftists.

I now dub thee, Annoyster, King of the Llamas.