President Donald Trump is About to Change the Middle East Forever

Donald Trump is about to change the Middle East forever

"President Trump has co-ordinated with the Crown Princes as key regional allies. To what end? Perhaps the Syria engagement is coming to a close, but more likely the troublesome Yemen conflict is in overtime at last. Working with the Gulf Cooperation Council instead of leading from behind indicates that -unlike Barack Obama's disastrous tenure- the Trump administration does not treat the Middle Eastern governments like children."

If this is right the GCC are looking to roll up Yemen, Syria and Iran in the next few years, with USAF and USMC support and co-ordination. the knock on effect for Europe could be huge too

Welcome to ATS.... What comes to mind with Syria, is it having Damascus destroyed, leveled.

The Middle East should be left alone to resolve their own collective regional conflicts and chart their own collective destiny. Western interventions and involvement based on strategic and economic interests has been an unmitigated disaster.

That said, Iran is emerging as the most destabilizing factor in the region and will have to be confronted accordingly, and soon.

imo

originally posted by: ausername
The Middle East should be left alone to resolve their own collective regional conflicts and chart their own collective destiny. Western interventions and involvement based on strategic and economic interests has been an unmitigated disaster.

That said, Iran is emerging as the most destabilizing factor in the region and will have to be confronted accordingly, and soon.

imo

That's quite a contradiction you got there.

originally posted by: ausername
The Middle East should be left alone to resolve their own collective regional conflicts and chart their own collective destiny. Western interventions and involvement based on strategic and economic interests has been an unmitigated disaster.

That said, Iran is emerging as the most destabilizing factor in the region and will have to be confronted accordingly, and soon.

imo

right, got it......let's have Russia and China have all the influence they want to, in those "regional conflicts", while America sits back and isolates themselves from the rest of the world...yeah, great plan....apparently you do not know how the real world works.

a reply to: AgarthaSeed

I don't see how, the confrontation with Iran, if any should not involve any outside countries, including the US.

It's an inevitable regional conflict/war, we should have nothing to do with, no side to be on.

Next to Iran, I think the USA has also been a lead destabilizing factor in the region as well.

For clarity on my opinion.

a reply to: BlueLocust

President Trump has co-ordinated with the Crown Princes as key regional allies. To what end?

Kill everyone, take everything, burn whats left.

a reply to: ausername

I agree. I thought you were suggesting that the U.S. take action on Iran. But I gotchya.

originally posted by: jimmyx

originally posted by: ausername
The Middle East should be left alone to resolve their own collective regional conflicts and chart their own collective destiny. Western interventions and involvement based on strategic and economic interests has been an unmitigated disaster.

That said, Iran is emerging as the most destabilizing factor in the region and will have to be confronted accordingly, and soon.

imo

right, got it......let's have Russia and China have all the influence they want to, in those "regional conflicts", while America sits back and isolates themselves from the rest of the world...yeah, great plan....apparently you do not know how the real world works.

It's not up to the USA, Russia, China or any other powers who wins influence over the region, or particular countries/interests in the region.

These are sovereign countries, they should be left alone, respected as such, they aren't children. We've done enough damage in the region already. We are not there to resolve conflicts we are there to protect strategic and economic interests, and as such we are a huge part of the problem.

Imo

originally posted by: ausername
.

That said, Iran is emerging as the most destabilizing factor in the region and will have to be confronted accordingly, and soon.

imo

USA and its zionist rulers are the most destabilizing factor in the region and the world.

a reply to: BlueLocust
From your source;

Naturally leftist clowns on Twitter see the flash of the lure and take the hook, line, and sinker.

Kind of hard to take the article serious after that. What exactly is President Trump going to do to "change the Middle East forever"?

I don't know what was wrong with Obama when dealing with the middle east. I'd swear he had something against Muslims, he blew off Iraq when they asked for help. That is not the way our country should be acting. Then when his generals questioned his policy, he replaced them. I hope that Trump does a better job at restoring a half way relationship with that region. Bush and Clinton were not that good with dealing with the Middle East either, but way better than Obama.

We just need to learn to get along. We do not have to agree on everything, just respect each others rights to have our own different types of societies and try not to cause too big of conflicts.

originally posted by: ausername

originally posted by: jimmyx

originally posted by: ausername
The Middle East should be left alone to resolve their own collective regional conflicts and chart their own collective destiny. Western interventions and involvement based on strategic and economic interests has been an unmitigated disaster.

That said, Iran is emerging as the most destabilizing factor in the region and will have to be confronted accordingly, and soon.

imo

right, got it......let's have Russia and China have all the influence they want to, in those "regional conflicts", while America sits back and isolates themselves from the rest of the world...yeah, great plan....apparently you do not know how the real world works.

It's not up to the USA, Russia, China or any other powers who wins influence over the region, or particular countries/interests in the region.

These are sovereign countries, they should be left alone, respected as such, they aren't children. We've done enough damage in the region already. We are not there to resolve conflicts we are there to protect strategic and economic interests, and as such we are a huge part of the problem.

Imo

you might want to discuss that with the Syrian population and see how they feel....oh right, hundreds of thousands dead due to Russia helping Assad kill his own people.....it might be a VERY SMALL discussion group

originally posted by: ausername

That said, Iran is emerging as the most destabilizing factor in the region and will have to be confronted accordingly, and soon.

imo

Change Iran for Israel and your statement would be more accurate.

a reply to: BlueLocust

President Donald Trump is About to Change the Middle East Forever

FAKE NEWS.

It's the opposite:



The land of mordor rules the world.

originally posted by: ErrorErrorError

originally posted by: ausername
.

That said, Iran is emerging as the most destabilizing factor in the region and will have to be confronted accordingly, and soon.

imo

USA and its zionist rulers are the most destabilizing factor in the region and the world.

Israeli rulers don't kill their own people, they kill others that are trying to kill Israelis....the Syrian government and Iran have been the most destabilizing governments in the region.....maybe you can go and visit the graves of the millions of Muslims that those 2 governments alone, have slaughtered...you might have to do a little "digging" since there are massive dumps of bodies still being uncovered.

I really liked this part:

All this comes hot on the heels of leaked audio which confirmed news reports from two weeks ago that Russian contractors had tested the United States military- and paid the price.
"Our guys were going to commandeer an oil refinery, and the Yankees were holding it ... We got our f--- asses beat rough.... There was no foot soldiers [on the American side]; they simply f--- our convoy with artillery."

This corroborates the initial battle reports released on the 16th of February. Apparently, the squadrons referred to are the T-55 and T-72 tanks that are utilized by both Syrian forces and the Russian mercenaries.

"U.S. counter-attack in Syria included Air Force AC-130 gunships, F-15s, F-22s, Army Apache helicopter gunships and Marine Corps artillery killing 100 Russian and Assad-backed fighters in 3-hour battle beginning around midnight last night."
"First of all, the bombers attacked, and then they cleaned up using Apaches," a Cossack paramilitary leader told Reuters.

The Russians know now -for the first time in Putin's long political career- that the US is no longer a walkover. Without a single infantryman, the United States Marine Corps and the USAF inflicted around 300 Russian dead for no losses. For some reason, this hasn't hit the front pages of every newspaper in America. Perhaps due to the ongoing gun control chatter and the conveniently timed announcement of President Trump's re-election campaign, there aren't column inches to spare for this minor engagement.

Chewing bubble gum and kicking ass!

a reply to: worldstarcountry

That made me feel great pride in all things U.S. too!

Soldiers.. tech.. wow.

a reply to: worldstarcountry


What is obvious is that Trump is still pursuing the objective of doing all the countries not having a Rothschild bank. Same # different asshole.