Pence: Legal [child murder] will end with this generation

a reply to: randyvs

That is how I see it, you see it different and that fine
You metion the founding fathers*(a few posts back)..I think they wanted a clear seperation between church and state?

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: eNumbra

They should call it what it is.

A man who sees the God given right to life.
Exactly as the founding fathers did when
they so carefully penned word to paper.
Or were they also so incompetent in the
absence of atheist ideas that replace the
truth with nothing?

Incompetent is shorter, and rolls off the tongue easier.

originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: randyvs

That is how I see it, you see it different and that fine
You metion the founding fathers*(a few posts back)..I think they wanted a clear seperation between church and state?

The way I see it can't be ignored. The amount
of unreasonale, unprovoked; seething hatred
is beyond obvious any time somone refers
to God in any thread on this site. As well as
any other. You can't possibly even deny it.
The hate is born mostly in universaties and
resides in closed minded childissh intellectuals
mostly.

The separation is irrelevant

a reply to: eNumbra

Doesn't suprize me that you would rather regard your
Rights as the manifestation of incompetence. Oh but that
isn't hate?

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: eNumbra

Doesn't suprize that you would rather regard your
as the manifestation of incompetence. Oh but that
isn't hate?

I suggest we return to the topic.

Lol, not sure what you’re even trying to say, but you clearly know nothing about me.

Live for the life you have, not fairy tales. Bodily autonomy is of extreme importance, or do you want someone else to determine that someone else needs one of your kidneys more than you do?

a reply to: eNumbra

Ya. I forgot to proof read. Apolgies.

I' m pretty sure this isn't about you.
It's about all of us.
And fairytales are intended to be fairytales
by the author. It's obvious you don't know
much about literature. If you identify
scripture as fairytales. No end to the ignorance.

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: eNumbra

Ya. I forgot to proof read. Apolgies.

I don’t regard my rights as incompetence, I regard the belief that Jesus is going to return to earth in the next few decades as incompetence.

You’re the one who attempted to reframe the discussion away from religious zealotry.

And if you wish to stay strictly on topic, what do you think of bodily autonomy and the right to determine what goes on in your own body.

a reply to: eNumbra

I regard the truth of it. Should irresponsible
sex be remedied with the homocide of the
innocent? As long as the little person isn't
wanted? Send in the butcher right?

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: eNumbra

I regard the truth of it. Should irresponsible
sex be remedied with the homocide of the
innocent? As long as the little person isn't
wanted? Send in the butcher right?

Please define 'irresponsible sex'. I am fascinated by what's going to emerge.

originally posted by: randyvs

originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: randyvs

That is how I see it, you see it different and that fine
You metion the founding fathers*(a few posts back)..I think they wanted a clear seperation between church and state?

The way I see it can't be ignored. The amount
of unreasonale, unprovoked; seething hatred
is beyond obvious any time somone refers
to God in any thread on this site. As well as
any other. You can't possibly even deny it.
The hate is born mostly in universaties and
resides in closed minded childissh intellectuals
mostly.

The separation is irrelevant

I think that this is somehow a post aimed at atheists. Speaking for myself, as an atheist, my theism died a messy death when I actually studied the Bible. I don't hate by the way. I merely point out contradictions and other awkward facts. If that is hatred then you need to buy a new dictionary.

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

I think that this is somehow a post aimed at atheists. Speaking for myself, as an atheist, my theism died a messy death when I actually studied the Bible. I don't hate by the way. I merely point out contradictions and other awkward facts. If that is hatred then you need to buy a new dictionary.

Just another angle on the need to control?

Its almost palpable on some of the postings!!

a reply to: randyvs

but, your god neglected to give women the freedom to decide weather there would be sex or not,
or to decide anything else about how she would live her life, or at least that is what the author of those scriptures would wish us to believe.
so, if there is irresponsible sex going on, I would assume that most of the "sin" would be on the hands of the man, since, for the women to refuse the man anything, she has to step outside of god's will to begin with???

maybe it's just better to keep religious views out of this discussion,
since you can't in good faith tell the wife to not have sex after you tell her that god wants her to obey her husband IN ALL THINGS!!!
matter of fact, why don't all you guys just go off and talk to the men about being responsible in their sexual lives and leave us women to deal with the result of your lack of responsibility as we see fit.

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: eNumbra

I regard the truth of it. Should irresponsible
sex be remedied with the homocide of the
innocent? As long as the little person isn't
wanted? Send in the butcher right?

Stop dodging the question.
What do you think of bodily autonomy, and how it relates to abortion rights? Do you think you have an inalienable right to one of your kidneys? Or a pint or two of your blood?

originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: randyvs

but, your god neglected to give women the freedom to decide weather there would be sex or not,
or to decide anything else about how she would live her life, or at least that is what the author of those scriptures would wish us to believe.
so, if there is irresponsible sex going on, I would assume that most of the "sin" would be on the hands of the man, since, for the women to refuse the man anything, she has to step outside of god's will to begin with???

maybe it's just better to keep religious views out of this discussion,
since you can't in good faith tell the wife to not have sex after you tell her that god wants her to obey her husband IN ALL THINGS!!!
matter of fact, why don't all you guys just go off and talk to the men about being responsible in their sexual lives and leave us women to deal with the result of your lack of responsibility as we see fit.

I think it's odd that you define irresponsible sex as
with in a marriage.

a reply to: eNumbra

I didn't dodge shlt. And a kidney isn' t even a living
being. So where can you be going with that? Not
even comparable to the mentally impaired. Got
any questions worth answering. Lol

a reply to: dawnstar

You can think what you want about God.
But if you decide to use your brain when
doing so. You would at least ask yourself
how he could put the comos together with
out flaw. And have you find one for him in the
gigantic span of your godless life?

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: eNumbra

I didn't dodge shlt. And a kidney isn' t even a living
being. So where can you be going with that?

If you’d stop dodging and start reading you’d know. So I’ll ask you a THIRD TIME.

Bodily autonomy as it relates to abortion. Do you have the right to decide what happens to your body, or does someone else have the right to do with it how they please?

a reply to: eNumbra

Do you have the right to decide what happens to your body

A developing fetus IS NOT YOUR BODY!

a reply to: thepixelpusher

I can't believe people are so lost. They have to
ask a question like that. God puts the unborn
in what should be the safest place on earth.
Where the intelligent mother and father can
Protect it. And what does man do? He finds
a way the whole human race can be guilty
of sacrificing thier unborn children. I myself
had girl friends in the past who aborted.
So I'm not at all innocent or being a self
righteous ass or hypocrite. I'm as guilty as
anyone. At least I know it was WRONG.

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: eNumbra

A developing fetus IS NOT YOUR BODY!

A fetus cannot develop without ANOTHER's body.

It is someone else's body that keeps a fetus ALIVE.

Anothers body nourishes and breathes for it.

A fetus cannot exist before 20 weeks unless in someone else's body.

Before 20 weeks gestation a fetus is not a person in its own right it

cannot exist on its own.



Go back and look at your enhanced illustrations the fetus is inaccurate and is

not even facing the correct way.