Google Patents | Nervous System Manipulation by ElectroMagnetic Fields from Monitors

First post for me here on ATS, Mods if this is not in the correct forum feel free to move.

From source patent:
Physiological effects have been observed in a human subject in response to stimulation of the skin with weak electromagnetic fields that are pulsed with certain frequencies near ½ Hz or 2.4 Hz, such as to excite a sensory resonance. Many computer monitors and TV tubes, when displaying pulsed images, emit pulsed electromagnetic fields of sufficient amplitudes to cause such excitation. It is therefore possible to manipulate the nervous system of a subject by pulsing images displayed on a nearby computer monitor or TV set. For the latter, the image pulsing may be imbedded in the program material, or it may be overlaid by modulating a video stream, either as an RF signal or as a video signal. The image displayed on a computer monitor may be pulsed effectively by a simple computer program. For certain monitors, pulsed electromagnetic fields capable of exciting sensory resonances in nearby subjects may be generated even as the displayed images are pulsed with subliminal intensity.

patents.google.com...

I found this from a friend online. I started digging into it but as I am not as smart as some here on ATS I would like to get some of the "Brains" here to tell me what all this means. It talks about "sensory resonance" coming from monitors and/or TV's. Could this be used as a programming tool for MK Ultra? Could this kind of technology be used on people like the "accused" Florida shooter? With everything we all know about Eric Schmidt and his visits to N.K. could the CIA be wrapped up in this tech as well?

Thanks in advance for taking the time to read/answer. I feel accomplished to have finally made a contribution to this website. I have to have my ATS at least once a day. DENY IGNORANCE!!

Blueye69r

a reply to: Blueye69r

Pulse variability may be introduced for alleviating the need for precise tuning to a resonance frequency. This may be important when sensory resonance frequencies are not precisely known, because of the variation among individuals, or in order to cope with the frequency drift that results from chemical detuning that is discussed in the '874 patent. A field with suitably chosen pulse variability can then be more effective than a fixed frequency field that is out of tune. One may also control tremors and seizures, by interfering with the pathological oscillatory activity of neural circuits that occurs in these disorders.

Chemical detuning?

Looking for the '874 patent referenced.

They were running this on Windows 95/98 using VB6 and it had remote capabilities?

Thank you for the post... interesting and I want to dig more!!!

From Your Link:

It has been found that, indeed, physiological effects can be induced in this manner by very weak electric fields, if they are pulsed with a frequency near ½ Hz. The observed effects include ptosis of the eyelids, relaxation, drowziness, the feeling of pressure at a centered spot on the lower edge of the brow, seeing moving patterns of dark purple and greenish yellow with the eyes closed, a tonic smile, a tense feeling in the stomach, sudden loose stool, and sexual excitement, depending on the precise frequency used, and the skin area to which the field is applied. The sharp frequency dependence suggests involvement of a resonance mechanism.

2. A computer program for manipulating the nervous system of a subject located near a monitor, the monitor emitting an electromagnetic field when displaying an image by virtue of the physical display process, the subject having cutaneous nerves that fire spontaneously and have spiking patterns, the computer program comprising:

edit on 28-2-2018 by The GUT because: (no reason given)

...

It makes you wonder just how far they will really be willing to go in an attempt to enslave us all.

The good news is...
turning off that power switch and go outside instead of watching your favorite show has never been that much easy.

I wouldn't be surprised if this technology has been in use for years now without someone claiming a patent on it until now. Scary to think that certain web pages or stories could cause "excitement" to those viewing it. Might be a way to get people hooked on certain topics and subjects from the subconscious excitement they feel from this frequency.

They have us all switched over to LED technology. The mind control plan is all in progress. I know it is possible, I know it is probably being done. I just don't know what group is utilizing this and setting it up. I do not know what they are trying to brainwash us with either, maybe asking the Chinese who make the monitors who is stipulating what specific software is required in TVs sent to the USA.

a reply to: Blueye69r

" sensory resonance" or maybe linked to ...other names shall we say . Dr. Rupert Sheldrake (University of Cambridge)
GOOGLE TALKS 2008
'The Extended Mind: Recent Experimental Evidence.

check out the inventor of this patent. a mister hendricus G Loos
He has been a top secret government scientist since the 60s. And his last 7 or so patents have all been involved with different vectors for central nervous system manipulation

Google loves all the little sheeple, all the sheeple of the world.

Headphone and earpods would be the best mechanism. Those tiny magnets for the speakers are those super-strong neodymium magnets. You can always check the strength of magnetic fields using a smartphone.

You guys are great at what you do, this is why I come to ATS. The members here are some of the most intelligent people I have had the pleasure of following. Thanks for the input gentlemen/ladies.

Sounds like a how to for making mass shooters.

Binaural beats are real then?

Isnt this in the Theta range?

originally posted by: St0rD
It makes you wonder just how far they will really be willing to go in an attempt to enslave us all.

The good news is...
turning off that power switch and go outside instead of watching your favorite show has never been that much easy.

The bad news being that many people have to be on their computer all day to work. But not sure how this is delivered - if a computer, I imagine coding has to be there, so unless they program say, the Office suite to do this (which I guess they could), only certain programs or websites or whatever would create this signal.

A bit alarming regardless.

a reply to: Blueye69r

Well, I may not be an expert, but I have been an audio engineer for over 20 years. I have been lectured by PHDs in acoustics, etc. From my understanding, the key to this is the low amplitude. Any frequency at an extreme amplitude will cause some level of stress, but this is the first that I have heard about effects being generated at low amplitude. This is dangerous stuff. When combined with visual stimulation, it could induce all sorts of effects. Of course, the resonant frequency will affect every person differently due to their mass, but I am reminded of those diplomats in Cuba that claimed to have been attacked by an auditory weapon. All things said, this needs to be made illegal, like, yesterday.

a reply to: Blueye69r

The observed effects include ptosis of the eyelids, relaxation, drowziness

That would be the ideal set-up to induce a hypnotic state. There are all sorts of theories already that TV signals went digital so that they could pulse at a frequency that made viewers receptive [gullible].

sudden loose stool, and sexual excitement, depending on the precise frequency used, and the skin area to which the field is applied.

Imagine if you applied this to classical conditioning. Have an MK subject viewing graphically violent videos with imposed sexual excitement; they naturally associate the two and with a little CIA prompting, suddenly go on a killing spree...

The human brain consumes 100 watts of power, about the same as a ight bulb. In comparison mobile cell phone masts are hundreds of watts of power, while mobile devices are 0.6 watts and 3 watts. CB radios are 4 watts. That energy is consumed through chemical interactions with atomic and moelcular bonds breaking and connecting. That involves exchange of electrons, which will then result in the emission of photons in the electromagnetic spectrum. Many frequencies won't escape the human body because they will be absorbed by other tissue. But radio waves would escape.

With human vision, there are different regions that are used to detect motion, so when someone moves an arm or leg, there will be a burst of activity in another persons brain as neurons start firing. These involve exchange of ions like sodium, chloride, calcium, so that would generate a minute EMF pulse. Even more power is used driving muscles.
So it would seem quite possible that each brain could be emitting a small RF signal.

The next part is trying to detect that signal. There's a field of science called signal processing, which involves analyzing a constant stream of data looking for useful information. This could be a unique combination of frequencies and harmonics (the sound of a car engine) or the RF frequency of electromagnetic coils in a CRT monitor.

So all one brain would need to do, is be able to sense the activity of other surrounding brains, and if there was a signal, do a correlation match between motion of their body and activity around them. If there is, then turn around and look in that direction.

With fish, they have sensors along the length of their body, known as the lateral line, which detects changes in water pressure in the same way that we can detect air blowing against our skin. Birds do the same with feathers. The inputs from these nerve endings are linked to the muscle nerves, so they can respond rapidly to any changes such as the motion of a predator and other fish or birds.

originally posted by: Butterfinger
Binaural beats are real then?

Isnt this in the Theta range?

1 - Binaural beats have always been 'real' and are not related to this (though I suppose if you stuck this tech in headphones you could arrange that too).

They are simply a matter of sending slightly different frequencies to each ear, which feeds this to the separate brain lobes, and then the middle of the brain basically resonates with the "difference" in the frequencies. For example if you play 12hz in one ear and 8hz in the other, the center brain will generate 4hz as a result of the frequencies on each side.

2 - The effect above is whatever you make it. You can arrange for the 'difference' in frequency tones you send to be anything you want, for any brainwave state you want.

Best,
RC

Extremely low frequency (ELF) stuff is the most powerful and dangerous it seems. Whitley Streiber wrote a book called "Black Magic" years before his first alien book, and he said the spooks just overwhelmingly rushed him, tried to prevent him even writing fiction about it. He isn't the first to have had issues due to interest in the subject.

If there's a patent for this today I'm pretty sure someone's been working on it in the background for a long time. Remember how many years, like DECADES, anybody who said they heard an *actual* audible voice in their head, even if that person was totally a sane professional with no other 'symptoms', was considered a lunatic? Then actual advertisement was released that could "project" frequencies of voices right into the heads of passers-by? (Odd we didn't hear more about that for long.) Wonder how all those people told they were insane, felt about probably being the early experimental subjects for that tech.

RC